• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越个体分诊:突发公共卫生事件中救命资源(如呼吸机)的区域分配。

Beyond Individual Triage: Regional Allocation of Life-Saving Resources such as Ventilators in Public Health Emergencies.

机构信息

Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street, OX1 1PT, Oxford, UK.

John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2021 Dec;29(4):263-282. doi: 10.1007/s10728-020-00427-5. Epub 2021 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1007/s10728-020-00427-5
PMID:33550480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7867404/
Abstract

In the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers in some countries were forced to make distressing triaging decisions about which individual patients should receive potentially life-saving treatment. Much of the ethical discussion prompted by the pandemic has concerned which moral principles should ground our response to these individual triage questions. In this paper we aim to broaden the scope of this discussion by considering the ethics of broader structural allocation decisions raised by the COVID-19 pandemic. More specifically, we consider how nations ought to distribute a scarce life-saving resource across healthcare regions in a public health emergency, particularly in view of regional differences in projected need and existing capacity. We call this the regional triage question. Using the case study of ventilators in the COVID-19 pandemic, we show how the moral frameworks that we might adopt in response to individual triage decisions do not translate straightforwardly to this regional-level triage question. Having outlined what we take to be a plausible egalitarian approach to the regional triage question, we go on to propose a novel way of operationalising the 'save the most lives' principle in this context. We claim that the latter principle ought to take some precedence in the regional triage question, but also note important limitations to the extent of the influence that it should have in regional allocation decisions.

摘要

在 COVID-19 大流行的第一波中,一些国家的医护人员被迫就哪些个体患者应接受潜在救生治疗做出痛苦的分类决策。大流行引发的大部分伦理讨论都涉及哪些道德原则应该成为我们对这些个体分类问题的回应的基础。在本文中,我们旨在通过考虑 COVID-19 大流行引发的更广泛的结构性分配决策的伦理问题来扩大讨论范围。更具体地说,我们考虑在公共卫生紧急情况下,国家应该如何在医疗保健区域之间分配稀缺的救生资源,特别是考虑到预期需求和现有能力的区域差异。我们将这个问题称为区域分类问题。我们使用 COVID-19 大流行期间呼吸机的案例研究,展示了我们可能在应对个体分类决策时采用的道德框架如何不能直接转化为这个区域层面的分类问题。在概述了我们对区域分类问题的一种合理的平等主义方法之后,我们接着提出了在这种情况下实施“拯救最多生命”原则的一种新方法。我们声称,后者原则在区域分类问题中应该优先考虑,但也注意到它在区域分配决策中应该具有的影响程度存在重要限制。

