Professor and Head, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences.
Senior Consultant, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Kailash Hospital, Noida, India.
Immunohematology. 2020 Dec;36(4):133-136.
Unlike weak D and partial D, DEL represents a weakened form of D that cannot be detected by conventional serology and requires use of an adsorption-elution method for its detection; therefore, DEL+ samples might be mistyped as D-. The study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of the DEL phenotype among D- blood donors from northern India. A total of 1003 D- blood donors were tested for weak D and DEL by the indirect antiglobulin test and an adsorption-elution method, respectively. Of the total 21,135 blood donors typed for D, 20,132 (95.3%) were D+ and 1003 (4.7%) gave a negative reaction for D. Of the total 1003 D- samples, 8 (0.8%) were weak D and only 2 (0.2%) were DEL+ by adsorption-elution testing. For samples that typed as D-, the majority of individuals (91.1%) were cde/cde (rr) followed by dCe/dce (r´r) in 4.8 percent, and dCe/dCe (r´r´) in 2.2 percent. Both DEL+ samples were also C+. We conclude that the prevalence of the DEL phenotype as detected by serology in D- north Indian blood donors is 0.2 percent, although it is as high as 2.8 percent in D-C+ individuals. There is an association of DEL with C, which can be used as a cost-effective marker for screening large numbers of D- blood donors for DEL.
与弱 D 和部分 D 不同,DEL 代表 D 抗原的一种减弱形式,无法通过常规血清学检测到,需要使用吸附洗脱法进行检测;因此,DEL+样本可能被错误地定型为 D-。本研究旨在确定印度北部 D-献血者中 DEL 表型的流行率。共对 1003 名 D-献血者进行了间接抗球蛋白试验和吸附洗脱法检测弱 D 和 DEL。在总共 21135 名接受 D 型检测的献血者中,20132 名(95.3%)为 D+,1003 名(4.7%)对 D 反应阴性。在总共 1003 名 D-样本中,8 名(0.8%)为弱 D,仅 2 名(0.2%)通过吸附洗脱试验为 DEL+。对于定型为 D-的样本,大多数个体(91.1%)为 cde/cde(rr),其次是 dCe/dce(r´r)占 4.8%,dCe/dCe(r´r´)占 2.2%。这两个 DEL+样本均为 C+。我们得出结论,在印度北部 D-献血者中,通过血清学检测到的 DEL 表型的流行率为 0.2%,尽管在 D-C+个体中高达 2.8%。DEL 与 C 有关联,可作为一种经济有效的标记物,用于对大量 D-献血者进行 DEL 筛查。