Suppr超能文献

经导管与单纯外科主动脉瓣置换治疗纵隔放疗相关重度主动脉瓣狭窄的短期结局比较。

Short-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Isolated Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Mediastinal Radiation-Associated Severe Aortic Stenosis.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (V.N., P.B.S., P.S.S., P.O., A.N.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

Center for Clinical Investigation (C.B.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb;14(2):e010009. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.010009. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with radiation-associated aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may improve outcomes in this population.

METHODS

We evaluated 1668 TAVR and 2611 patients with SAVR enrolled in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' database between 2011 and 2018. Multiple logistic regression was used to compare 30- day outcomes between TAVR and SAVR. Propensity-matched analysis was performed to confirm results of the overall cohort. Additionally, the cohort was stratified into early (2011-2014) versus contemporary (2015-2018) TAVR eras, and 30-day outcomes for TAVR and SAVR were compared. Finally, outcomes with transfemoral TAVR versus SAVR were compared.

RESULTS

In the overall cohort, TAVR was associated with significantly reduced 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR]=0.60 [0.40-0.91]). Postoperative atrial fibrillation, pneumonia, pleural effusion, renal failure, and bleeding also occurred less frequently with TAVR. Stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA; OR, 2.03 [1.09-3.77]) and pacemaker implantation (OR, 1.62 [1.21-2.17]) were higher with TAVR. Propensity-matched analysis yielded similar results as the overall cohort. Following stratification by era, TAVR versus SAVR was associated with reduced 30-day mortality in the contemporary but not early era (OR, 0.78 [0.48-1.28]; OR, 0.31 [0.14-0.65]). Pacemaker implantation was higher with TAVR versus SAVR in both eras (OR, 1.60 [1.03-2.46]; OR, 1.64 [1.10-2.45]). There was also a nonsignificant trend towards increased stroke/TIA with TAVR during both eras (OR, 1.39 [0.58-3.36]; OR, 2.46 [0.99-6.10]). Finally, transfemoral TAVR (N=1369) versus SAVR revealed similar findings as the overall cohort; however, the association of TAVR with stroke/TIA was not statistically significant (OR, 1.57 [0.79-3.09]).

CONCLUSIONS

TAVR provides an effective and evolving alternative to SAVR for radiation-associated severe aortic stenosis and was associated with lower 30-day mortality and postoperative complications. TAVR was associated with increased pacemaker implantation and a trend towards increased stroke/TIA. In this unique population with extensive valvular and vascular calcifications, the risk of stroke/TIA with TAVR requires careful consideration and further investigation.

摘要

背景

在放射性主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)与不良预后相关。经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)可能改善此类人群的预后。

方法

我们评估了 2011 年至 2018 年期间,胸外科医生协会数据库中纳入的 1668 例 TAVR 和 2611 例 SAVR 患者。采用多因素逻辑回归比较 TAVR 和 SAVR 术后 30 天的结局。采用倾向匹配分析确认整体队列的结果。此外,将队列分为早期(2011-2014 年)和当代(2015-2018 年)TAVR 时代,并比较 TAVR 和 SAVR 的 30 天结局。最后,比较经股 TAVR 与 SAVR 的结局。

结果

在整体队列中,TAVR 与术后 30 天死亡率显著降低相关(比值比 [OR] = 0.60 [0.40-0.91])。术后心房颤动、肺炎、胸腔积液、肾衰竭和出血的发生率也较低。TAVR 术后发生卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA;OR,2.03 [1.09-3.77])和起搏器植入(OR,1.62 [1.21-2.17])的风险更高。倾向匹配分析得到了与整体队列相似的结果。分层后,当代而非早期时代,TAVR 与 SAVR 相比,术后 30 天死亡率降低(OR,0.78 [0.48-1.28];OR,0.31 [0.14-0.65])。在两个时代,TAVR 与 SAVR 相比,起搏器植入的风险更高(OR,1.60 [1.03-2.46];OR,1.64 [1.10-2.45])。在两个时代,TAVR 术后发生卒中/TIA 的风险均呈升高趋势,但无统计学意义(OR,1.39 [0.58-3.36];OR,2.46 [0.99-6.10])。最后,经股 TAVR(N=1369)与 SAVR 相比,发现与整体队列相似的结果;然而,TAVR 与卒中/TIA 之间的关联无统计学意义(OR,1.57 [0.79-3.09])。

结论

TAVR 为放射性严重主动脉瓣狭窄提供了一种有效且不断发展的 SAVR 替代方法,与较低的 30 天死亡率和术后并发症相关。TAVR 与起搏器植入的增加相关,且卒中/TIA 的发生率呈增加趋势。在这个广泛存在瓣叶和血管钙化的独特人群中,TAVR 后卒中/TIA 的风险需要仔细考虑和进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验