Rodríguez-San Esteban Pablo, Gonzalez-Lopez Jose A, Chica Ana B
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada (UGR), Granada, Spain.
Brain, Mind, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), Campus of Cartuja, University of Granada (UGR), Granada, 18011, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 6;15(1):7888. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92490-y.
Machine learning (ML) techniques have steadily gained popularity in Neuroscience research, particularly when applied to the analysis of neuroimaging data. One of the most discussed topics in this field, the neural correlates of conscious (and unconscious) information, has also benefited from these approaches. Nevertheless, further research is still necessary to better understand the minimal neural mechanisms that are necessary and sufficient for experiencing any conscious percept, and which mechanisms are comparable and discernible between conscious and unconscious events. The aim of this study was two-fold. First, to explore whether it was possible to decode task-relevant features from electroencephalography (EEG) signals, particularly those related to perceptual awareness. Secondly, to test whether this decoding could be improved by using time-frequency representations instead of voltage. We employed a perceptual task in which participants were presented with near-threshold Gabor stimuli. They were asked to discriminate the orientation of the grating, and report whether they had perceived it or not. Participants' EEG signal was recorded while performing the task and was then analysed by using ML algorithms to decode distinctive task-related parameters. Results demonstrated the feasibility of decoding the presence/absence of the stimuli from EEG data, as well as participants' subjective perception, although the model failed to extract relevant information related to the orientation of the Gabor. Unconscious processing of unseen stimulation was observed both behaviourally and at the neural level. Moreover, contrary to conscious processing, unconscious representations were less stable across time, and only observed at early perceptual stages (~ 100 ms) and during response preparation. Furthermore, we conducted a comparative analysis of the performance of the classifier when employing either raw voltage signals or time-frequency representations, finding a substantial improvement when the latter was used to train the model, particularly in the theta and alpha bands. These findings underscore the significant potential of ML algorithms in decoding perceptual awareness from EEG data in consciousness research tasks.
机器学习(ML)技术在神经科学研究中越来越受欢迎,尤其是在应用于神经影像数据分析时。该领域讨论最多的话题之一,即有意识(和无意识)信息的神经关联,也从这些方法中受益。然而,仍有必要进一步研究,以更好地理解产生任何有意识感知所必需且充分的最小神经机制,以及哪些机制在有意识和无意识事件之间是可比较和可辨别的。本研究的目的有两个。首先,探讨是否有可能从脑电图(EEG)信号中解码与任务相关的特征,特别是那些与感知意识相关的特征。其次,测试使用时频表示而非电压是否可以改善这种解码。我们采用了一种感知任务,向参与者呈现接近阈值的Gabor刺激。要求他们辨别光栅的方向,并报告是否感知到了它。在参与者执行任务时记录其EEG信号,然后使用ML算法进行分析,以解码独特的与任务相关的参数。结果表明,从EEG数据中解码刺激的存在/不存在以及参与者的主观感知是可行的,尽管该模型未能提取与Gabor方向相关的相关信息。在行为和神经层面都观察到了对未看见刺激的无意识处理。此外,与有意识处理相反,无意识表征在时间上不太稳定,仅在早期感知阶段(约100毫秒)和反应准备期间观察到。此外,我们对使用原始电压信号或时频表示时分类器的性能进行了比较分析,发现使用后者训练模型时性能有显著提高,特别是在theta和alpha波段。这些发现强调了ML算法在意识研究任务中从EEG数据解码感知意识方面的巨大潜力。