• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有何新进展?一种有利于信息性的理解偏差。

What's new? A comprehension bias in favor of informativity.

机构信息

Linguistics & English Language, University of Edinburgh, UK.

Language Science, University of California Irvine, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2021 Apr;209:104491. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104491. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104491
PMID:33545512
Abstract

Language is used as a channel by which speakers convey, among other things, newsworthy and informative messages, i.e., content that is otherwise unpredictable to the comprehender. We therefore might expect comprehenders to show a preference for such messages. However, comprehension studies tend to emphasize the opposite: i.e., processing ease for situation-predictable content (e.g., chopping carrots with a knife). Comprehenders are known to deploy knowledge about situation plausibility during processing in fine-grained context-sensitive ways. Using self-paced reading, we test whether comprehenders can also deploy this knowledge in favor of newsworthy content to yield informativity-driven effects alongside, or instead of, plausibility-driven effects. We manipulate semantic context (unusual protagonists), syntactic construction (wh- clefts), and the communicative environment (text messages). Reading times (primarily sentence-finally) show facilitation for sentences containing newsworthy content (e.g., chopping carrots with a shovel), where the content is both unpredictable at the situation level because of its atypicality and also unpredictable at the word level because of the large number of atypical elements a speaker could potentially mention. Our studies are the first to show that informativity-driven effects are observable at all, and the results highlight the need for models that distinguish between comprehenders' estimate of content plausibility and their estimate of a speaker's decision to talk about that content.

摘要

语言是说话者传达信息的渠道之一,这些信息包括有新闻价值和有信息量的消息,即听话者原本无法预测的内容。因此,我们可能期望听话者对这类消息有偏好。然而,理解研究往往强调相反的观点:即对可预测情境内容(例如,用刀切胡萝卜)的处理更容易。众所周知,听话者在处理精细的上下文敏感信息时会利用有关情境可能性的知识。我们使用自定步速阅读来测试听话者是否也可以利用这种知识来支持有新闻价值的内容,从而产生信息驱动的效果,这些效果与可能性驱动的效果一起出现,或者替代可能性驱动的效果。我们操纵语义语境(不寻常的主角)、句法结构(wh-分裂句)和交际环境(短信)。阅读时间(主要是句子末尾)显示出对包含有新闻价值的内容的句子的促进作用(例如,用铲子切胡萝卜),这些内容在情境层面上是不可预测的,因为它们的非典型性,在词层面上也是不可预测的,因为说话者可能会提到大量的非典型元素。我们的研究首次表明,信息驱动的效果是可以观察到的,结果强调了需要区分听话者对内容可能性的估计和对说话者谈论该内容的决定的模型的必要性。

相似文献

1
What's new? A comprehension bias in favor of informativity.有何新进展?一种有利于信息性的理解偏差。
Cognition. 2021 Apr;209:104491. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104491. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
2
This Better Be Interesting: A Speaker's Decision to Speak Cues Listeners to Expect Informative Content.这最好有趣:演讲者决定发言会提示听众期待有信息量的内容。
Open Mind (Camb). 2022 Sep 1;6:118-131. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00058. eCollection 2022.
3
Discourse coherence modulates use of predictive processing during sentence comprehension.语篇连贯性调节句子理解过程中的预测加工使用。
Cognition. 2024 Jan;242:105637. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105637. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
4
Effects of contrastive focus on lexical predictability during sentence reading: The case of constructions.对比焦点对句子阅读中词汇可预测性的影响:构式的情况。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jan;74(1):179-186. doi: 10.1177/1747021820949155. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
5
Informationally redundant utterances elicit pragmatic inferences.冗余信息话语会引发语用推理。
Cognition. 2022 Aug;225:105159. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105159. Epub 2022 May 14.
6
Dissociable effects of prediction and integration during language comprehension: evidence from a large-scale study using brain potentials.语言理解过程中预测和整合的可分离效应:一项使用脑电波的大规模研究证据。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 3;375(1791):20180522. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0522. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
Anticipating the Damn Referent: How Comprehenders Rapidly Retrieve the Speaker's Attitude When Processing Negative Expressive Adjectives.预期那个讨厌的指涉对象:理解者在处理否定性情感形容词时如何快速获取说话者的态度。
Cogn Sci. 2023 May;47(5):e13295. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13295.
8
Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension.快速的预期适应在句法理解中。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e77661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077661. eCollection 2013.
9
Do we rely on good-enough processing in reading under auditory and visual noise?在听觉和视觉噪音下阅读时,我们是否依赖于足够好的处理?
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 24;18(1):e0277429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277429. eCollection 2023.
10
Does negation influence the choice of sentence continuations? Evidence from a four-choice cloze task.否定是否会影响句子延续的选择?来自多项选择 cloze 任务的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Jan;77(1):90-110. doi: 10.1177/17470218231158109. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Effects of a School Mindfulness-Based Intervention in French Primary Public Schools-A Pilot Study.探索法国公立小学基于正念的学校干预措施的效果——一项试点研究。
Pediatr Rep. 2025 Mar 5;17(2):31. doi: 10.3390/pediatric17020031.
2
Expecting the unexpected: Examining the interplay between real-world knowledge and contextual cues during language comprehension.预料之外之事:探究语言理解过程中现实世界知识与语境线索之间的相互作用。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Feb 6. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01689-x.
3
Does negation influence the choice of sentence continuations? Evidence from a four-choice cloze task.
否定是否会影响句子延续的选择?来自多项选择 cloze 任务的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Jan;77(1):90-110. doi: 10.1177/17470218231158109. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
4
This Better Be Interesting: A Speaker's Decision to Speak Cues Listeners to Expect Informative Content.这最好有趣:演讲者决定发言会提示听众期待有信息量的内容。
Open Mind (Camb). 2022 Sep 1;6:118-131. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00058. eCollection 2022.