Suppr超能文献

非侵入性技术在创伤性脑损伤分诊及与颅内压相关性方面的疗效:一项前瞻性研究。

Efficacy of Noninvasive Technologies in Triaging Traumatic Brain Injury and Correlating With Intracranial Pressure: A Prospective Study.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Ohio.

Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Ohio.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2021 Jun;262:27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.042. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is interest in methods of measuring noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP), including pupillometry, ultrasonographic transcranial Doppler (TCD), and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), for diagnosing traumatic brain injury (TBI) in limited resource environments. Whether these technologies have diagnostic agreement is unknown. We hypothesized that ONSD, pupillometry, and TCD could both distinguish severe TBI and correlate with ICP.

METHODS

A prospective study of 135 patients was conducted at a level 1 trauma center. Four test groups were established: nontrauma patients with ICP monitoring, trauma patients without TBI, trauma patients with mild TBI, and trauma patients with severe TBI with ICP monitoring. All patients underwent daily measurements of ONSD, pupillometry, and TCD with both CX50 Sonosite and the Spencer ST3 Yi Pencil probe.

RESULTS

ONSD differed significantly in patients with severe TBI compared with patients with mild and no TBI, but did not correlate with ICP. Pupillometric constriction velocity, dilation velocity, and percent change in pupil diameter were significantly different in patients with severe TBI, but also did not correlate with ICP. TCD did not differ among TBI severities, but middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity, middle cerebral artery flow velocity, and carotid flow velocity correlated with ICP.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a novel study of four noninvasive tests to screen for severity of TBI and measure ICP. Our analysis indicates that no single device can do both. However, ONSD and pupillometry may be used as a supplementary screening tool for severe TBI, whereas TCD could be used to estimate and follow ICP in patients with severe TBI.

摘要

背景

人们对测量非侵入性颅内压(ICP)的方法感兴趣,包括瞳孔计、超声经颅多普勒(TCD)和视神经鞘直径(ONSD),以便在资源有限的环境中诊断创伤性脑损伤(TBI)。这些技术是否具有诊断一致性尚不清楚。我们假设 ONSD、瞳孔计和 TCD 既可以区分严重 TBI,又可以与 ICP 相关。

方法

在一级创伤中心进行了一项 135 例患者的前瞻性研究。建立了四个测试组:有 ICP 监测的非创伤患者、无 TBI 的创伤患者、轻度 TBI 的创伤患者和有 ICP 监测的严重 TBI 的创伤患者。所有患者均接受了每日 ONSD、瞳孔计和 TCD 的测量,使用了 CX50 Sonosite 和 Spencer ST3 Yi Pencil 探头。

结果

与轻度 TBI 和无 TBI 患者相比,严重 TBI 患者的 ONSD 差异显著,但与 ICP 不相关。瞳孔计收缩速度、扩张速度和瞳孔直径变化百分比在严重 TBI 患者中差异显著,但也与 ICP 不相关。TCD 在 TBI 严重程度之间没有差异,但大脑中动脉收缩期峰值速度、大脑中动脉血流速度和颈动脉血流速度与 ICP 相关。

结论

这是一项关于四种非侵入性测试用于筛查 TBI 严重程度和测量 ICP 的新研究。我们的分析表明,没有单一的设备可以同时做到这两点。然而,ONSD 和瞳孔计可以用作严重 TBI 的辅助筛查工具,而 TCD 可用于估计和监测严重 TBI 患者的 ICP。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验