• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从保守型福利国家到自由型福利国家:剖析1994 - 2011年德国收入相关健康不平等状况的变化

From a conservative to a liberal welfare state: decomposing changes in income-related health inequalities in Germany, 1994-2011.

作者信息

Siegel Martin, Vogt Verena, Sundmacher Leonie

机构信息

Berlin Centre of Health Economics Research, Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, H80, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany.

Department of Health Services Management, Munich School of Management, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Schackstraße 4, 80539 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;108:10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.022. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.022
PMID:24607705
Abstract

Individual socio-economic status and the respective socio-economic and political contexts are both important determinants of health. Welfare regimes may be linked with health and health inequalities through two potential pathways: first, they may influence the associations between socio-economic status and health. Second, they may influence the income-related distributions of socio-economic determinants of health within a society. Using the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) for the years 1994-2011, we analyze how income-related health inequalities evolved in the context of the transformation from a conservative to a liberal welfare system in Germany. We use the concentration index to measure health inequalities, and the annual concentration indices are decomposed to reveal how the contributions of the explanatory variables age, sex, income, education, and occupation changed over time. The changes in the contributions are further decomposed to distinguish whether changes in health inequalities stem from redistributions of the explanatory variables, from changes in their associations with health, or from changes in their means. Income-related health inequalities to the disadvantage of the economically deprived roughly doubled over time, which can largely be explained by changes in the contributions of individual characteristics representing weaker labor market positions, particularly income and unemployment. The social and labor market reforms coincide with the observed changes in the distributions of these characteristics and, to a lesser extent, with changes of their associations with health.

摘要

个人社会经济地位以及各自的社会经济和政治背景都是健康的重要决定因素。福利制度可能通过两条潜在途径与健康及健康不平等相联系:其一,它们可能影响社会经济地位与健康之间的关联。其二,它们可能影响社会中与健康相关的社会经济决定因素在收入方面的分布情况。利用1994年至2011年的社会经济面板数据(SOEP),我们分析了在德国从保守型福利体系向自由型福利体系转变的背景下,与收入相关的健康不平等是如何演变的。我们使用集中指数来衡量健康不平等,并对年度集中指数进行分解,以揭示解释变量年龄、性别、收入、教育和职业的贡献是如何随时间变化的。对贡献的变化进一步分解,以区分健康不平等的变化是源于解释变量的重新分配、它们与健康关联的变化,还是其均值的变化。随着时间推移,经济上处于劣势的人群在与收入相关的健康不平等方面大致增加了一倍,这在很大程度上可以由代表较弱劳动力市场地位的个体特征(特别是收入和失业)的贡献变化来解释。社会和劳动力市场改革与这些特征分布的变化相吻合,并且在较小程度上与它们和健康关联的变化相吻合。

