Department of Geology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Trends Microbiol. 2021 May;29(5):394-404. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.12.010. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
DNA sequencing has led to an explosion in discovery of microbial phylogenetic novelty, especially that represented by uncultivated taxa, to which the traditional system of prokaryotic taxonomy has not adapted. A lack of expansion of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP, 'the Code') to effectively capture this information has created a 'wild west' situation where names are published or appear in popular reference databases without further verification or validation. The rapid propagation of variant and questionable naming methods has led to widespread confusion and undermines prior accomplishments. We exemplify inconsistencies that have arisen from this practice and endanger the interoperability of scientific findings. The immediate solution to this problem is to develop and adopt universal best practices that are accepted by expert researchers, major publishers, the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP), and international microbiological societies.
DNA 测序导致微生物系统发育新颖性的发现呈爆炸式增长,尤其是那些未被培养的分类群的新颖性,传统的原核分类学系统尚未适应这些新颖性。国际原核生物命名法规(ICNP,“法规”)没有扩大以有效捕捉这些信息,导致了一种“狂野西部”的局面,即在没有进一步验证或确认的情况下,名称被发表或出现在流行的参考数据库中。变体和可疑命名方法的快速传播导致了广泛的混淆,并破坏了先前的成果。我们举例说明了这种做法所产生的不一致性,并危及科学发现的互操作性。解决这个问题的直接办法是制定和采用专家研究人员、主要出版商、国际原核生物系统学委员会(ICSP)和国际微生物学会接受的通用最佳实践。