Suppr超能文献

人工关节感染的治疗选择——两阶段置换仍是金标准吗?

Treatment options in PJI - is two-stage still gold standard?

作者信息

Lazic Igor, Scheele Christian, Pohlig Florian, von Eisenhart-Rothe Rüdiger, Suren Christian

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum Rechts der Isar; Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2021 Jan 20;23:180-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.021. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful treatment for osteoarthritis with good clinical outcomes . Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in TKA has a low incidence between 0.5 and 3% but it is nevertheless one of the most dreadful complications . Two-staged revisions are considered to be the gold standard for revision in chronic PJI with infection eradication rates of over 90% . Recently, similar infection eradication rates after one-staged revision arthroplasty have been reported , raising the question whether the two-staged approach can still be considered the gold standard. We therefore performed a literature review to analyse the correlation of one-staged and two-staged TKA revisions with recurrent infection rates and functional outcomes. Studies concerning PJI treated by one- or two-staged revision published between 2000 and 2020 were retrieved by searching the databases PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 29 studies were included in this qualitative synthesis. Mean follow-up was at 4.9 ± 2.6 years. The mean infection eradication rate after one-staged revision vs. two-staged revision in TKA was 87 ± 8.8% vs. 83 ± 11.7%. The functional outcome measured by the mean Knee Society Score (KSS) of one-staged revision vs. two-staged revision in TKA was 80 ± 5.9 vs. 80 ± 3.9 points. One-staged revision arthroplasty in TKA appears to have similar infection eradication rates and functional outcomes compared to two-staged revision arthroplasty. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, since selection bias may have played a significant role. Several criteria to guide the surgeon in selecting the appropriate procedure have been described, but the current recommendations are based on poor evidence as randomized controlled trials are lacking . Two-staged revision remains a successful treatment option which is rightly the gold standard. However, there is a variety of cases in which one-staged revision is a viable alternative, where similar success rates and functional outcome can be expected .

摘要

全膝关节置换术(TKA)是治疗骨关节炎的一种成功方法,临床效果良好。TKA术后假体周围关节感染(PJI)的发生率较低,在0.5%至3%之间,但它仍然是最可怕的并发症之一。两阶段翻修被认为是慢性PJI翻修的金标准,感染根除率超过90%。最近,有报道称一期翻修关节置换术后的感染根除率相似,这就提出了一个问题,即两阶段方法是否仍可被视为金标准。因此,我们进行了一项文献综述,以分析一期和两阶段TKA翻修与复发感染率和功能结果之间的相关性。通过检索PubMed/Medline数据库和Cochrane系统评价数据库,检索了2000年至2020年间发表的关于采用一阶段或两阶段翻修治疗PJI的研究。29项研究纳入了该定性综合分析。平均随访时间为4.9±2.6年。TKA一期翻修与两阶段翻修后的平均感染根除率分别为87±8.8%和83±11.7%。TKA一期翻修与两阶段翻修通过平均膝关节协会评分(KSS)衡量的功能结果分别为80±5.9分和80±3.9分。与两阶段翻修关节置换术相比,TKA一期翻修关节置换术似乎具有相似的感染根除率和功能结果。然而,这些结果应谨慎解读,因为选择偏倚可能起到了重要作用。已经描述了一些指导外科医生选择合适手术的标准,但目前的建议证据不足,因为缺乏随机对照试验。两阶段翻修仍然是一种成功的治疗选择,理所当然是金标准。然而,在多种情况下,一期翻修是一种可行的替代方案,可以预期相似的成功率和功能结果。

相似文献

1
Treatment options in PJI - is two-stage still gold standard?
J Orthop. 2021 Jan 20;23:180-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.021. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
2
Success of staged revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in eradication of periprosthetic joint infection.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Mar;32(3):625-635. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.09.006. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
5
Single-stage revision in the management of prosthetic joint infections after total knee arthroplasty - A review of current concepts.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 May 24;52:102431. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102431. eCollection 2024 May.
8
The Outcomes of Hip and Knee Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Oct;38(10):2183-2187.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 10.
9
Functional outcome of two-stage reimplantation in patients with periprosthetic joint infection after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Int Orthop. 2019 Nov;43(11):2503-2509. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04296-z. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

6
Accuracy of a New Augmented Reality Assisted Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty: An In Vivo Study.
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Oct 29;30:101565. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101565. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
No shortening of the patellar tendon during two-stage total knee arthroplasty revision using articulating spacers.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4437-4441. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05545-6. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The Dark Side of Arthroplasty: Competing Risk Analysis of Failed Hip and Knee Arthroplasty With Periprosthetic Joint Infection.
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Sep;35(9):2601-2606.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.078. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
2
Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection of the Knee Causes High Levels of Psychosocial Distress: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020 Dec;21(10):877-883. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.368. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
3
The treatment of periprosthetic joint infection: safety and efficacy of two stage versus one stage exchange arthroplasty.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Mar;17(3):245-252. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1733971. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
5
Single vs 2-Stage Revision for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Mar;35(3S):S24-S30. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.051.
6
Two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty.
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Dec;7(Suppl 8):S261. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.126.
7
Outcome of single-stage versus two-stage exchange for revision knee arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic infection.
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Aug 2;4(8):495-502. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.190003. eCollection 2019 Aug.
9
Periprosthetic joint infection: current concepts and outlook.
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Jul 29;4(7):482-494. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180092. eCollection 2019 Jul.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验