• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生保健系统中观特征与卫生保健利用的社会经济不平等之间的相关性:范围综述方案。

Correlation of mesolevel characteristics of the healthcare system and socioeconomic inequality in healthcare use: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Management, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany

Chair of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e044301. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044301.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044301
PMID:33550263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7925933/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although the impact of macrolevel characteristics of health systems on socioeconomic inequity in health has been studied extensively, the impact of access characteristics on a smaller scale of health systems has received less attention. These mesolevel characteristics can influence access to healthcare and might have the potential to moderate or aggravate socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use. This scoping review aims to map the existing evidence of the association of socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use and mesolevel access characteristics of the health system.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In conducting the scoping review, we follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews. The search will be carried out in four scientific databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO. Main eligibility criteria are inclusion in the analysis of a measure of socioeconomic position, a measure of individual healthcare use and a mesolevel determinant of access to healthcare services. The selection process consists of two consecutive screening stages (first: title/abstract; second: full text). At both stages, two reviewers independently assess the eligibility of studies. In case of disagreement, a third reviewer will be involved. Cohen's kappa will be calculated to report inter-rater agreement between reviewers. Results are synthesised narratively, as a high heterogeneity of studies is expected.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No primary data are collected for the presented scoping review. Therefore, ethical approval is not necessary. The scoping review will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal, and findings will be presented on national and international conferences.

摘要

简介

尽管健康系统的宏观层面特征对健康的社会经济不平等的影响已得到广泛研究,但健康系统较小规模的准入特征的影响却较少受到关注。这些中观层面的特征可能会影响医疗保健的获取,并有可能调节或加剧医疗保健使用方面的社会经济不平等。本范围界定综述旨在绘制现有证据,以说明医疗保健使用的社会经济不平等与健康系统的中观层面准入特征之间的关联。

方法和分析

在进行范围界定综述时,我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选报告项目扩展用于范围界定综述。搜索将在四个科学数据库中进行:MEDLINE(通过 PubMed)、Web of Science、Scopus 和 PsycINFO。主要入选标准是纳入社会经济地位的衡量指标、个体医疗保健使用的衡量指标以及医疗服务准入的中观层面决定因素的分析。选择过程包括两个连续的筛选阶段(第一阶段:标题/摘要;第二阶段:全文)。在这两个阶段,两名评审员独立评估研究的合格性。如果存在分歧,将邀请第三名评审员参与。将计算 Cohen's kappa 以报告评审员之间的评分者间一致性。由于预计研究之间存在高度异质性,因此将以叙述性方式综合结果。

伦理和传播

本范围界定综述不收集原始数据。因此,不需要伦理批准。该范围界定综述将在国际同行评议期刊上发表,并将在国家和国际会议上介绍研究结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc4/7925933/7dd2d459b9eb/bmjopen-2020-044301f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc4/7925933/7dd2d459b9eb/bmjopen-2020-044301f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc4/7925933/7dd2d459b9eb/bmjopen-2020-044301f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Correlation of mesolevel characteristics of the healthcare system and socioeconomic inequality in healthcare use: a scoping review protocol.卫生保健系统中观特征与卫生保健利用的社会经济不平等之间的相关性:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e044301. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044301.
2
The role of mesolevel characteristics of the health care system and socioeconomic factors on health care use - results of a scoping review.卫生保健系统中观特征与社会经济因素对卫生保健利用的作用——范围综述结果。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Feb 23;23(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02122-6.
3
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Associations between contextual and compositional characteristics of early childcare facilities with health, health behaviours and well-being among young children aged 06 years: protocol for a scoping review.0至6岁幼儿早期保育设施的环境与构成特征与健康、健康行为及幸福感之间的关联:一项范围综述的方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 10;10(9):e037038. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037038.
6
Characteristics of quality improvement interventions to improve physical healthcare in mental health settings: a scoping review protocol.改善精神卫生环境中身体保健质量的改进干预措施的特征:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 22;14(7):e083753. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083753.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: a scoping review protocol.运用积极偏差方法改善医疗保健系统服务:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 14;13(12):e078809. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078809.
9
Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare worker support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a protocol for a scoping review.卫生组织发生患者安全事件后有效实施医护人员支持干预措施的关键因素:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):e061543. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061543.
10
Use of health-related quality-of-life measures for Indigenous child and youth populations: a scoping review protocol.使用健康相关生命质量测量工具评估原住民儿童和青少年群体的健康状况:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 2;11(6):e043973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043973.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review of individual-level, community-level, and healthcare system-level factors contributing to socioeconomic differences in healthcare utilisation in OECD countries with universal health coverage.对经合组织国家中具有全民健康覆盖的国家的个人层面、社区层面和医疗保健系统层面的因素对医疗保健利用的社会经济差异的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 18;14(3):e080559. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080559.
2
The role of mesolevel characteristics of the health care system and socioeconomic factors on health care use - results of a scoping review.卫生保健系统中观特征与社会经济因素对卫生保健利用的作用——范围综述结果。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Feb 23;23(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02122-6.

本文引用的文献

1
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
2
Getting Under the Skin: Children's Health Disparities as Embodiment of Social Class.深入剖析:儿童健康差异作为社会阶层的体现
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2017 Oct;36(5):671-697. doi: 10.1007/s11113-017-9431-7. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
3
Micro, macro, but what about meso? The institutional context of health inequalities.
微观、宏观,但是中观呢?健康不平等的制度背景。
Int J Public Health. 2018 Mar;63(2):163-164. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-1064-4. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
4
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
5
Universal health coverage from multiple perspectives: a synthesis of conceptual literature and global debates.多视角下的全民健康覆盖:概念文献与全球辩论综述
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2015 Jul 4;15:17. doi: 10.1186/s12914-015-0056-9.
6
Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.进行系统范围综述的指南。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):141-6. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050.
7
From a conservative to a liberal welfare state: decomposing changes in income-related health inequalities in Germany, 1994-2011.从保守型福利国家到自由型福利国家:剖析1994 - 2011年德国收入相关健康不平等状况的变化
Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;108:10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.022. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
8
ISPRM discussion paper: Proposing a conceptual description of health-related rehabilitation services.国际物理医学与康复医学学会讨论文件:提出与健康相关的康复服务的概念描述。
J Rehabil Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):1-6. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1251.
9
Measuring inequalities in health: what do we know? What do we need to know?衡量健康不平等:我们知道什么?我们需要知道什么?
Health Policy. 2012 Jul;106(2):195-206. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 May 18.
10
Persistence in health limitations: a European comparative analysis.健康限制的持续性:一项欧洲比较分析。
J Health Econ. 2008 Dec;27(6):1472-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.06.007. Epub 2008 Jul 10.