• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西一家公立医院中女性对分娩的满意度。

Women's satisfaction with childbirth in a public hospital in Brazil.

作者信息

Lopes Fernanda, Nakamura Mary Uchiyama, Nomura Roseli Mieko Yamamoto

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Birth. 2021 Jun;48(2):251-256. doi: 10.1111/birt.12534. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1111/birt.12534
PMID:33543497
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate women's satisfaction with vaginal birth in a public hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.

METHODS

A total of 372 low-risk postpartum women were interviewed. Maternal satisfaction was measured by the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale (MCSRS), validated to Brazilian Portuguese. The scale is divided into six subscales: self-evaluation, partner, baby, nursing, physicians, and overall satisfaction. Childbirth care data were related to maternal mobility, shower bath, birth ball exercises, manual massage, and the health care providers assisting delivery.

RESULTS

The MCSRS total score was significantly higher in women living with their partners than those not living with a partner (median 145.5 vs 133.0; P = 0.019), in women with a companion during childbirth than those with no labor support (146.0 vs 136.5; P = 0.047), and in women who early breastfed within the first hour compared with those who did not (146.0 vs 137.0; P = 0.001). Multiple regression identified 'living with partner' (coefficient 6.205; P = 0.043) and 'breastfeeding within the first hour' (coefficient 7.856; P = 0.005) as independent variables that determine the total score of MCSRS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that living with one's partner and early initiation of breastfeeding are key factors enhancing satisfaction with vaginal birth in women who received care at a public Brazilian hospital.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估巴西圣保罗一家公立医院中女性对阴道分娩的满意度。

方法

共对372名低风险产后女性进行了访谈。采用经巴西葡萄牙语验证的麦基分娩满意度量表(MCSRS)来衡量产妇满意度。该量表分为六个子量表:自我评估、伴侣、婴儿、护理、医生以及总体满意度。分娩护理数据与产妇活动能力、淋浴、分娩球运动、手动按摩以及协助分娩的医护人员有关。

结果

与伴侣同住的女性的MCSRS总分显著高于未与伴侣同住的女性(中位数145.5对133.0;P = 0.019),分娩时有陪伴的女性高于无分娩支持的女性(146.0对136.5;P = 0.047),产后一小时内进行早期母乳喂养的女性高于未进行早期母乳喂养的女性(146.0对137.0;P = 0.001)。多元回归分析确定“与伴侣同住”(系数6.205;P = 0.043)和“产后一小时内进行母乳喂养”(系数7.856;P = 0.005)为决定MCSRS总分的独立变量。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,与伴侣同住以及早期开始母乳喂养是提高在巴西一家公立医院接受护理的女性对阴道分娩满意度的关键因素。

相似文献

1
Women's satisfaction with childbirth in a public hospital in Brazil.巴西一家公立医院中女性对分娩的满意度。
Birth. 2021 Jun;48(2):251-256. doi: 10.1111/birt.12534. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
Psychometric properties of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale cross-culturally adapted to Brazilian Portuguese.Mackey 分娩满意度量表经跨文化调适后用于巴西葡萄牙语的心理测量学特性。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Jul;34(13):2173-2179. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1660763. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
3
Satisfaction of adolescent mothers with childbirth care at a public maternity hospital.公立妇产医院中青少年母亲对分娩护理的满意度。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Feb;45(2):443-449. doi: 10.1111/jog.13841. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
4
Factors associated with a positive childbirth experience in Brazilian women: A cross-sectional study.与巴西女性分娩体验呈正相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
Women Birth. 2021 Jul;34(4):e337-e345. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
5
Evaluation of Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale in Iran: What Are the Psychometric Properties?伊朗麦基分娩满意度量表的评估:其心理测量学特性如何?
Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2016 May 21;5(2):e29952. doi: 10.17795/nmsjournal29952. eCollection 2016 Jun.
6
Revisiting the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale: Spanish adaptation, factor analysis, and sources of construct validity.重新审视 Mackey 分娩满意度评分量表:西班牙语版的适应性、因子分析和结构效度来源。
Birth. 2024 Jun;51(2):343-352. doi: 10.1111/birt.12790. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
7
[Women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: validation of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale].[女性对分娩经历的满意度:麦基分娩满意度评定量表的效度验证]
Gac Sanit. 2012 May-Jun;26(3):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.09.019. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
8
Validation of the Spanish version of Mackey childbirth satisfaction rating scale.西班牙文版麦基分娩满意度量表的验证
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Apr 16;16:78. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0862-7.
9
[Satisfaction with perinatal care in Vysočina region in the period between October 2013 and September 2014].[2013年10月至2014年9月期间维索基纳地区围产期护理满意度]
Ceska Gynekol. 2015 Dec;80(6):426-35.
10
Assessment of women's satisfaction with labor and childbirth at a teaching hospital.教学医院中女性对分娩过程满意度的评估。
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2022 Nov 4;43:e20210286. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2022.20210286.en. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal Satisfaction with Perinatal Care and Breastfeeding at 6 Months Postpartum.产后6个月时母亲对围产期护理及母乳喂养的满意度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 9;22(8):1246. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081246.
2
Major Factors Contributing to Positive and Negative Childbirth Experiences in Pregnant Women Living with HIV.影响感染艾滋病毒孕妇分娩经历好坏的主要因素。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;15(4):442. doi: 10.3390/bs15040442.
3
The Childbirth Experience of Pregnant Women Living with HIV Virus.感染艾滋病毒孕妇的分娩经历
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 14;14(6):1975. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061975.
4
The Childbirth Experiences of Pregnant Women Living with HIV Virus: Scoping Review.感染艾滋病毒的孕妇的分娩经历:范围综述
Children (Basel). 2024 Jun 18;11(6):743. doi: 10.3390/children11060743.
5
From global recommendations to (in)action: A scoping review of the coverage of companion of choice for women during labour and birth.从全球建议到(未)付诸行动:对分娩期间女性选择陪伴者覆盖情况的范围审查
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Feb 1;3(2):e0001476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001476. eCollection 2023.
6
Nonpharmacological Methods to Reduce Pain During Active Labor in A Real-life Setting.非药物性方法在真实情境下减轻活跃期产痛
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023 Jan;45(1):3-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759629. Epub 2023 Mar 6.