• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的情况下会导致更高的手术切缘阳性率。一项前瞻性多中心研究的结果。

Obesity leads to a higher rate of positive surgical margins in the context of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Results of a prospective multicenter study.

作者信息

Goßler Christopher, May Matthias, Rosenhammer Bernd, Breyer Johannes, Stojanoski Gjoko, Weikert Steffen, Lenart Sebastian, Ponholzer Anton, Dreissig Christina, Burger Maximilian, Gilfrich Christian, Bründl Johannes

机构信息

Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Brothers of Mercy Hospital, Straubing, Germany.

出版信息

Cent European J Urol. 2020;73(4):457-465. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2020.0265.R1. Epub 2020 Dec 3.

DOI:10.5173/ceju.2020.0265.R1
PMID:33552571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7848833/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Current results concerning the effect of body mass index (BMI) on positive surgical margins (PSMs) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients with localized prostate cancer are inconsistent. Therefore, the aim of this study was to further analyse the association between BMI and PSMs after RARP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between March 2017 and December 2017 a multicentre, prospective, randomised, single-blind series with a blinded outcome assessment of 232 RARP patients was performed. Multivariate logistical regression models were used to analyse the independent effect of obesity, with body-mass-index (BMI) dichotomised at 30 kg/m (model-1) and at 90 percentile (model-2), on PSMs.

RESULTS

Median BMI was 27.2 kg/m, PSMs were found in 15.5% (n = 36). In multivariate model-1, obesity did not have a significant effect on PSMs (OR 2.34, p = 0.061). However, if BMI was dichotomized at the 90 percentile (BMI ≥33.7 kg/m²), patients with a higher BMI showed PSMs four-times more frequently (OR 3.99, p = 0.013). In both models, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and pathological tumour stage had a significant effect on PSMs. There was no significant correlation between BMI and the extent of PSMs, nor a significant difference between the BMI groups and the localisation of PSMs. There was a higher percentage of posteriolateral PSM localisation in obese patients compared to patients with a BMI of less than 30 kg/m (58.3% and 25.3% of the localisations were posterolateral in obese and non-obese patients, respectively), however this effect was not statistically significant (p = 0.175).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to a longer operation time and about twice as many complications, patients with a BMI of ≥33.7 kg/m² had a higher PSM rate after RARP. Differences in localization of PSMs in relation to obesity should be evaluated in future research.

摘要

引言

目前关于体重指数(BMI)对局限性前列腺癌患者机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后手术切缘阳性(PSM)影响的研究结果并不一致。因此,本研究的目的是进一步分析RARP术后BMI与PSM之间的关联。

材料与方法

2017年3月至2017年12月,对232例RARP患者进行了一项多中心、前瞻性、随机、单盲系列研究,并对结果进行了盲法评估。采用多变量逻辑回归模型分析肥胖的独立影响,将体重指数(BMI)分为30kg/m²(模型1)和第90百分位数(模型2),分析其对PSM的影响。

结果

BMI中位数为27.2kg/m²,发现36例(15.5%)患者出现PSM。在多变量模型1中,肥胖对PSM没有显著影响(OR 2.34,p = 0.061)。然而,如果将BMI分为第90百分位数(BMI≥33.7kg/m²),BMI较高的患者出现PSM的频率高出四倍(OR 3.99,p = 0.013)。在两个模型中,术前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平和病理肿瘤分期对PSM有显著影响。BMI与PSM范围之间无显著相关性,BMI组与PSM定位之间也无显著差异。与BMI小于30kg/m²的患者相比,肥胖患者后外侧PSM定位的百分比更高(肥胖和非肥胖患者的定位分别有58.3%和25.3%为后外侧),然而这种影响在统计学上并不显著(p = 0.175)。

