Suppr超能文献

知识分享以支持长期疾病自我管理——患者和医疗保健专业人员的观点。

Knowledge sharing to support long-term condition self-management-Patient and health-care professional perspectives.

机构信息

Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):628-637. doi: 10.1111/hex.13209. Epub 2021 Feb 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increased self-management is a suggested solution to the burden on health-care services of long-term conditions (LTCs). This requires effective sharing of knowledge between health-care professionals and patients, and is an underexplored area.

OBJECTIVE

To understand how patients and health-care professionals (HCPs) share and utilize knowledge in the social context of health-care interactions within long-term condition management.

METHODS

Thematic analysis of 93 hours of observations of health-care interactions and 33 semi-structured interviews involving patients, carers and HCPs.

RESULTS

3 themes were identified: normative social roles, differing professional roles and the value of knowledge. Knowledge sharing was a complex process heavily influenced by social and cultural norms within the health-care context. Not all knowledge was easily shared within routine health-care interactions.

DISCUSSION

The social context in which health-care is practised influences what knowledge is shared and how this is achieved. It favours sharing of clinical knowledge from HCPs to patients and disadvantages patients in their ability to share their unique knowledge based on lived experience of illness. The opportunities for patients to be supported in their knowledge, skills and confidence within routine health-care interactions are limited.

CONCLUSION

Both patients and HCPs need support to recognize the characteristics of the social context of health care and their understandings of their roles within this in order for them to move beyond accepted behaviours to develop more effective partnership working.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients were involved in initial design of the study, particularly ethics of ethnographic observation.

摘要

背景

增加自我管理是解决长期疾病(LTCs)对医疗服务负担的一种建议方案。这需要医护人员和患者之间有效共享知识,而这是一个尚未充分探索的领域。

目的

了解患者和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)如何在长期疾病管理的医疗保健互动的社会背景下共享和利用知识。

方法

对 93 小时的医疗保健互动观察和 33 次半结构化访谈进行主题分析,涉及患者、护理人员和 HCPs。

结果

确定了 3 个主题:规范的社会角色、不同的专业角色和知识的价值。知识共享是一个复杂的过程,受到医疗保健环境中社会和文化规范的严重影响。并非所有知识都能在常规医疗保健互动中轻松共享。

讨论

医疗保健实践的社会背景影响着共享哪些知识以及如何实现这一目标。它有利于 HCP 向患者共享临床知识,而不利于患者根据疾病的亲身经历来分享他们独特的知识。患者在常规医疗保健互动中获得知识、技能和信心支持的机会有限。

结论

患者和 HCPs 都需要支持,以认识到医疗保健社会背景的特点及其对自身角色的理解,以便他们超越可接受的行为,发展更有效的合作工作。

患者或公众的贡献

患者参与了研究的最初设计,特别是人种学观察的伦理学。

相似文献

1
Knowledge sharing to support long-term condition self-management-Patient and health-care professional perspectives.
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):628-637. doi: 10.1111/hex.13209. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
4
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
6
Self-care of long-term conditions: patients' perspectives and their (limited) use of community pharmacies.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Apr;39(2):433-442. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0418-y. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
8
Differences in perspectives regarding diabetes management between health care providers and patients.
Transl Behav Med. 2018 May 23;8(3):328-340. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby024.
9
Attitudes towards, facilitators and barriers to the provision of diabetes self-care support: A qualitative study among healthcare providers in Ghana.
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 May-Jun;13(3):1745-1751. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.03.041. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

1
What role does health literacy play in patients' involvement in medical decision-making?
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 3;12(3):e0173316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173316. eCollection 2017.
3
Confusion in and about shared decision making in hospital outpatient encounters.
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):287-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.012. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
4
Epistemic injustice in healthcare: a philosophial analysis.
Med Health Care Philos. 2014 Nov;17(4):529-40. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9560-2.
5
Re-thinking shared decision-making: context matters.
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 May;91(2):176-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
6
Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6. Epub 2012 May 23.
7
Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):780-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1109283.
8
Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005.
9
On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient interaction: a critical review.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(8):1374-82. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.033. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
10
Health literacy: what is it?
J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2:9-19. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.499985.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验