• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多重配型在肾脏分配系统时代的优势仍在延续。

The Advantage of Multiple Listing Continues in the Kidney Allocation System Era.

作者信息

Decoteau Mary A, Stewart Darren E, Toll Alice E, Kurian Sunil M, Case Jamie, Marsh Christopher L

机构信息

Scripps Center for Organ and Cell Transplantation, Scripps Clinic and Scripps Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of General Surgery, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2021 Mar;53(2):569-580. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.10.036. Epub 2021 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.10.036
PMID:33549345
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transplant candidates can be listed at multiple transplant centers to increase the probability of receiving an organ. We evaluated the association between multilisting (ML) status and access to a deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) to determine if ML provides a long-term advantage regarding wait-list mortality and recipient outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Candidates between January 2010 and October 2017 were identified as either singly or multiply listed using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data and cohorts before and after implementation of the Kidney Allocation System (KAS). Cross-sectional logistic regression was used to assess relationships between candidate factors and ML prevalence (5.4%).

RESULTS

Factors associated with ML pre-KAS included having blood type B (reference, type O; odds ratio [OR], 1.20; P < .001), having private insurance (OR, 1.5; P < .001), wait time (OR, 1.28; P < .001), and increasing calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) (reference, cPRA 0-100; OR for cPRA 80-98, 2.83; OR for cPRA 99, 3.47; OR for cPRA 100, 5.18; P < .001). Transplant rates were double for multilisted vs singly listed recipients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.16; P < .001). Extra-donor service area ML candidates received transplants 2.5 years quicker than single-listing (SL) candidates, conferring a 42% wait-list advantage. Recipient death (aHR, 0.94; P = .122) and graft failure (aHR, 0.91; P = .006) rates were also lower for ML recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the KAS era, ML continues to increase the likelihood of receiving a DDKT and lower the incidence of wait-list mortality, and it confers a survival advantages over SL.

摘要

背景

移植候选者可在多个移植中心登记,以提高获得器官的概率。我们评估了多中心登记(ML)状态与接受 deceased donor kidney transplant(DDKT)之间的关联,以确定 ML 在等待名单死亡率和受者结局方面是否具有长期优势。

材料与方法

利用器官获取与移植网络数据以及肾脏分配系统(KAS)实施前后的队列,将 2010 年 1 月至 2017 年 10 月期间的候选者确定为单中心登记或多中心登记。采用横断面逻辑回归分析来评估候选者因素与 ML 患病率(5.4%)之间的关系。

结果

KAS 实施前与 ML 相关的因素包括血型为 B(参照组为血型 O;比值比[OR],1.20;P <.001)、拥有私人保险(OR,1.5;P <.001)、等待时间(OR,1.28;P <.001)以及计算得出的群体反应性抗体(cPRA)升高(参照组为 cPRA 0 - 100;cPRA 80 - 98 的 OR 为 2.83;cPRA 99 的 OR 为 3.47;cPRA 100 的 OR 为 5.18;P <.001)。多中心登记受者的移植率是单中心登记受者的两倍(调整后风险比[aHR],2.16;P <.001)。额外供体服务区的 ML 候选者比单中心登记(SL)候选者提前 2.5 年接受移植,在等待名单上具有 42%的优势。ML 受者的受者死亡(aHR,0.94;P =.122)和移植物失败(aHR,0.91;P =.006)率也较低。

结论

在 KAS 时代,ML 继续增加接受 DDKT 的可能性并降低等待名单死亡率,并且与 SL 相比具有生存优势。

相似文献

1
The Advantage of Multiple Listing Continues in the Kidney Allocation System Era.多重配型在肾脏分配系统时代的优势仍在延续。
Transplant Proc. 2021 Mar;53(2):569-580. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.10.036. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
2
Association Between Declined Offers of Deceased Donor Kidney Allograft and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Candidates.接受或拒绝已故供体肾移植与肾移植候选人结局的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910312. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10312.
3
The national landscape of deceased donor kidney transplantation for the highly sensitized: Transplant rates, waitlist mortality, and posttransplant survival under KAS.高致敏受者的全国范围尸肾移植供体情况:KAS 下的移植率、等待名单死亡率和移植后存活率。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Apr;19(4):1129-1138. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15149. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
4
Posttransplant Outcomes for cPRA-100% Recipients Under the New Kidney Allocation System.新肾脏分配系统下 cPRA-100% 受者的移植后结局。
Transplantation. 2020 Jul;104(7):1456-1461. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002989.
5
Major Variation across Local Transplant Centers in Probability of Kidney Transplant for Wait-Listed Patients.不同地方的移植中心在等待移植的患者中进行肾移植的概率存在较大差异。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Dec;31(12):2900-2911. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020030335. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
6
Association of the kidney allocation system with dialysis exposure before deceased donor kidney transplantation by preemptive wait-listing status.预先候补等待状态与供体死亡前接受肾移植患者透析暴露的肾脏分配系统的相关性。
Clin Transplant. 2018 Oct;32(10):e13386. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13386. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
7
Impact of the new kidney allocation system A2/A2B → B policy on access to transplantation among minority candidates.新的肾脏分配系统 A2/A2B→B 政策对少数族裔候选人移植机会的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Aug;18(8):1947-1953. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14719. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
8
Estimating Waiting Time for Deceased Donor Renal Transplantion in the Era of New Kidney Allocation System.新肾脏分配系统时代已故供体肾移植等待时间的估算
Transplant Proc. 2016 Jul-Aug;48(6):1916-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.03.041.
9
Allocation of the Highest Quality Kidneys and Transplant Outcomes Under the New Kidney Allocation System.新的肾脏分配系统下最优质量肾脏的分配与移植结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 May;73(5):605-614. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.12.036. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
10
Decreasing deceased donor transplant rates among children (≤6 years) under the new kidney allocation system.新的肾脏分配制度下,儿童(≤6 岁)的已故供者移植率下降。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Jul;18(7):1690-1698. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14663. Epub 2018 Feb 7.