结论

除了手术时间延长和并发症多出约一倍外,BMI≥33.7kg/m²的患者在RARP术后PSM发生率更高。未来的研究应评估肥胖与PSM定位差异之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Obesity leads to a higher rate of positive surgical margins in the context of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Results of a prospective multicenter study.肥胖在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的情况下会导致更高的手术切缘阳性率。一项前瞻性多中心研究的结果。
Cent European J Urol. 2020;73(4):457-465. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2020.0265.R1. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
2
Exploring positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Does body habitus really make a difference ?探索微创根治性前列腺切除术后的切缘阳性:体型真的有影响吗?
Prog Urol. 2018 Jun;28(8-9):434-441. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 May 20.
3
Surgeon volume and body mass index influence positive surgical margin risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Results in 732 cases.外科医生手术量和体重指数对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性风险的影响:732例病例结果
Arab J Urol. 2019 May 30;17(3):234-242. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1619276. eCollection 2019.
4
Evaluation of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy according to preoperative risk groups.根据术前风险分组评估接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和开放性根治性前列腺切除术患者的手术切缘阳性情况。
Urol Oncol. 2016 Feb;34(2):57.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.08.019. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
5
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
6
Impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after robotic prostatectomy on biochemical recurrence (BCR): Multicenter analysis.机器人辅助前列腺切除术后切缘阳性对生化复发的影响:多中心分析
Urologia. 2023 Nov;90(4):647-652. doi: 10.1177/03915603231183478. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
7
The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后,至少随访 5 年,阳性切缘的长度和位置对预测生化复发的影响。
BJU Int. 2015 Jan;115(1):106-13. doi: 10.1111/bju.12483.
8
A Novel Approach for Apical Dissection During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: The "Collar" Technique.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时尖部解剖的新方法:“颈圈”技术。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Sep;4(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 May 7.
9
Matched comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy regarding pathologic and oncologic outcomes in obese patients.肥胖患者机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放性根治性前列腺切除术的病理及肿瘤学结果匹配比较。
World J Urol. 2015 Mar;33(3):397-402. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1326-1. Epub 2014 May 23.
10
Tumour location determined by preoperative MRI is an independent predictor for positive surgical margin status after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.术前 MRI 确定的肿瘤位置是保留耻骨后间隙机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性状态的独立预测因子。
BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):152-158. doi: 10.1111/bju.15060. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Oncologic and perioperative outcomes following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in morbidly obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肥胖患者机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的肿瘤学和围手术期结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 31;19(1):537. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02641-6.
2
Impact of Class III Obesity (Morbid Obesity) on the Perioperative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.III 级肥胖(病态肥胖)对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术围手术期、功能及肿瘤学结局的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 19;17(4):709. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040709.
3
The Impact of Diabetes and Antidiabetics on Uro-Oncological Disease Outcomes: A Single-Center Experience.糖尿病及抗糖尿病药物对泌尿肿瘤疾病结局的影响:单中心经验
Urol Int. 2025 Jan 24:1-11. doi: 10.1159/000543757.
4
Impact of Obesity on Perioperative and Clinical Outcomes After Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.肥胖对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后围手术期及临床结局的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82003-8.
5
Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes in obese patients undergoing Da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.达芬奇机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗肥胖患者的围手术期、功能和肿瘤学结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2024 Sep 23;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01595-5.
6
BMI Impact on Readmissions for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Monocentric, Single-Surgeon Serial Analysis of 500 Cases.体重指数对接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者再入院率的影响:一项针对500例病例的单中心、单外科医生的系列分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 7;12(12):3908. doi: 10.3390/jcm12123908.
7
Effect of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy on the Postoperative Course for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.新辅助激素治疗对接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者术后病程的影响。
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 22;12(9):3053. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093053.
8
High BMI and Surgical Time Are Significant Predictors of Lymphocele after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.高体重指数和手术时间是机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后淋巴囊肿的重要预测因素。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 4;15(9):2611. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092611.
9
Prospective comparative trial on nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy using a robot-assisted versus laparoscopic technique: expectation versus satisfaction and impact on surgical margins.机器人辅助与腹腔镜技术行保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术的前瞻性对比试验:期望与满意度及对手术切缘的影响
Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(2):169-177. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0017.R3. Epub 2021 May 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Peritoneal Flap in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的腹膜瓣
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Apr 3;117(14):243-250. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0243.
2
Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.在高容量中心,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘阳性的线性范围对生化复发有影响。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):663-675. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01039-5. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
3
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs. open radical prostatectomy: latest evidences on perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术:围手术期、功能和肿瘤学结果的最新证据。
Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Jan;30(1):73-78. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000688.
4
Risk factors of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-volume center: results in 732 cases.高容量中心机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的危险因素:732 例结果。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Feb;14(1):167-175. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00954-x. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
5
Exploring positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Does body habitus really make a difference ?探索微创根治性前列腺切除术后的切缘阳性:体型真的有影响吗?
Prog Urol. 2018 Jun;28(8-9):434-441. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 May 20.
6
The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging.第八版 AJCC 癌症分期手册:继续从基于人群的方法向更“个体化”的癌症分期方法构建桥梁。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):93-99. doi: 10.3322/caac.21388. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
7
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌Gleason分级共识会议:分级模式的定义及新分级系统的建议
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.
8
[Influence of body mass index on histopathological and intraoperative criteria in a consecutive series of patients after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy].[体重指数对连续系列机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后患者组织病理学及术中标准的影响]
Aktuelle Urol. 2014 Nov;45(6):464-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1394427. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
9
Obesity and cancer pathogenesis.肥胖与癌症发病机制。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Apr;1311:57-76. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12416.
10
Obesity, energy balance, and cancer: a mechanistic perspective.肥胖、能量平衡与癌症:一种机制性观点。
Cancer Treat Res. 2014;159:21-33. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-38007-5_2.