Suppr超能文献

2017 年甲状腺细胞病理学报告的贝塞斯达系统。

The 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology.

机构信息

1 Departments of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.

2 Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions , Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Thyroid. 2017 Nov;27(11):1341-1346. doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0500.

Abstract

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) established a standardized, category-based reporting system for thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens. The 2017 revision reaffirms that every thyroid FNA report should begin with one of six diagnostic categories, the names of which remain unchanged since they were first introduced: (i) nondiagnostic or unsatisfactory; (ii) benign; (iii) atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS); (iv) follicular neoplasm or suspicious for a follicular neoplasm; (v) suspicious for malignancy; and (vi) malignant. There is a choice of two different names for some of the categories. A laboratory should choose the one it prefers and use it exclusively for that category. Synonymous terms (e.g., AUS and FLUS) should not be used to denote two distinct interpretations. Each category has an implied cancer risk that ranges from 0% to 3% for the "benign" category to virtually 100% for the "malignant" category, and, in the 2017 revision, the malignancy risks have been updated based on new (post 2010) data. As a function of their risk associations, each category is linked to updated, evidence-based clinical management recommendations. The recent reclassification of some thyroid neoplasms as noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) has implications for the risk of malignancy, and this is accounted for with regard to diagnostic criteria and optional notes. Such notes can be useful in helping guide surgical management.

摘要

《甲状腺细胞病理学报告的贝塞斯达系统(TBSRTC)》为甲状腺细针穿刺(FNA)标本建立了一个标准化的、基于分类的报告系统。2017 年的修订版重申,每一份甲状腺 FNA 报告都应该以六个诊断类别之一开头,这些名称自首次引入以来保持不变:(i)非诊断性或不满意;(ii)良性;(iii)意义不明确的非典型性(AUS)或意义不明确的滤泡性病变(FLUS);(iv)滤泡性肿瘤或疑似滤泡性肿瘤;(v)疑似恶性肿瘤;(vi)恶性肿瘤。其中一些类别有两个不同的名称可供选择。实验室应选择它喜欢的名称,并专门用于该类别。同义词(例如,AUS 和 FLUS)不应用于表示两种不同的解释。每个类别都有一个隐含的癌症风险,从“良性”类别的 0%到 3%到“恶性”类别的几乎 100%不等,并且在 2017 年的修订版中,根据新的(2010 年后)数据更新了恶性风险。作为其风险关联的函数,每个类别都与更新的、基于证据的临床管理建议相关联。一些甲状腺肿瘤最近被重新分类为具有乳头状核特征的非浸润性滤泡性甲状腺肿瘤(NIFTP),这对恶性肿瘤的风险有影响,这在诊断标准和可选注释中都有考虑。这些注释对于指导手术管理可能是有用的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验