• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

构建一个理论框架以支持失语症的话语评估与干预。

Creating a Theoretical Framework to Underpin Discourse Assessment and Intervention in Aphasia.

作者信息

Dipper Lucy, Marshall Jane, Boyle Mary, Hersh Deborah, Botting Nicola, Cruice Madeline

机构信息

Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK.

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2021 Feb 2;11(2):183. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11020183.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci11020183
PMID:33540723
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7913065/
Abstract

Discourse (a unit of language longer than a single sentence) is fundamental to everyday communication. People with aphasia (a language impairment occurring most frequently after stroke, or other brain damage) have communication difficulties which lead to less complete, less coherent, and less complex discourse. Although there are multiple reviews of discourse assessment and an emerging evidence base for discourse intervention, there is no unified theoretical framework to underpin this research. Instead, disparate theories are recruited to explain different aspects of discourse impairment, or symptoms are reported without a hypothesis about the cause. What is needed is a theoretical framework that would clarify the specific linguistic skills that create completeness, coherence, and complexity (i.e., richness) in discourse, and illuminate both the processes involved in discourse production and the reasons for breakdown. This paper reports a review and synthesis of the theoretical literature relevant to spoken discourse in aphasia discourse, and we propose a novel theoretical framework which unites these disparate sources. This framework is currently being tested as the foundation for Linguistic Underpinnings of Narrative in Aphasia (LUNA) treatment research. In this paper, we outline the novel framework and exemplify how it might be used to guide clinical practice and research. Future collaborative research is needed to develop this framework into a processing model for spoken discourse.

