• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The management of error in ultrasound fetal growth monitoring.超声胎儿生长监测中的误差管理
Ultrasound. 2021 Feb;29(1):4-9. doi: 10.1177/1742271X20945749. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
2
An evaluation of systematic and random errors in ultrasound estimated fetal weight during serial ultrasound.连续超声检查中超声估计胎儿体重的系统误差和随机误差评估。
Ultrasound. 2023 Nov;31(4):259-265. doi: 10.1177/1742271X221139796. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
3
A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight.胎儿体重超声估计的系统评价。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;25(1):80-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.1751.
4
Evaluation of automated tool for two-dimensional fetal biometry.二维胎儿生物测量自动化工具的评估。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;54(5):650-654. doi: 10.1002/uog.20185. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
5
Fetal weight estimation by automated three-dimensional limb volume model in late third trimester compared to two-dimensional model: a cross-sectional prospective observational study.应用三维肢体体积模型自动估计妊娠晚期胎儿体重与二维模型的比较:一项横断面前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 May 8;21(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03830-5.
6
Impact of biometric measurement error on identification of small- and large-for-gestational-age fetuses.生物测量误差对小胎龄儿和大胎龄儿识别的影响。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;55(2):170-176. doi: 10.1002/uog.21909. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
7
Evaluating the accuracy and precision of sonographic fetal weight estimation models in extremely early-onset fetal growth restriction.评估超声胎儿体重估测模型在极早早发胎儿生长受限中的准确性和精密度。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Mar;99(3):364-373. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13745. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
8
Quality-improvement program for ultrasound-based fetal anatomy screening using large-scale clinical audit.基于大规模临床审核的超声胎儿解剖筛查质量改进计划。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;54(2):239-245. doi: 10.1002/uog.20144.
9
Comparison of conventional 2D ultrasound to magnetic resonance imaging for prenatal estimation of birthweight in twin pregnancy.比较传统二维超声与磁共振成像在双胎妊娠中产前估计胎儿体重的应用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):128.e1-128.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
10
Errors in ultrasound digital image distance measurements.超声数字图像距离测量中的误差。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000 Sep;26(7):1125-32. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(00)00249-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal iron nutrition during pregnancy and fetal intrauterine growth.孕妇铁营养与胎儿宫内生长。
Nutr J. 2024 Nov 9;23(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12937-024-01042-z.
2
Use of artificial intelligence in obstetric and gynaecological diagnostics: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.人工智能在妇产科诊断中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 8;14(5):e082287. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082287.
3
An evaluation of systematic and random errors in ultrasound estimated fetal weight during serial ultrasound.连续超声检查中超声估计胎儿体重的系统误差和随机误差评估。
Ultrasound. 2023 Nov;31(4):259-265. doi: 10.1177/1742271X221139796. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
4
Accuracy of Estimated Fetal Weight by Ultrasound Versus Leopold Maneuver.超声估计胎儿体重与 Leopold 手法的准确性比较。
Ultrasound Q. 2024 Mar 1;40(1):87-92. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000670.
5
Carotid total plaque area as an independent predictor of short-term subclinical polyvascular atherosclerosis progression and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.颈动脉总斑块面积是短期亚临床多血管粥样硬化进展及主要心脑血管不良事件的独立预测因子。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Jan-Dec;17:17539447231194861. doi: 10.1177/17539447231194861.
6
Innate and Adaptive Immunity-Related Markers as Predictors of the Short-Term Progression of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Middle-Aged Patients.先天和适应性免疫相关标志物作为预测中年患者亚临床动脉粥样硬化短期进展的指标。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jul 30;24(15):12205. doi: 10.3390/ijms241512205.
7
Impaired in vivo feto-placental development is associated with neonatal neurobehavioral outcomes.胎儿-胎盘发育受损与新生儿神经行为结局有关。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Apr;93(5):1276-1284. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02340-0. Epub 2022 Nov 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Are ultrasound foetal circumference measurement methods interchangeable?超声测量胎儿头围的方法可以互换吗?
Ultrasound. 2019 Aug;27(3):176-182. doi: 10.1177/1742271X19837307. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
2
International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.基于系列超声测量的胎儿生长国际标准:INTERGROWTH-21st 项目胎儿生长纵向研究。
Lancet. 2014 Sep 6;384(9946):869-79. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61490-2.
3
Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements.胎儿超声测量的内-间观察者变异性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;39(3):266-73. doi: 10.1002/uog.10082.
4
A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight.胎儿体重超声估计的系统评价。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;25(1):80-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.1751.
5
The importance of quality management in fetal measurement.质量管理在胎儿测量中的重要性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;19(2):190-6. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00549.x.
6
The importance of rigorous testing of circumference measuring callipers.精确测量周长的卡尺进行严格测试的重要性。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996;22(8):1117-9. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(96)00100-7.
7
Charts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal measurements.胎儿大小图表:3. 腹部测量。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Feb;101(2):125-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13077.x.
8
Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements.胎儿大小图表:2. 头部测量值。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Jan;101(1):35-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13007.x.
9
Quality assurance in obstetric ultrasound.产科超声质量保证
Br J Radiol. 1993 Oct;66(790):865-70. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-66-790-865.
10
Selection of appropriate ultrasound methods for the estimation of fetal weight.选择合适的超声方法来估计胎儿体重。
Br J Radiol. 1995 Apr;68(808):385-8. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-808-385.

超声胎儿生长监测中的误差管理

The management of error in ultrasound fetal growth monitoring.

作者信息

Dudley Nicholas J

机构信息

Radiation Protection & Radiology Physics, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound. 2021 Feb;29(1):4-9. doi: 10.1177/1742271X20945749. Epub 2020 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1177/1742271X20945749
PMID:33552222
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7844476/
Abstract

It is important to understand the uncertainty in fetal measurements when using them in the management of pregnancy. The aim of this essay is to provide background on errors and uncertainty, describing error sources and their potential impact, with guidance on improving accuracy. Errors can be systematic or random, arising from equipment, image plane selection, measurement method and caliper placement and influenced by image quality, training and experience. The uncertainty in measurements is larger than clinically significant differences in fetal size and growth. Errors can be reduced by implementing equipment acceptance testing, written procedures, training and audit.

摘要

在孕期管理中使用胎儿测量值时,了解其不确定性很重要。本文的目的是提供有关误差和不确定性的背景知识,描述误差来源及其潜在影响,并给出提高准确性的指导。误差可能是系统性的或随机的,源于设备、图像平面选择、测量方法和卡尺放置,并且受图像质量、培训和经验的影响。测量中的不确定性大于胎儿大小和生长方面具有临床意义的差异。通过实施设备验收测试、书面程序、培训和审核,可以减少误差。