Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Birmingham, AL and Atlanta, GA, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Oct;37(10):800-808. doi: 10.1177/1049909120907599. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
A growing body of research has examined modalities for delivering palliative care education; however, we know little about education and training preferences of VA interdisciplinary Palliative Care Consult Teams (PCCT). In the BEACON II study, we explored training preferences of PCCTs from 46 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) participating in either a multisite webinar or a small group, in-person workshop. We interviewed participants by telephone seven to eight month post-training. In all, 75.9% preferred in-person education and training, including 78.9% of workshop participants and 73.1% of webinar participants. Respondents described in-person training as fostering learning through the following processes: (1) active engagement and focus, (2) interaction and networking, (3) meaning-making and relevance, and (4) reciprocity and commitment. Although it is not possible for Web-based palliative care education programs to replicate all aspects of the in-person learning experience, building experiential, interactive, meaningful, and reciprocal components into Web-based education may help shift preferences and make interdisciplinary team-based palliative care education accessible to a larger audience.
越来越多的研究探讨了提供姑息治疗教育的模式;然而,我们对退伍军人事务部姑息治疗咨询团队(PCCT)的教育和培训偏好知之甚少。在 BEACON II 研究中,我们探讨了来自 46 个退伍军人事务医疗中心(VAMC)的 PCCT 的培训偏好,这些中心参与了多地点网络研讨会或小规模面对面研讨会。培训后 7 至 8 个月,我们通过电话对参与者进行了访谈。总的来说,75.9%的人更喜欢面对面的教育和培训,其中 78.9%的参与者参加了研讨会,73.1%的参与者参加了网络研讨会。受访者通过以下过程描述了面对面培训:(1)积极参与和专注,(2)互动和交流,(3)有意义和相关性,以及(4)互惠和承诺。虽然基于网络的姑息治疗教育计划不可能复制面对面学习体验的所有方面,但将体验式、互动式、有意义和互惠的组件构建到基于网络的教育中可能有助于改变偏好,并使基于跨学科团队的姑息治疗教育更容易为更多人所接受。