Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
ESMO Open. 2021 Apr;6(2):100040. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2020.100040. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
The therapeutic landscape of cancer is changing rapidly due to the growing number of approved drugs capable of targeting specific genetic alterations. This aspect, together with the development of noninvasive methods for the assessment of somatic mutations in the peripheral blood of patients, generated a growing interest toward a new tumor-agnostic classification system based on 'predictive' biomarkers. The current review article discusses this emerging alternative approach to the classification of cancer and its implications for the selection of treatments. It is suggested that different types of cancers sharing the same molecular profiles could benefit from the same targeted drugs. Although recent clinical trials have demonstrated that this approach cannot be generalized, there are also specific examples that demonstrate the clinical utility of this alternative vision. In this rapidly evolving scenario, a multidisciplinary approach managed by institutional Molecular Tumor Boards is fundamental to interpret the biological and clinical relevance of genetic alterations and the complexity of their relationship with treatment response.
由于越来越多的能够针对特定基因改变的批准药物,癌症的治疗领域正在迅速变化。这一方面,加上用于评估患者外周血体细胞突变的非侵入性方法的发展,使得人们对基于“预测”生物标志物的新的肿瘤不可知分类系统产生了越来越大的兴趣。本文综述了这种新兴的癌症分类替代方法及其对治疗选择的影响。有人认为,具有相同分子谱的不同类型的癌症可能会从相同的靶向药物中受益。尽管最近的临床试验表明这种方法不能被普遍应用,但也有具体的例子证明了这种替代方法的临床实用性。在这种快速发展的情况下,由机构分子肿瘤委员会管理的多学科方法对于解释遗传改变的生物学和临床意义以及它们与治疗反应的关系的复杂性至关重要。