Anticoagulation Program Manager, Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Salem Veterans Affair Medical Center, Department of Pharmacy, Salem, Virginia.
Salem Veterans Affair Medical Center, Quality Management-Program Analyst.
Thromb Res. 2021 Apr;200:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.01.019. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
Oral anticoagulants (OAC) have shown to affect bone mineral density and cause osteoporosis. Limited studies have investigated the relationship between its use and risk of osteoporosis. We aim to compare the risk of osteoporosis in patients on warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted in veterans age > 18 years of age in whom warfarin or DOACs were newly initiated between January 1st, 2012 to April 1st, 2020 at Salem VA Medical Center. Patients on OAC for at least 90 days qualified for inclusion and excluded if they were pregnant or had history of mechanical valve and mitral stenosis, on edoxaban or had previous history of osteoporosis or use of antiosteoporosis medication. Primary outcome was comparing incidence of new-onset osteoporosis between warfarin and DOACs. Secondary outcomes included comparing incidence of all clinical fractures, hip fractures, major bleeding and intracranial bleed between the treatments. Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing the two treatment groups were calculated.
A total of 1526 patients on DOAC and 1121 in warfarin group were included in the study. After propensity-score (PS) matching, 943 patients were included in each arm. Baseline characteristics were similar after PS-matching. DOAC treatment was associated with lower incidence of new-onset osteoporosis as compared to warfarin in matched cohort (aHR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10-0.36; p < 0.0001). The risk of all clinical fracture and hip fracture was similar in patients receiving DOACs as versus warfarin (aHR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.82-1.69; p = 0.3671). DOAC use was associated with lower risk of major bleed (aHR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.03-0.15; p < 0.0001) and intracranial bleed (aHR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.03-0.64; p = 0.0111).
Overall, as compared to warfarin, prolonged use of DOACs is associated with lower risk of new-onset osteoporosis. We hope that our study findings will enlighten current clinical practices assuring safe use of OAC in veteran patients.
口服抗凝剂 (OAC) 已被证明会影响骨矿物质密度并导致骨质疏松症。有限的研究调查了其使用与骨质疏松症风险之间的关系。我们旨在比较华法林与直接口服抗凝剂 (DOAC) 患者的骨质疏松症风险。
这是一项在 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 4 月 1 日期间在 Salem VA 医疗中心新开始使用华法林或 DOAC 的年龄 > 18 岁退伍军人中进行的回顾性单中心队列研究。至少使用 OAC90 天的患者符合纳入标准,如果患者怀孕或有机械瓣膜和二尖瓣狭窄病史、服用依度沙班或有既往骨质疏松症病史或使用抗骨质疏松症药物,则将其排除在外。主要结局是比较华法林和 DOAC 之间新发骨质疏松症的发生率。次要结局包括比较两种治疗方法的所有临床骨折、髋部骨折、大出血和颅内出血的发生率。计算比较两组治疗的 Cox 比例风险比 (HR) 和 95%置信区间 (CI)。
共有 1526 名患者接受 DOAC 治疗,1121 名患者接受华法林治疗。在进行倾向评分 (PS) 匹配后,每组纳入 943 名患者。PS 匹配后,基线特征相似。与华法林相比,DOAC 治疗与新发骨质疏松症的发生率较低相关(调整后的 HR:0.19,95%CI:0.10-0.36;p<0.0001)。接受 DOACs 治疗的患者的所有临床骨折和髋部骨折风险与接受华法林治疗的患者相似(调整后的 HR:1.18,95%CI:0.82-1.69;p=0.3671)。DOAC 治疗与大出血(调整后的 HR:0.07,95%CI:0.03-0.15;p<0.0001)和颅内出血(调整后的 HR:0.14,95%CI:0.03-0.64;p=0.0111)的风险降低相关。
总体而言,与华法林相比,长期使用 DOAC 与新发骨质疏松症的风险降低相关。我们希望我们的研究结果将为当前的临床实践提供启示,确保退伍军人患者安全使用 OAC。