相似文献

1
Beyond Individual Triage: Regional Allocation of Life-Saving Resources such as Ventilators in Public Health Emergencies.超越个体分诊:突发公共卫生事件中救命资源(如呼吸机)的区域分配。
Health Care Anal. 2021 Dec;29(4):263-282. doi: 10.1007/s10728-020-00427-5. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
2
Ethical heuristics for pandemic allocation of ventilators across hospitals.医院间呼吸机分配的伦理启发式方法。
Dev World Bioeth. 2022 Mar;22(1):34-43. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12315. Epub 2021 May 2.
3
Allocation of scarce resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Jewish ethical perspective.COVID-19 大流行期间稀缺资源的分配:犹太伦理视角。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul;46(7):444-446. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106242. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
4
Allocation of Mechanical Ventilators During a Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study of Perceptions Among Japanese Health Care Workers and the General Public.大流行期间机械通气设备的分配:日本医护人员和公众对其认知的混合方法研究。
Chest. 2021 Jun;159(6):2494-2502. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.015. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
5
Clinical and Ethical Considerations in Allocation of Ventilators in an Influenza Pandemic or Other Public Health Disaster: A Comparison of the 2007 and 2015 New York State Ventilator Allocation Guidelines.在流感大流行或其他公共卫生灾害中呼吸机分配的临床和伦理考虑:2007 年和 2015 年纽约州呼吸机分配指南比较。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020 Dec;14(6):e35-e44. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.232. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
6
Strategies to Inform Allocation of Stockpiled Ventilators to Healthcare Facilities During a Pandemic.在大流行期间为医疗机构分配库存呼吸机的策略。
Health Secur. 2020 Mar/Apr;18(2):69-74. doi: 10.1089/hs.2020.0028. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
7
Prioritising 'already-scarce' intensive care unit resources in the midst of COVID-19: a call for regional triage committees in South Africa.在新冠疫情期间优先分配“本就稀缺的”重症监护病房资源:呼吁南非成立地区分诊委员会。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 22;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00596-5.
8
Developing a Triage Protocol for the COVID-19 Pandemic: Allocating Scarce Medical Resources in a Public Health Emergency.制定COVID-19大流行的分诊方案:在突发公共卫生事件中分配稀缺医疗资源
J Clin Ethics. 2020 Winter;31(4):303-317.
9
Awareness of ethical dilemmas enhances public support for the principle of saving more lives in the United States: A survey experiment based on ethical allocation of scarce ventilators.意识到伦理困境会增强公众对美国拯救更多生命这一原则的支持:一项基于稀缺呼吸机伦理分配的调查实验。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug;282:114171. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114171. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
10
Operational Recommendations for Scarce Resource Allocation in a Public Health Crisis.公共卫生危机中稀缺资源配置的操作建议。
Chest. 2021 Mar;159(3):1076-1083. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.246. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
What does "urgency" mean when prioritizing cancer treatment? Results from a qualitative study with German oncologists and other experts during the COVID-19 pandemic.在优先考虑癌症治疗时,“紧迫性”意味着什么?在 COVID-19 大流行期间,德国肿瘤学家和其他专家进行的定性研究结果。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul 15;150(7):352. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05863-7.
2
Preparing for the Worst-Case Scenario in a Pandemic: Intensivists Simulate Prioritization and Triage of Scarce ICU Resources.大流行中最坏情况的准备:重症医学专家模拟稀缺 ICU 资源的优先级排序和分诊。
Crit Care Med. 2022 Dec 1;50(12):1714-1724. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005684. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
3
Operation of a triage committee for advanced life support during the COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间高级生命支持分诊委员会的运作。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2022 Mar 16;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13010-022-00117-1.

本文引用的文献

1
An ethical algorithm for rationing life-sustaining treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic.一种在新冠疫情期间分配维持生命治疗的伦理算法。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Sep;125(3):253-258. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.028. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
2
Triage of critical care resources in COVID-19: a stronger role for justice.COVID-19 危重症资源的分诊:正义发挥更大作用。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Aug;46(8):526-530. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106320. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial.瑞德西韦治疗成人重症 COVID-19 的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心临床试验。
Lancet. 2020 May 16;395(10236):1569-1578. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31022-9. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
4
Equality or utility? Ethics and law of rationing ventilators.平等还是效用?呼吸机分配的伦理与法律
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jul;125(1):10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.011. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
5
Ethnicity and COVID-19: an urgent public health research priority.种族与2019冠状病毒病:一项紧迫的公共卫生研究重点。
Lancet. 2020 May 2;395(10234):1421-1422. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30922-3. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
6
Ventilator Triage Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic at U.S. Hospitals Associated With Members of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors.COVID-19 大流行期间美国医院与生物伦理计划主任协会成员相关的呼吸机分类政策。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Aug 4;173(3):188-194. doi: 10.7326/M20-1738. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
7
Projecting the demand for ventilators at the peak of the COVID-19 outbreak in the USA.预测美国新冠疫情爆发高峰期对呼吸机的需求。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1123-1125. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30315-7. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
8
Is ethnicity linked to incidence or outcomes of covid-19?种族与新冠病毒疾病2019的发病率或预后有关吗?
BMJ. 2020 Apr 20;369:m1548. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1548.
9
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Shanghai, China.中国上海 2019 年冠状病毒病的体外膜肺氧合治疗。
ASAIO J. 2020 May;66(5):475-481. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001172.
10
Covid-19: Patients who are improving could have treatment withdrawn if others could benefit more.新冠疫情:病情正在好转的患者,如果其他人能从中获益更多,其治疗可能会被中断。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 2;369:m1382. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1382.