Suppr超能文献

保乳术后常规切缘修整术:是敌是友?

Routine cavity shaves following breast conserving surgery; friend or foe?

机构信息

St Albans Hospital Breast Unit, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.

St Albans Hospital Breast Unit, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.

出版信息

Surg Oncol. 2021 Jun;37:101521. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101521. Epub 2021 Jan 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radial margin status is considered one of the most important prognostic predictor for patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCT), not only related to regional recurrence but also to 5y survival, especially in patients with invasive disease.

AIM

While our primary aim was to evaluate whether doing routine radial cavity shaves following at the time of primary conservative breast surgery will decrease the need for a second operation or not, our secondary aim was to assess time added to the operation to resect and mark the radial shaves, as well as patients' satisfaction with the results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We have conducted a case series prospective analysis, including158 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery looking into the histological status of resection margins and radial shaves, added time taken to take and mark the shaves as well as patients' satisfaction.

RESULTS

158 female breast cancer patients have been included in our analysis, the mean age was 56 years; total number of lesions was 160. While 89.3% of lesions were palpable, 10.6% were not requiring wire-guided localisation. Mean tumour size was 24 mm SD 7, final histology revealed that 86.8% lesion was invasive ductal carcinoma, 5.6% invasive lobular carcinoma, 1.2% medullary carcinoma. 12.4% had invasive disease as well as DCIS, and 1.8% had DCIS only with no invasive disease. Mean preoperative breast volume was 723 ml, Mean wide local excision specimen weight was 73 g, and mean shave weight was 1.6 g. Total number of radial margins was 640, 81.8% was clear, 14.6% was close, and 3.4% was involved. Total number of shaves was 640 out of which 98.7% was clear 0.7% was close and 0.4% was involved. Out of the 160 lesions, 3.7% required a second procedure to clear margins, out of which 2.5% had re-excision for close or involved single shaves each while 1.2% had mastectomy due to close or involved two shaves each. Average time utilised in resection of radial shaves and marking was 7 min 0.6% of patients developed a haematoma, 1.8% had a Seroma, and 1.2% had wound infection. Mean hospital stay was 1day SD 1.

CONCLUSION

Routine radial cavity shaves not only ensure microscopic clearance, reduce the need for re-excision with no significant added operating time but also has no impact on patients' satisfaction.

摘要

背景

切缘状态被认为是接受保乳手术(BCT)的患者最重要的预后预测因素之一,不仅与局部复发有关,还与 5 年生存率有关,尤其是浸润性疾病患者。

目的

虽然我们的主要目的是评估在原发性保乳手术时常规进行放射状腔隙刮除是否会减少再次手术的需要,但我们的次要目的是评估切除和标记放射状刮除所需的手术时间增加,以及患者对结果的满意度。

材料和方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性病例系列分析,纳入了 158 名接受保乳手术的女性乳腺癌患者,研究了切除边缘和放射状刮除的组织学状态、切除和标记刮除所需的时间以及患者的满意度。

结果

158 名女性乳腺癌患者纳入本分析,平均年龄为 56 岁;病变总数为 160 个。89.3%的病变可触及,10.6%需要导丝引导定位。平均肿瘤大小为 24mm,SD7,最终组织学显示 86.8%的病变为浸润性导管癌,5.6%为浸润性小叶癌,1.2%为髓样癌。12.4%的患者同时患有浸润性疾病和 DCIS,1.8%的患者仅患有 DCIS 而无浸润性疾病。术前乳房平均体积为 723ml,宽切标本平均重量为 73g,平均刮除标本重量为 1.6g。放射状切缘总数为 640 个,81.8%为清晰,14.6%为接近,3.4%为累及。放射状刮除总数为 640 个,其中 98.7%为清晰,0.7%为接近,0.4%为累及。在 160 个病变中,3.7%需要第二次手术以清除边缘,其中 2.5%的患者因单个接近或累及的刮除而再次切除,1.2%的患者因两个接近或累及的刮除而行乳房切除术。切除和标记放射状刮除的平均用时为 7 分钟,0.6%的患者发生血肿,1.8%发生血清肿,1.2%发生伤口感染。平均住院时间为 1 天,SD1。

结论

常规进行放射状腔隙刮除不仅可以确保显微镜下的切缘无肿瘤残留,减少再次手术的需要,且不会增加手术时间,还不会影响患者的满意度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验