Suppr超能文献

接受电生理检查患者中自动体外除颤器对室性快速心律失常的敏感性。

Sensitivity of an automatic external defibrillator for ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients undergoing electrophysiologic studies.

作者信息

Carlson M D, Freeman C S, Garan H, Ruskin J N

机构信息

Clinical Electrophysiology Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1988 Apr 1;61(10):787-90. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)91067-3.

Abstract

An automatic advisory external defibrillator (AED) was activated during all arrhythmias occurring at the time of 77 electrophysiologic studies in 45 patients. Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) occurred during 55 studies in 31 patients and nonsustained VT was induced during 10 studies in 9 patients. Ventricular fibrillation was induced 5 times in 5 patients and atrial arrhythmias with a rapid ventricular response occurred during 7 studies in 4 patients. The AED detection algorithm advised "shock" during 36 of 55 (65%) episodes of sustained VT and all 5 episodes of ventricular fibrillation. The device correctly advised "shock" for all 6 episodes of nonsustained VT that spontaneously terminated after analysis was complete. Thus, the sensitivity of the device for all ventricular arrhythmias analyzed was 47 of 66 (71%). The device recommended "shock" for all 31 episodes of rapid VT and 1 of 2 episodes of atrial fibrillation associated with systemic hypotension (32 of 33, 97%). The 19 episodes of VT for which "no shock" was advised were comparatively slow and were hemodynamically well tolerated. The device recommended "no shock" during all 21 episodes of normal sinus rhythm and all 20 episodes of rapid atrial pacing (cycle length 400 ms) analyzed. "No shock" was advised during 4 episodes of sustained narrow QRS complex supraventricular tachycardia and 4 brief episodes of nonsustained VT that terminated before analysis was complete. Thus, in this study the specificity of the AED for wide complex tachycardias was 100%.

摘要

在45例患者进行的77次电生理研究过程中,所有心律失常发作时均启动了自动体外除颤器(AED)。31例患者在55次研究中发生持续性室性心动过速(VT),9例患者在10次研究中诱发非持续性VT。5例患者诱发了5次心室颤动,4例患者在7次研究中发生伴有快速心室反应的房性心律失常。在55次持续性VT发作中的36次(65%)以及所有5次心室颤动发作中,AED检测算法建议“电击”。对于分析完成后自发终止的所有6次非持续性VT发作,该设备均正确建议“电击”。因此,该设备对所有分析的室性心律失常的敏感性为66次中的47次(71%)。该设备对所有31次快速VT发作以及2次伴有全身性低血压的心房颤动发作中的1次(33次中的32次,97%)建议“电击”。建议“不电击”的19次VT发作相对较慢,血流动力学耐受性良好。在分析的所有21次正常窦性心律发作以及所有20次快速心房起搏(周期长度400毫秒)发作中,该设备建议“不电击”。在4次持续性窄QRS波群室上性心动过速发作以及4次在分析完成前终止的非持续性VT短暂发作中,建议“不电击”。因此,在本研究中,AED对宽QRS波群心动过速的特异性为100%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验