摘要

语篇(一个比单个句子更长的语言单位)是日常交流的基础。失语症患者(一种最常发生在中风或其他脑损伤后的语言障碍)存在交流困难,这导致他们的语篇不那么完整、连贯和复杂。尽管有多项关于语篇评估的综述以及语篇干预的新兴证据基础,但尚无统一的理论框架来支撑这项研究。相反,人们采用不同的理论来解释语篇损伤的不同方面,或者在没有关于病因假设的情况下报告症状。我们需要一个理论框架,它能够阐明在语篇中创造完整性、连贯性和复杂性(即丰富性)的具体语言技能,并揭示语篇生成过程以及出现障碍的原因。本文报告了对失语症语篇中与口语语篇相关的理论文献的综述和综合,我们提出了一个新颖的理论框架,将这些不同的来源统一起来。这个框架目前正在作为失语症叙事语言基础(LUNA)治疗研究的基础进行测试。在本文中,我们概述了这个新颖的框架,并举例说明它如何用于指导临床实践和研究。未来需要开展合作研究,将这个框架发展成一个口语语篇的处理模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ffb/7913065/4de1a21ecc52/brainsci-11-00183-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ffb/7913065/0e21f2603c21/brainsci-11-00183-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ffb/7913065/503b11d3eab6/brainsci-11-00183-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ffb/7913065/4de1a21ecc52/brainsci-11-00183-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ffb/7913065/0e21f2603c21/brainsci-11-00183-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ffb/7913065/503b11d3eab6/brainsci-11-00183-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ffb/7913065/4de1a21ecc52/brainsci-11-00183-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Creating a Theoretical Framework to Underpin Discourse Assessment and Intervention in Aphasia.构建一个理论框架以支持失语症的话语评估与干预。
Brain Sci. 2021 Feb 2;11(2):183. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11020183.
2
UK speech and language therapists' views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation.英国言语治疗师在失语症康复中对话语分析的看法和报告的实践。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 May;55(3):417-442. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12528. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
3
The cognitive and neural underpinnings of discourse coherence in post-stroke aphasia.中风后失语症中语篇连贯性的认知和神经基础。
Brain Commun. 2022 Jun 14;4(3):fcac147. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac147. eCollection 2022.
4
Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: A review of the literature.失语症话语的语言分析:文献综述
Clin Linguist Phon. 2016;30(7):489-518. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2016.1145740. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
5
Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia.失语症中话语信息测量质量的综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Nov;52(6):689-732. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12318. Epub 2017 May 31.
6
Psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia: acceptability, reliability, and validity.失语症话语测量的心理测量特性:可接受性、信度和效度。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Nov;53(6):1078-1093. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12420. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
7
Attentive Reading With Constrained Summarization Adapted to Address Written Discourse in People With Mild Aphasia.注意阅读与受限总结相结合,以适应轻度失语症患者的书面语。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Mar 1;27(1S):392-405. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0200.
8
Measuring discourse coherence in anomic aphasia using Rhetorical Structure Theory.运用修辞结构理论测量命名性失语症中的语篇连贯性。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Aug;20(4):406-421. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1293158. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
9
Elizabeth Usher memorial lecture. Models, mind maps, and metacognition: How theory is the true hero.伊丽莎白·厄舍纪念讲座。模型、思维导图和元认知:理论如何成为真正的英雄。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Jun;26(3):304-316. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2024.2369146. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
10
Towards efficient, ecological assessment of interaction: A scoping review of co-constructed communication.走向高效、生态的互动评估:协同构建沟通的范围综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):831-875. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12957. Epub 2023 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Access to context-specific lexical-semantic information during discourse tasks differentiates speakers with latent aphasia, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitively healthy adults.在话语任务中获取特定语境的词汇语义信息,可区分患有潜在失语症、轻度认知障碍的说话者以及认知健康的成年人。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jan 22;18:1500735. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1500735. eCollection 2024.
2
Expanding the scope: multimodal dimensions in aphasia discourse analysis-preliminary findings.拓展范围:失语症话语分析中的多模态维度——初步研究结果
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Sep 25;18:1419311. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1419311. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of aphasia on communication in couples.失语症对夫妻沟通的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 Jul;55(4):547-557. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12537. Epub 2020 May 13.
2
UK speech and language therapists' views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation.英国言语治疗师在失语症康复中对话语分析的看法和报告的实践。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 May;55(3):417-442. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12528. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
3
A Theory-Driven System for the Specification of Rehabilitation Treatments.一种基于理论的康复治疗规范系统。
Determinants of Multilevel Discourse Outcomes in Anomia Treatment for Aphasia.
失语症命名障碍治疗中多层次话语结果的决定因素。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Sep 12;67(9):3094-3112. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00030. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
4
A feasibility randomised waitlist-controlled trial of a personalised multi-level language treatment for people with aphasia: The remote LUNA study.一项针对失语症患者的个性化多层次语言治疗的可行性随机候补对照试验:远程 LUNA 研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 14;19(6):e0304385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304385. eCollection 2024.
5
Validation of a Cantonese Version of the Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (CANELT): A functional approach.中文验证:阿姆斯特丹-奈梅亨日常语言测试(CANELT)的粤语版本:一种功能方法。
PLoS One. 2024 May 24;19(5):e0303810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303810. eCollection 2024.
6
A bibliometrix-based visualization analysis of international studies on conversations of people with aphasia: Present and prospects.基于文献计量学的失语症患者对话国际研究可视化分析:现状与展望
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 2;9(6):e16839. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16839. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Editorial: New Perspectives and Methodologies in the Diagnosis and Rehabilitation of Aphasia.社论:失语症诊断与康复的新视角与方法
Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 14;11(11):1508. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111508.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;100(1):172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.09.109. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
4
Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia.失语症中话语信息测量质量的综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Nov;52(6):689-732. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12318. Epub 2017 May 31.
5
Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: A review of the literature.失语症话语的语言分析:文献综述
Clin Linguist Phon. 2016;30(7):489-518. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2016.1145740. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.理解实施理论、模型和框架。
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.
7
Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews.进行知识构建和理论生成的定性系统评价的文献检索策略。
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Jan;69(1):194-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06037.x. Epub 2012 May 17.
8
Narrative discourse in anomic aphasia.失名性失语症中的叙事话语。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):1787-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 May 5.
9
Attention and other cognitive deficits in aphasia: presence and relation to language and communication measures.失语症的注意和其他认知缺陷:存在及其与语言和交际测量的关系。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 May;21(2):S51-64. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0067). Epub 2012 Jan 9.
10
Using narrative as a bridge: linking language processing models with real-life communication.以叙事为桥梁:将语言处理模型与现实生活中的交流联系起来。
Semin Speech Lang. 2010 Feb;31(1):64-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244954. Epub 2010 Apr 8.