Suppr超能文献

健康素养水平不同的人群参与研究的差异。

Disparities in Research Participation by Level of Health Literacy.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Center for Effective Health Communication, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Feb;96(2):314-321. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.06.058.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine at which phase in the recruitment process for participation in clinical research studies do health literacy and other patient characteristics influence recruitment outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using a sample of 5872 patients hospitalized with cardiovascular disease approached for participation in the Vanderbilt Inpatient Cohort Study from October 2011 through December 2015, we examined the independent association of patients' health literacy with two steps in their research participation decision-making process: (1) research interest - willingness to hear more about a research study; and (2) research participation - the decision to enroll after an informed consent discussion. Best practices for effective health communication were implemented in recruitment approaches and informed consent processes. Using logistic regression models, we determined patient characteristics independently associated with patients' willingness to hear about and participate in the study.

RESULTS

In unadjusted analyses, participants with higher health literacy, and those who were younger, female, or had more education had higher levels of both research interest and research participation. Health literacy remained independently associated with both outcomes in multivariable models, after adjustment for sociodemographic factors.

CONCLUSION

Because identical variables predicted both research interest and eventual consent, efforts to recruit broad populations must include acceptable methods of approaching potential participants as well as explaining study materials.

摘要

目的

确定在参与临床研究的招募过程的哪个阶段,健康素养和其他患者特征会影响招募结果。

患者和方法

我们使用了 2011 年 10 月至 2015 年 12 月期间因心血管疾病住院的 5872 名患者的样本,研究了患者健康素养与他们参与研究决策过程的两个步骤之间的独立关联:(1)研究兴趣-愿意听取更多关于研究的信息;(2)研究参与-在知情同意讨论后决定参与。在招募方法和知情同意过程中采用了有效的健康沟通最佳实践。使用逻辑回归模型,我们确定了与患者对研究的意愿和参与研究独立相关的患者特征。

结果

在未调整的分析中,健康素养较高的参与者,以及年龄较小、女性或受教育程度较高的参与者,其研究兴趣和参与研究的程度都较高。在调整了社会人口因素后,健康素养在多变量模型中仍然与这两个结果独立相关。

结论

由于相同的变量预测了研究兴趣和最终同意,因此招募广泛人群的努力必须包括可接受的方法来接触潜在参与者,并解释研究材料。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Effective Engagement Requires Trust and Being Trustworthy.有效的参与需要信任和值得信任。
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S6-S8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000953.
9
Effect of Health Literacy on Research Follow-Up.健康素养对研究随访的影响。
J Health Commun. 2015;20 Suppl 2(0):83-91. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1058442.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验