Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Northern Thailand Radiation Oncology Group, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Northern Thailand Radiation Oncology Group, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Brachytherapy. 2021 May-Jun;20(3):543-549. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.12.010. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
This study aimed to evaluate retrospectively the treatment results when using various image-guided adaptive brachytherapy treatments for cervical cancer treated by radical radiotherapy.
From 2014 to 2017, 188 patients with cervical carcinoma were treated by whole pelvic radiotherapy plus four fractions of image-guided brachytherapy. Eight patients were excluded because of missing data. Consequently, 180 patients were analyzed. Of 180 patients, 92 were treated by CT-based brachytherapy (CT-BT), and transabdominal ultrasound-based brachytherapy (TAUS-BT) was used to treat another group. The treatment results and toxicity outcomes were evaluated by comparing the image-guidance techniques.
The mean follow-up time was 32 months (interquartile range 29.5-42 months). The mean age was 57 years (interquartile range from 50 to 65 years). In the CT-BT group, the mean cumulative doses to high-risk clinical target volume, bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 87.2 Gy, 84.0 Gy, 68.8 Gy, and 69.8 Gy, respectively. In the TAUS-BT group, the mean cumulative doses to the cervix reference, bladder, and rectum points were 84.0 Gy, 65.5 Gy, and 74.0 Gy, respectively. There were no differences in the 2-year local control rate (p = 0.88) and disease-free survival rate (p = 0.34) in both groups. No difference in gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity was observed in both groups, but there was higher vaginal toxicity in the TAUS-BT group compared with the CT-BT group (p = 0.03).
No difference in treatment results was observed between CT-based and TAUS-based approaches. However, TAUS-BT had higher vaginal toxicity in our retrospective analysis.
本研究旨在回顾性评估使用各种图像引导自适应近距离治疗宫颈癌根治性放疗的治疗结果。
2014 年至 2017 年,188 例宫颈癌患者接受全盆腔放疗加 4 次图像引导近距离治疗。由于数据缺失,排除 8 例患者。因此,对 180 例患者进行了分析。在 180 例患者中,92 例接受了 CT 引导下近距离治疗(CT-BT),另 92 例接受了经腹超声引导下近距离治疗(TAUS-BT)。通过比较图像引导技术评估治疗结果和毒性结局。
中位随访时间为 32 个月(四分位距 29.5-42 个月)。平均年龄为 57 岁(四分位距 50-65 岁)。在 CT-BT 组中,高危临床靶区、膀胱、直肠和乙状结肠的累积剂量分别为 87.2Gy、84.0Gy、68.8Gy 和 69.8Gy。在 TAUS-BT 组中,宫颈参考点、膀胱和直肠点的累积剂量分别为 84.0Gy、65.5Gy 和 74.0Gy。两组 2 年局部控制率(p=0.88)和无病生存率(p=0.34)无差异。两组胃肠道和泌尿生殖系统毒性无差异,但 TAUS-BT 组阴道毒性高于 CT-BT 组(p=0.03)。
在本回顾性分析中,CT 与 TAUS 两种方法的治疗结果无差异。然而,TAUS-BT 组的阴道毒性更高。