Skinner Natalie, Roche Ann M
1National Centre for Education and Training on Addiction, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Sep;40(6):989-997. doi: 10.1111/dar.13250. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
Alcohol and other drug (AOD) work can be highly meaningful and satisfying, but also intense and highly demanding. This combination often creates significant strain for workers. Mirroring this complexity, this study considered the predictors and outcomes of the concurrent experience of burnout and engagement in AOD workers. The Job Demands-Resources model informed the study.
This study utilised data from a recent Australian AOD workforce survey. The sample comprised 886 workers in direct client service roles. K-means cluster analysis on burnout and engagement measures identified four discrete groups: burnt out (15.6%) (high burnout/low engagement), engaged (36.7%) (low burnout/high engagement), overextended (26.5%) (high burnout/high engagement) and indifferent (21.2%) (low burnout/low engagement).
Multinomial logistic regression analysis indicated that workers were more likely to be burnt out or overextended, rather than engaged, if they reported high work intensity, low organisational openness to change and low support. Multivariate analysis of variance showed burnt-out workers had the least favourable and engaged respondents the most favourable outcomes on job satisfaction, turnover intention, health and life quality. Overextended workers were comparable to indifferent workers on these outcomes.
This study offers a unique and nuanced view of AOD worker wellbeing. For the one-quarter of workers reporting simultaneous burnout and engagement, their enthusiasm and commitment did not protect them from poor personal and organisational outcomes typically linked with burnout. The need for systemic and structural interventions is clearly indicated, including open and supportive organisational cultures, leadership development and adequate staffing.
酒精和其他药物(AOD)相关工作可能极具意义且令人满足,但同时也强度大、要求高。这种情况常常给工作人员带来巨大压力。反映出这种复杂性,本研究探讨了AOD工作人员倦怠与投入并存体验的预测因素和结果。工作需求 - 资源模型为该研究提供了指导。
本研究使用了近期澳大利亚AOD劳动力调查的数据。样本包括886名直接从事客户服务工作的人员。对倦怠和投入测量进行的K均值聚类分析确定了四个不同的群体:倦怠型(15.6%)(高倦怠/低投入)、投入型(36.7%)(低倦怠/高投入)、过度劳累型(26.5%)(高倦怠/高投入)和冷漠型(21.2%)(低倦怠/低投入)。
多项逻辑回归分析表明,如果工作人员报告工作强度高、组织对变革的开放性低且支持少,那么他们更有可能倦怠或过度劳累,而非投入工作。方差多变量分析显示,倦怠的工作人员在工作满意度、离职意向、健康和生活质量方面的结果最不理想,而投入的受访者结果最理想。过度劳累的工作人员在这些结果方面与冷漠的工作人员相当。
本研究对AOD工作人员的幸福感提供了独特而细致入微的观点。对于四分之一报告同时存在倦怠和投入情况的工作人员来说,他们的热情和奉献精神并不能使他们免受通常与倦怠相关的不良个人和组织结果的影响。显然需要进行系统性和结构性干预,包括开放且支持性的组织文化、领导力发展和充足的人员配备。