Weaver Samuel R, Skinner Bethany D, Furlong Rhodri, Lucas Rebekah A I, Cable N Timothy, Rendeiro Catarina, McGettrick Helen M, Lucas Samuel J E
School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Front Physiol. 2021 Jan 21;11:609935. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.609935. eCollection 2020.
This study examined acute cerebral hemodynamic and circulating neurotrophic factor responses to moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICT), guideline-based high intensity interval exercise (HIIT), and sprint interval exercise (SIT). We hypothesized that the pattern of middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv) response would differ between interval and continuous exercise, with SIT inducing the smallest increase from rest, while increases in neurotrophic factors would be intensity-dependent. In a randomized crossover design, 24 healthy adults (nine females) performed three exercise protocols: (i) MICT (30 min), (ii) HIIT (4 × 4 min at 85% HR), and (iii) SIT (4 × 30 s supramaximal). MCAv significantly increased from rest across MICT (Δ13.1 ± 8.5 cm⋅s, < 0.001) and all bouts of HIIT (Δ15.2 ± 9.8 cm⋅s, < 0.001), but only for the initial bout of SIT (Δ17.3 ± 11.6 cm⋅s, < 0.001). Immediately following each interval bout, MCAv increased (i.e., rebounded) for the SIT (9-14% above rest, ≤ 0.04), but not HIIT protocol. SIT alone induced significant elevations from rest to end-exercise in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; Δ28 ± 36%, = 0.017) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF, Δ149% ± 162%, < 0.001) and there were greater increases in lactate than in either other protocol (>5-fold greater in SIT, < 0.001), alongside a small significant reduction at the end of active recovery in insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1, Δ22 ± 21%, = 0.002). In conclusion, while the nature of the response may differ, both guideline-based and sprint-based interval exercise have the potential to induce significant changes in factors linked to improved cerebrovascular and brain health.
本研究考察了急性脑血流动力学及循环神经营养因子对中等强度持续运动(MICT)、基于指南的高强度间歇运动(HIIT)和冲刺间歇运动(SIT)的反应。我们假设,脑动脉中速度(MCAv)反应模式在间歇运动和持续运动之间会有所不同,SIT引起的静息时增加幅度最小,而神经营养因子的增加将取决于运动强度。在随机交叉设计中,24名健康成年人(9名女性)进行了三种运动方案:(i)MICT(30分钟),(ii)HIIT(85%心率下4×4分钟),以及(iii)SIT(4×30秒超最大强度)。在MICT期间(Δ13.1±8.5厘米·秒,<0.001)和所有HIIT组次中(Δ15.2±9.8厘米·秒,<0.001),MCAv较静息时显著增加,但仅在SIT的初始组次中(Δ17.3±11.6厘米·秒,<0.001)。在每个间歇组次后,SIT的MCAv立即增加(即反弹)(比静息时高9 - 14%,≤0.04),而HIIT方案则未出现这种情况。仅SIT引起从静息到运动结束时血管内皮生长因子(VEGF;Δ28±36%,=0.017)和脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF,Δ149%±162%,<0.001)显著升高,且乳酸增加幅度大于其他任何方案(SIT中大于5倍,<0.001),同时在主动恢复结束时胰岛素样生长因子1(IGF - 1)有小幅显著降低(Δ22±21%,=0.002)。总之,虽然反应的性质可能不同,但基于指南的和基于冲刺的间歇运动都有可能引起与改善脑血管和脑健康相关因素的显著变化。