• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

能力验证。其在自愿性临床实验室认可计划中的作用。

Proficiency testing. Its role in a voluntary clinical Laboratory Accreditation Program.

作者信息

Duckworth J K

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Methodist Hospitals of Memphis.

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):346-8.

PMID:3355330
Abstract

The author's long experience as Chairman of the Laboratory Accreditation Program of the College of American Pathologists provides the background for this article. Laboratory accreditation and proficiency testing have now become an established part of the clinical laboratories in the United States. This article attempts to demonstrate the relationship between proficiency testing and accreditation, and highlights some of the current problems and future challenges facing proficiency testing as pertains to accreditation.

摘要

作者作为美国病理学家学会实验室认可计划主席的长期经验为本文提供了背景。实验室认可和能力验证现已成为美国临床实验室既定的一部分。本文试图阐述能力验证与认可之间的关系,并着重介绍与认可相关的能力验证目前面临的一些问题和未来挑战。

相似文献

1
Proficiency testing. Its role in a voluntary clinical Laboratory Accreditation Program.能力验证。其在自愿性临床实验室认可计划中的作用。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):346-8.
2
College of American Pathologists Conference XIII on the evaluation of proficiency testing results for quantitative methods in relation to clinical usefulness: concluding remarks.美国病理学家学会关于定量方法能力验证结果与临床实用性评估的第十三次会议:总结发言。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):471-2.
3
Overview of the laboratory accreditation programme of the College of American Pathologists.美国病理学家学会实验室认可计划概述。
East Mediterr Health J. 2002 Jul-Sep;8(4-5):654-63.
4
Multiprogram characterization of laboratory bias, precision, and total error. Proposal for improved assessment with shared external and expanded internal (regional) quality control pools.实验室偏倚、精密度和总误差的多程序特征描述。关于利用共享外部和扩展内部(区域)质量控制样本池改进评估的建议。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):454-61.
5
The overall role of a proficiency testing program.能力验证计划的整体作用。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):340-2.
6
Survey of special practices associated with College of American Pathologists proficiency testing in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.宾夕法尼亚州美国病理学家学会能力验证相关特殊实践调查。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):374-6.
7
Review of proficiency testing performance of laboratories accredited by the College of American Pathologists.美国病理学家学会认可实验室的能力验证表现回顾
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1987 Nov;111(11):1011-4.
8
The College of American Pathologists Laboratory Accreditation Programme.美国病理学家学会实验室认可计划
Clin Lab Haematol. 1990;12 Suppl 1:135-8.
9
The application of theoretical goals based on biological variation data in proficiency testing.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):404-15.
10
The importance of an effective proficiency testing program to the regulation of clinical laboratories. The view from one state.有效能力验证计划对临床实验室监管的重要性。来自一个州的观点。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):368-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving approaches to management of quality in clinical microbiology.临床微生物学质量控制的不断发展的管理方法。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994 Jan;7(1):55-88. doi: 10.1128/CMR.7.1.55.