• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项预测行复杂高危指征性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(CHIP-PCI)患者一年死亡率的新型风险评分。

A Novel Risk Score to Predict One-Year Mortality in Patients Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CHIP-PCI).

机构信息

Professor of Medicine, Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, New York Methodist Hospital, 506 6th Street, KP-2, Brooklyn, NY 11215 USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2021 Apr;33(4):E253-E258. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00515. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

DOI:10.25270/jic/20.00515
PMID:33542159
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify patients undergoing complex, high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) and compare their outcomes with non-CHIP patients. We created a CHIP score to risk stratify these patients.

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification of PCI patients remains difficult because most scoring systems reflect hemodynamic instability and predict early mortality.

METHODS

CHIP-PCI was defined as any of the following: age >80 years; ejection fraction <30%; dialysis; prior bypass surgery; treatment of left main trunk; chronic total occlusion; or >2 lesions in >1 coronary artery. The primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality. Logistic regression identified independent predictors of 1-year mortality and the odds ratios (ORs) for those predictors were used to create a CHIP score. Patients were then classified as low, intermediate, and high risk.

RESULTS

Among 4478 patients, a total of 1730 (38.6%) were CHIP. There were 85 deaths (2.2%) at 1 year (4.1% in CHIP patients and 1.0% in non-CHIP patients; P<.001). CHIP-PCI was an independent predictor of mortality (OR, 2.57; 955 confidence interval, 1.52-4.32; P<.001). Four CHIP criteria were independent predictors of mortality: age >80 years (3 points); dialysis (6 points); ejection fraction <30% (2 points); and number of lesions treated >2 (2 points). Accordingly, there were 2752 low-risk (score of 0), 889 intermediate-risk (score of 2-3), and 267 high-risk patients (score of 4-13). The 1-year mortality rates among these 3 groups were 1.24%, 2.47%, and 10.86%, respectively (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with non-CHIP, CHIP-PCI is associated with increased risk of 1-year mortality, which is particularly evident among those fulfilling >1 CHIP criterion.

摘要

目的

确定接受复杂高危指征性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(CHIP-PCI)的患者,并将其与非-CHIP 患者的结局进行比较。我们创建了一个 CHIP 评分来对这些患者进行风险分层。

背景

PCI 患者的风险分层仍然很困难,因为大多数评分系统反映的是血流动力学不稳定,并预测早期死亡率。

方法

CHIP-PCI 定义为以下任何一种情况:年龄>80 岁;射血分数<30%;透析;既往旁路手术;左主干治疗;慢性完全闭塞;或>1 条冠状动脉中有>2 处病变。主要终点为 1 年全因死亡率。逻辑回归确定了 1 年死亡率的独立预测因素,并用这些预测因素的比值比(OR)来创建 CHIP 评分。然后,患者被分为低危、中危和高危。

结果

在 4478 名患者中,共有 1730 名(38.6%)为 CHIP。1 年内有 85 例死亡(CHIP 患者为 4.1%,非 CHIP 患者为 1.0%;P<.001)。CHIP-PCI 是死亡率的独立预测因素(OR,2.57;95%置信区间,1.52-4.32;P<.001)。四项 CHIP 标准是死亡率的独立预测因素:年龄>80 岁(3 分);透析(6 分);射血分数<30%(2 分);以及治疗的病变数>2(2 分)。因此,有 2752 名低危患者(评分 0)、889 名中危患者(评分 2-3)和 267 名高危患者(评分 4-13)。这 3 组患者的 1 年死亡率分别为 1.24%、2.47%和 10.86%(P<.001)。

