From the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
From the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Dr. Sulaiman AlHabib Medical Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ann Saudi Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;41(1):36-42. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2021.36. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is an invaluable technique used in the evaluation of thyroid nodules.
Evaluate the concordance of results for consecutive FNA readings.
Retrospective, descriptive.
Two tertiary care centers.
Demographics were collected along with every FNA result and final pathology results for all patients (aged 9-90 years old) who underwent thyroid surgery from 2010 to 2017. The Bethesda system was used for cytology. Agreement levels were calculated and compared with final pathology.
Of 1237 initially included, 1134 had at least one FNA performed with results available for review.
For the 1134 patients, demographic and clinical data were collection and a comparison was made between the three FNA results; the highest agreement was between FNA 2 and 3 (53.6%); however, the kappa value was consistently low for all comparisons, indicating a poor level of agreement overall. Also, the risk of malignancy was higher in this study than in the 2017 Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology in FNA cytology categories I and II.
Repeating FNA biopsies yield different results every time; hence, there is a low level of agreement. The clinical decision should therefore include other important risk factors. Prospective studies could help shed more light on this topic.
Retrospective design.
None.
细针穿刺(FNA)是评估甲状腺结节的一项非常有价值的技术。
评估连续 FNA 读数结果的一致性。
回顾性、描述性。
两个三级保健中心。
收集每位患者(年龄 9-90 岁)的人口统计学资料和所有接受甲状腺手术的患者的每一次 FNA 结果和最终病理结果(2010 年至 2017 年)。使用 Bethesda 系统进行细胞学检查。计算一致性水平并与最终病理进行比较。
最初纳入的 1237 例患者中,有 1134 例至少进行了一次 FNA 检查,结果可用于复查。
对于 1134 例患者,收集了人口统计学和临床数据,并对三种 FNA 结果进行了比较;FNA 2 和 3 之间的一致性最高(53.6%);然而,所有比较的kappa 值都始终较低,表明总体一致性水平较差。此外,与 2017 年的 Bethesda 系统相比,在这项研究中,在 FNA 细胞学分类 I 和 II 中,甲状腺细胞学报告的恶性风险更高。
重复 FNA 活检每次都会产生不同的结果;因此,一致性水平较低。因此,临床决策应包括其他重要的风险因素。前瞻性研究可能有助于更深入地了解这一主题。
回顾性设计。
无。