相似文献

1
From a conservative to a liberal welfare state: decomposing changes in income-related health inequalities in Germany, 1994-2011.从保守型福利国家到自由型福利国家:剖析1994 - 2011年德国收入相关健康不平等状况的变化
Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;108:10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.022. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
2
Welfare state regimes and income-related health inequalities: a comparison of 23 European countries.福利国家体制与收入相关的健康不平等:23个欧洲国家的比较
Eur J Public Health. 2008 Dec;18(6):593-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn092. Epub 2008 Oct 16.
3
Determinants of changes in income-related health inequalities among working-age adults in Japan, 1986-2007: time-trend study.日本 1986-2007 年工作年龄成年人中与收入相关的健康不平等变化的决定因素:时间趋势研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Mar;81:94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.042. Epub 2012 Dec 22.
4
Changing health inequalities in east and west Germany since unification.自统一以来东德和西德健康不平等状况的变化
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jan;58(1):119-36. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00153-9.
5
Income and health in different welfare contexts: a comparison of Sweden, East and West Germany.不同福利背景下的收入与健康:瑞典、东德和西德的比较。
Scand J Public Health. 2013 May;41(3):260-8. doi: 10.1177/1403494812472264. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
6
Unsafe and unequal: a decomposition analysis of income inequalities in fear of crime in northern Sweden.不安全与不平等:对瑞典北部犯罪恐惧导致的收入不平等的分解分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Aug 1;17(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0823-z.
7
Socioeconomic inequalities in oral health in different European welfare state regimes.不同欧洲福利国家体制下的口腔健康的社会经济不平等。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Sep;67(9):728-35. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202714. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
8
Welfare state regimes, unemployment and health: a comparative study of the relationship between unemployment and self-reported health in 23 European countries.福利国家体制、失业与健康:23个欧洲国家失业与自我报告健康状况关系的比较研究
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Feb;63(2):92-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.077354. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
9
Changes in social inequality with respect to health-related living conditions of 6-year-old children in East Germany after re-unification.德国统一后东德6岁儿童与健康相关生活条件方面的社会不平等变化。
BMC Public Health. 2005 Jun 8;5:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-64.
10
Inequalities in oral impacts and welfare regimes: analysis of 21 European countries.口腔健康影响与福利制度的不平等:对21个欧洲国家的分析
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;42(6):517-25. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12119. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
An evolution of socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health in Korea: Evidence from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 1998-2018.韩国自评健康状况中社会经济不平等的演变:来自1998 - 2018年韩国国家健康与营养检查调查(KNHANES)的证据
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Jun 7;26:101689. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101689. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Is Redistribution Good for Our Health? Examining the Macrocorrelation between Welfare Generosity and Health across EU Nations over the Last 40 Years.再分配对我们的健康有益吗?检验过去 40 年来欧盟各国福利慷慨程度与健康之间的宏观关联。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Oct 1;49(5):855-884. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11257040.
3
The role of mesolevel characteristics of the health care system and socioeconomic factors on health care use - results of a scoping review.
卫生保健系统中观特征与社会经济因素对卫生保健利用的作用——范围综述结果。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Feb 23;23(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02122-6.
4
[Working poverty and self-rated health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study over time using 1995-2021 Socioeconomic Panel data].[新冠疫情期间的在职贫困与自评健康状况:利用1995 - 2021年社会经济面板数据进行的长期比较研究]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Aug;66(8):869-881. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03734-z. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
5
The role of consumer choice in out-of-pocket spending on health.消费者选择在医疗自付支出中的作用。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jan 31;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01838-1.
6
Development of gender inequality in self-rated health in the life-phase of raising children in Germany from 1994 to 2018 - A decomposition analysis of socioeconomic, psychosocial and family-related influencing factors.1994年至2018年德国育儿阶段自评健康方面的性别不平等发展——社会经济、心理社会及家庭相关影响因素的分解分析
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Jul 31;19:101183. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101183. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Trends and Changes in Socio-Economic Inequality in Self-Rated Health among Migrants and Non-Migrants: Repeated Cross-Sectional Analysis of National Survey Data in Germany, 1995-2017.流动人口和非流动人口自评健康的社会经济不平等趋势和变化:德国 1995-2017 年全国调查数据的重复横断面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 7;19(14):8304. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148304.
8
Who spends more to combat COVID-19 social risks and why?谁在应对新冠疫情社会风险方面投入更多,原因何在?
Int J Soc Welf. 2022 Apr 20. doi: 10.1111/ijsw.12535.
9
Health inequalities in Germany and in international comparison: trends and developments over time.德国的健康不平等状况及国际比较:随时间推移的趋势与发展
J Health Monit. 2018 Mar 20;3(Suppl 1):1-24. doi: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2018-036. eCollection 2018 Mar.
10
Correlation of mesolevel characteristics of the healthcare system and socioeconomic inequality in healthcare use: a scoping review protocol.卫生保健系统中观特征与卫生保健利用的社会经济不平等之间的相关性:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e044301. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044301.