结论

与非-CHIP 相比,CHIP-PCI 与 1 年死亡率增加相关,尤其是在满足>1 项 CHIP 标准的患者中更为明显。

相似文献

1
A Novel Risk Score to Predict One-Year Mortality in Patients Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CHIP-PCI).一项预测行复杂高危指征性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(CHIP-PCI)患者一年死亡率的新型风险评分。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2021 Apr;33(4):E253-E258. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00515. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of All-Cause Mortality After Complex High-Risk and Indicated Revascularization Using Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗复杂高危和有指征血运重建后的全因死亡率的临床结局和预测因素。
Int Heart J. 2023;64(4):570-576. doi: 10.1536/ihj.22-710.
3
Short- and Mid-Term Outcomes of Complex and High-Risk Versus Standard Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者中复杂高危与标准经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的短期和中期结局。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2023 Feb;35(2):E92-E98. doi: 10.25270/jic/22.00254. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
4
Impact of severity of renal dysfunction on determinants of in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.肾功能不全严重程度对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者住院死亡率相关因素的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Sep 1;80(3):352-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23394. Epub 2012 May 4.
5
Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery according to the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) score.根据紫杉醇药物洗脱支架冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏外科手术协同评分(SYNTAX评分)评估无保护左主干冠状动脉介入治疗的长期预后
Coron Artery Dis. 2020 Jun;31(4):336-341. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000846.
6
Predicting 3-year mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: updated logistic clinical SYNTAX score based on patient-level data from 7 contemporary stent trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 3 年死亡率预测:基于 7 项当代支架试验患者水平数据的更新逻辑临床 SYNTAX 评分。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May;7(5):464-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.007.
7
Defining Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complexity and Risk: An Analysis of the United Kingdom BCIS Database 2006-2016.定义经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的复杂性和风险:对英国 BCIS 数据库 2006-2016 年的分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.039.
8
Outcomes Prediction in Complex High-Risk Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in the Older Patients.老年复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结局预测。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 15;205:465-472. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.166. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
9
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
10
A Clinical and Angiographic Scoring System to Predict the Probability of Successful First-Attempt Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Total Chronic Coronary Occlusion.一种用于预测完全性慢性冠状动脉闭塞患者首次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗成功率的临床和血管造影评分系统。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Oct;8(12):1540-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of patients undergoing protected high risk percutaneous coronary intervention using either intravascular lithotripsy or rotational atherectomy.使用血管内碎石术或旋磨术进行保护性高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者比较。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Nov 29;11:1451229. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1451229. eCollection 2024.
2
Application of Drug-Coated Balloons in Complex High Risk and Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.药物涂层球囊在复杂高危及特定经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Feb;105(2):494-516. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31316. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
3
Mechanical Circulatory Support for Complex High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的机械循环支持
US Cardiol. 2023 Apr 4;17:e03. doi: 10.15420/usc.2022.26. eCollection 2023.
4
Effect of delayed hospitalization on patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and complex lesions undergoing successful new-generation drug-eluting stents implantation.延迟住院对成功接受新一代药物洗脱支架植入术的非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和复杂病变患者的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 26;13(1):16067. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43385-3.
5
Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Complex, High-Risk Indicated Procedure (CHIP) and High-Bleeding-Risk (HBR) Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: 4-Year Results.接受西罗莫司洗脱支架植入术的复杂、高危指征性手术(CHIP)及高出血风险(HBR)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床结局及预后因素:4年结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 15;12(16):5313. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165313.
6
Complex and high-risk intervention in indicated patients (CHIP) in contemporary clinical practice.当代临床实践中的有指征患者的复杂高风险干预(CHIP)。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2023 Jul;38(3):269-274. doi: 10.1007/s12928-023-00930-1. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
7
Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP.在适应证患者中比较复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(CHIP)与非-CHIP 患者的介入治疗结局。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Sep 1;30(9):1229-1241. doi: 10.5551/jat.63956. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
8
Optimized patient selection in high-risk protected percutaneous coronary intervention.高危受保护经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中患者的优化选择
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2022 Dec 8;24(Suppl J):J4-J10. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac060. eCollection 2022 Nov.
9
Complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention types, trends, and in-hospital outcomes among different age groups: An insight from a national registry.不同年龄段患者接受复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗类型、趋势及院内结局:来自全国注册登记研究的分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;100(5):711-720. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30366. Epub 2022 Sep 2.