Villalba Laurencia, Larkin Theresa A
Graduate Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia; Vascular Care Centre, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Vascular Surgery, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Graduate Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Sep;9(5):1273-1281. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.01.015. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
The objectives of the present study were to determine the validity of transabdominal duplex ultrasound (TAUS) against the reference standard of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examinations for the detection of iliac vein obstruction (IVO).
We analyzed the data from patients at a private vascular laboratory who had undergone IVUS investigation with an intention to treat because of symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency and a high suspicion of IVO. These patients had also previously undergone a TAUS examination at the same location. The TAUS and IVUS planimetry measures of the left common iliac vein (CIV) were correlated. These included the TAUS-measured minimum and maximum diameter and the percentage of stenosis with the IVUS-measured minimum and maximum diameter and area and the percentage of stenosis.
The TAUS and IVUS data from 47 patients (83% female; age, 49.3 ± 17.3 years; 64% obese) were included in the analyses. We found 89% agreement between the TAUS and IVUS findings regarding the identification of left CIV stenosis of ≥50%. The TAUS data had a positive predictive value of 95.5%. The TAUS measures of the minimum diameter and percentage of stenosis correlated significantly with the IVUS measures of the minimum diameter, minimum area, and cross-sectional area of the percentage of stenosis. The strongest correlations were between the TAUS-measured minimum diameter and IVUS-measured minimum area and percentage of the area of stenosis according to the literature-derived value. The TAUS-measured vein diameter of 8 mm equated to an IVUS cross-sectional area of 94.2 mm (53% stenosis), and an IVUS cross-sectional area of 50% of stenosis equated to a TAUS diameter of 8.56 mm.
The findings from the present study support the validity of TAUS evaluation as a workup diagnostic tool for the detection of IVO. Our findings also support the use of TAUS planimetry-in particular, the CIV diameter of ≤8 mm as a threshold value-to indicate clinically relevant stenosis and trigger an IVUS investigation with an intention to treat, because this correlated with a cross-sectional area stenosis of ≥50%, as determined by IVUS examination.
本研究的目的是确定经腹双功超声(TAUS)相对于血管内超声(IVUS)检查这一参考标准在检测髂静脉阻塞(IVO)方面的有效性。
我们分析了一家私立血管实验室中因慢性静脉功能不全症状且高度怀疑IVO而接受IVUS检查以进行治疗的患者数据。这些患者此前也在同一地点接受过TAUS检查。对左髂总静脉(CIV)的TAUS和IVUS平面测量值进行相关性分析。这些测量值包括TAUS测量的最小和最大直径以及狭窄百分比,以及IVUS测量的最小和最大直径、面积以及狭窄百分比。
分析纳入了47例患者(83%为女性;年龄49.3±17.3岁;64%为肥胖患者)的TAUS和IVUS数据。我们发现,在识别左CIV狭窄≥50%方面,TAUS和IVUS结果的一致性为89%。TAUS数据的阳性预测值为95.5%。TAUS测量的最小直径和狭窄百分比与IVUS测量的最小直径、最小面积以及狭窄百分比的横截面积显著相关。根据文献得出的值,最强的相关性存在于TAUS测量的最小直径与IVUS测量的最小面积以及狭窄面积百分比之间。TAUS测量的静脉直径8毫米相当于IVUS横截面积94.2平方毫米(狭窄53%),而IVUS狭窄50%的横截面积相当于TAUS直径8.56毫米。
本研究结果支持TAUS评估作为检测IVO的初步诊断工具的有效性。我们的研究结果还支持使用TAUS平面测量法——特别是将CIV直径≤8毫米作为阈值——来指示临床相关狭窄并触发旨在治疗的IVUS检查,因为这与IVUS检查确定的横截面积狭窄≥50%相关。