Ko Byuk Sung, Choi Sung-Hyuk, Shin Tae Gun, Kim Kyuseok, Jo You Hwan, Ryoo Seung Mok, Park Yoo Seok, Kwon Woon Yong, Choi Han Sung, Chung Sung Phil, Suh Gil Joon, Kang Hyunggoo, Lim Tae Ho, Son Donghee, Kim Won Young
Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul 08308, Korea.
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 2;10(3):527. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030527.
This study aimed to address the impact of 1-hr bundle achievement on outcomes in septic shock patients. Secondary analysis of multicenter prospectively collected data on septic shock patients who had undergone protocolized resuscitation bundle therapy at emergency departments was conducted. In-hospital mortality according to 1-h bundle achievement was compared using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Patients were also divided into 3 groups according to the time of bundle achievement and outcomes were compared to examine the difference in outcome for each group over time: group 1 (≤1 h reference), group 2 (1-3 h) and group 3 (3-6 h). In total, 1612 patients with septic shock were included. The 1-h bundle was achieved in 461 (28.6%) patients. The group that achieved the 1-h bundle did not show a significant difference in in-hospital mortality compared to the group that did not achieve the 1-h bundle on multivariable logistic regression analysis (<1 vs. >1 h) (odds ratio = 0.74, = 0.091). However, 3- and 6- h bundle achievements showed significantly lower odds ratios of in-hospital mortality compared to the group that did not achieve the bundle (<3 vs. >3 h, <6 vs. >6 h, odds ratio = 0.604 and 0.458, respectively). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality over time for group 2 and 3 compared to that of group 1. One-hour bundle achievement was not associated with improved outcomes in septic shock patients. These data suggest that further investigation into the clinical implications of 1-h bundle achievement in patients with septic shock is warranted.
本研究旨在探讨1小时集束化治疗达标对感染性休克患者预后的影响。对在急诊科接受标准化复苏集束化治疗的感染性休克患者的多中心前瞻性收集数据进行了二次分析。使用多变量逻辑回归分析比较了根据1小时集束化治疗达标情况的院内死亡率。患者还根据集束化治疗达标的时间分为3组,并比较了各组随时间的预后差异:第1组(≤1小时,参照组)、第2组(1 - 3小时)和第3组(3 - 6小时)。总共纳入了1612例感染性休克患者。461例(28.6%)患者实现了1小时集束化治疗。在多变量逻辑回归分析中(<1小时与>1小时),实现1小时集束化治疗的组与未实现1小时集束化治疗的组相比,院内死亡率无显著差异(比值比 = 0.74,P = 0.091)。然而,与未实现集束化治疗的组相比,3小时和6小时集束化治疗达标显示院内死亡率的比值比显著更低(<3小时与>3小时,<6小时与>6小时,比值比分别为0.604和0.458)。与第1组相比,第2组和第3组随时间的院内死亡率无显著差异。1小时集束化治疗达标与感染性休克患者预后改善无关。这些数据表明,有必要进一步研究1小时集束化治疗达标对感染性休克患者的临床意义。