Pradenas Edwards, Trinité Benjamin, Urrea Víctor, Marfil Silvia, Ávila-Nieto Carlos, Rodríguez de la Concepción María Luisa, Tarrés-Freixas Ferran, Pérez-Yanes Silvia, Rovirosa Carla, Ainsua-Enrich Erola, Rodon Jordi, Vergara-Alert Júlia, Segalés Joaquim, Guallar Victor, Valencia Alfonso, Izquierdo-Useros Nuria, Paredes Roger, Mateu Lourdes, Chamorro Anna, Massanella Marta, Carrillo Jorge, Clotet Bonaventura, Blanco Julià
IrsiCaixa AIDS Research Institute, Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Can Ruti Campus, UAB, 08916 Badalona, Catalonia, Spain.
Laboratorio de Inmunología Celular y Viral, Unidad de Farmacología, Sección de Medicina, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), La Laguna 38071, Tenerife, Spain.
Med. 2021 Mar 12;2(3):313-320.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
Understanding mid-term kinetics of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is the cornerstone for public health control of the pandemic and vaccine development. However, current evidence is rather based on limited measurements, losing sight of the temporal pattern of these changes.
We conducted a longitudinal analysis on a prospective cohort of COVID-19 patients followed up for >6 months. Neutralizing activity was evaluated using HIV reporter pseudoviruses expressing SARS-CoV-2 S protein. IgG antibody titer was evaluated by ELISA against the S2 subunit, the receptor binding domain (RBD), and the nucleoprotein (NP). Statistical analyses were carried out using mixed-effects models.
We found that individuals with mild or asymptomatic infection experienced an insignificant decay in neutralizing activity, which persisted 6 months after symptom onset or diagnosis. Hospitalized individuals showed higher neutralizing titers, which decreased following a 2-phase pattern, with an initial rapid decline that significantly slowed after day 80. Despite this initial decay, neutralizing activity at 6 months remained higher among hospitalized individuals compared to mild symptomatic. The slow decline in neutralizing activity at mid-term contrasted with the steep slope of anti-RBD, S2, or NP antibody titers, all of them showing a constant decline over the follow-up period.
Our results reinforce the hypothesis that the quality of the neutralizing immune response against SARS-CoV-2 evolves over the post-convalescent stage.
了解对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)免疫的中期动力学是该大流行疾病公共卫生控制和疫苗开发的基石。然而,目前的证据相当基于有限的测量,忽视了这些变化的时间模式。
我们对随访超过6个月的COVID-19患者前瞻性队列进行了纵向分析。使用表达SARS-CoV-2 S蛋白的HIV报告基因假病毒评估中和活性。通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)针对S2亚基、受体结合域(RBD)和核蛋白(NP)评估IgG抗体滴度。使用混合效应模型进行统计分析。
我们发现,轻度或无症状感染的个体中和活性下降不显著,在症状出现或诊断后6个月仍持续存在。住院患者显示出更高的中和滴度,其下降呈两阶段模式,最初快速下降,在第80天后显著减缓。尽管有这种初始下降,但与轻度症状患者相比,住院患者6个月时的中和活性仍然更高。中期中和活性的缓慢下降与抗RBD、S2或NP抗体滴度的陡峭斜率形成对比,所有这些抗体滴度在随访期间均呈持续下降。
我们的结果强化了这样一种假设,即针对SARS-CoV-2的中和免疫反应质量在恢复期后会发生变化。