Suppr超能文献

两种方法在住院环境中实施舒适护理医嘱集的比较:一项整群随机试验。

Comparison of Two Methods for Implementing Comfort Care Order Sets in the Inpatient Setting: a Cluster Randomized Trial.

机构信息

Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.

University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):1928-1936. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06482-x. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing need for interventions to improve quality of end-of-life care for patients in inpatient settings.

OBJECTIVE

To compare two methods for implementing a Comfort Care Education Intervention for Palliative Care Consultation Teams (PCCT) in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs).

DESIGN

Cluster randomized implementation trial conducted March 2015-April 2019. PCCTs were assigned to a traditional implementation approach using a teleconference or to an in-person, train-the-champion workshop to prepare PCCTs to be clinical champions at their home sites.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred thirty-two providers from PCCTs at 47 VAMCs.

INTERVENTIONS

Both training modalities involved review of educational materials, instruction on using an electronic Comfort Care Order Set, and coaching to deliver the intervention to other providers.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Several processes of care were identified a priori as quality endpoints for end-of-life care (last 7 days) and abstracted from medical records of veterans who died within 9 months before or after implementation (n = 6,491). The primary endpoint was the presence of an active order for opioid medication at time of death. Secondary endpoints were orders/administration of antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and scopolamine, do-not-resuscitate orders, advance directives, locations of death, palliative care consultations, nasogastric tubes, intravenous lines, physical restraints, pastoral care visits, and family presence at/near time of death. Generalized estimating equations were conducted adjusting for potential covariates.

KEY RESULTS

Eighty-eight providers from 23 VAMCs received teleconference training; 44 providers from 23 VAMCs received in-person workshop training. Analyses found no significant differences between intervention groups in any process-of-care endpoints (primary endpoint AOR (CI) = 1.18 (0.74, 1.89). Furthermore, pre-post changes were not significant for any endpoints (primary endpoint AOR (CI) = 1.16 (0.92, 1.46). Analyses may have been limited by high baseline values on key endpoints with little room for improvement.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest the clinical effectiveness of palliative care educational intervention was not dependent on which of the two implementation methods was used.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02383173.

摘要

背景

需要采取干预措施,以提高住院患者临终关怀的质量。

目的

比较两种方法在退伍军人事务部医疗中心(VAMC)中实施姑息治疗咨询团队(PCCT)的舒适护理教育干预措施。

设计

2015 年 3 月至 2019 年 4 月进行的集群随机实施试验。PCCT 被分配到传统的实施方法,使用电话会议,或亲自进行培训,以培训冠军准备在其所在地担任临床冠军。

参与者

47 个 VAMC 的 132 名 PCCT 提供者。

干预措施

两种培训模式都涉及审查教育材料,指导使用电子舒适护理订单集,以及为向其他提供者提供干预措施提供辅导。

主要测量指标

事先确定了几个护理过程作为临终关怀(最后 7 天)的质量终点,并从实施前或实施后 9 个月内死亡的退伍军人的病历中提取(n=6491)。主要终点是死亡时是否有积极的阿片类药物医嘱。次要终点是抗精神病药、苯二氮卓类药物和东莨菪碱、不复苏医嘱、预先指示、死亡地点、姑息治疗咨询、鼻胃管、静脉输液、身体约束、牧师探访和家属在/接近死亡时间的存在。使用广义估计方程调整潜在协变量。

主要结果

来自 23 个 VAMC 的 88 名提供者接受了电话会议培训;来自 23 个 VAMC 的 44 名提供者接受了现场研讨会培训。分析发现,干预组在任何护理过程终点(主要终点优势比(CI)=1.18(0.74,1.89))均无显著差异。此外,任何终点的前后变化均不显著(主要终点优势比(CI)=1.16(0.92,1.46))。分析可能受到关键终点高基线值的限制,几乎没有改善的空间。

结论

研究结果表明,姑息治疗教育干预的临床效果不依赖于所使用的两种实施方法之一。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02383173。

相似文献

4
Opioid pain medication orders and administration in the last days of life.生命末期的阿片类止痛药医嘱和管理。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Nov;44(5):681-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.11.006. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
10
Continuation of non-essential medications in actively dying hospitalised patients.在处于濒死期的住院患者中继续使用非必需药物。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Dec;7(4):450-457. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001229. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

3
The Quality of End-of-Life Care among ICU versus Ward Decedents.ICU 与非 ICU 临终患者的临终关怀质量比较。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 1;201(7):832-839. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201907-1423OC.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验