Price Hilary I, Agnew Meghan D, Gamble John-Michael
School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 11;5(3):e006341. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006341.
To summarise the literature evaluating the association between different insulin regimens and the incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Systematic review.
Multiple biomedical databases (The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts) were searched from their inception to February 2014. References of included studies were hand searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies or case-control studies examining adults (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes taking any type, dose and/or regimen of insulin were eligible for inclusion in this review.
Primary outcomes were cardiovascular morbidity and mortality including fatal and/or non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal and/or non-fatal stroke, major adverse cardiac events and cardiovascular death. All-cause mortality was assessed as a secondary outcome.
Of the 3122 studies identified, 2 RCTs and 6 cohort studies were selected. No case-control studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies examined a total of 109,910 patients. Quantitative synthesis of the results from included studies was not possible due to a large amount of clinical heterogeneity. Each study evaluated cardiovascular outcomes across different insulin-exposure contrasts. RCTs did not identify any difference in cardiovascular risks among a fixed versus variable insulin regimen, or a prandial versus basal regimen, albeit clinically important risks and benefits cannot be ruled out due to wide CIs. Findings from cohort studies were variable with an increased and decreased risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality being reported.
This systematic review of randomised and non-randomised studies identifies a substantive gap in the literature surrounding the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of patients using different regimens of insulin. There is a need for more consistent high-quality evidence investigating the impact of insulin use on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
CRD42014007631.
总结评估不同胰岛素治疗方案与2型糖尿病成年患者心血管疾病发病率和死亡率之间关联的文献。
系统评价。
检索多个生物医学数据库(考克兰图书馆、PubMed、EMBASE和国际药学文摘)自建库起至2014年2月的文献。对纳入研究的参考文献进行手工检索。纳入本综述的研究需为考察2型糖尿病成年患者(≥18岁)使用任何类型、剂量和/或治疗方案胰岛素的随机对照试验(RCT)、队列研究或病例对照研究。
主要结局为心血管疾病发病率和死亡率,包括致命性和/或非致命性心肌梗死、致命性和/或非致命性卒中、主要不良心脏事件和心血管死亡。全因死亡率作为次要结局进行评估。
在检索到的3122项研究中,选取了2项RCT和6项队列研究。无病例对照研究符合纳入标准。这些研究共纳入109,910例患者。由于临床异质性较大,无法对纳入研究的结果进行定量综合分析。每项研究评估了不同胰岛素暴露对比下的心血管结局。RCT未发现固定剂量与可变剂量胰岛素治疗方案或餐时胰岛素与基础胰岛素治疗方案之间在心血管风险上存在差异,尽管由于置信区间较宽,不能排除临床上重要的风险和益处。队列研究的结果各不相同,有报告称心血管事件和全因死亡率风险增加和降低。
这项对随机和非随机研究的系统评价发现,围绕使用不同胰岛素治疗方案患者的心血管疾病发病率和死亡率的文献存在重大空白。需要有更一致的高质量证据来研究胰岛素使用对2型糖尿病患者心血管结局的影响。
CRD42014007631。