Division of Endocrinology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre/Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, Prédio 12, 4 andar, Porto Alegre, RS 90035-903, Brazil.
Division of Endocrinology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre/Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, Prédio 12, 4 andar, Porto Alegre, RS 90035-903, Brazil.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Mar;173:108688. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108688. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
To evaluate the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke associated with insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.
A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was performed. EMBASE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were searched for RCTs reporting mortality or cardiovascular events and comparing basal insulin to any treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. Data were summarized with Mantel-Haenzel relative risk (RR). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to evaluate the reliability of the results considering a 20% relative risk difference between treatments. PROSPERO Registry: CRD42018087336.
In total, 2351 references were identified, and 26 studies (24348 patients) were included. Most studies evaluated glargine insulin (69%), compared insulin to GLP-1 analogs (57%), and evaluated add-on therapy with metformin (77%). Insulin was not associated with increased all-cause mortality (RR 0.99; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.06), cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.91-1.13), myocardial infarction (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.92-1.15), or stroke (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.68-1.12). Insulin treatment increased severe hypoglycemia risk (RR 2.98; 95% CI 2.47-3.61). All analyses had low statistical heterogeneity. TSA confirmed these findings: optimal sample size (myocardial infarction), futility boundary (all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and stroke) and harm boundary (hypoglycemia) were reached.
Treatment with basal insulin of patients with type 2 diabetes does not increase the risk of cardiovascular events or death. Despite the increased risk of hypoglycemia, these findings reinforce that insulin is a safe option in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
评估 2 型糖尿病患者使用胰岛素治疗与全因和心血管死亡率、急性心肌梗死和卒中的相关性。
进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,纳入了比较 2 型糖尿病患者基础胰岛素与任何治疗方案的随机对照临床试验(RCT)。检索了 Embase、Cochrane 和 PubMed 数据库,以报告死亡率或心血管事件的 RCT。使用 Mantel-Haenzel 相对风险(RR)对数据进行总结。采用试验序贯分析(TSA)考虑治疗组间 20%的相对风险差异,评估结果的可靠性。PROSPERO 注册:CRD42018087336。
共检索到 2351 篇参考文献,纳入了 26 项研究(24348 例患者)。大多数研究评估了甘精胰岛素(69%),将胰岛素与 GLP-1 类似物(57%)进行比较,并评估了二甲双胍的附加治疗(77%)。胰岛素与全因死亡率增加(RR 0.99;95%置信区间 0.92-1.06)、心血管死亡率(RR 1.01;95%置信区间 0.91-1.13)、心肌梗死(RR 1.02;95%置信区间 0.92-1.15)或卒中(RR 0.87;95%置信区间 0.68-1.12)无关。胰岛素治疗增加严重低血糖风险(RR 2.98;95%置信区间 2.47-3.61)。所有分析的统计学异质性均较低。TSA 证实了这些发现:达到了最佳样本量(心肌梗死)、无效边界(全因死亡率、心血管死亡率和卒中)和危害边界(低血糖)。
2 型糖尿病患者使用基础胰岛素治疗不会增加心血管事件或死亡的风险。尽管低血糖风险增加,但这些发现强化了胰岛素是 2 型糖尿病治疗的安全选择这一观点。