• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罗氏 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的临床评估。

Clinical assessment of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test.

机构信息

Service of Laboratory Medicine, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.

Section of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 Jan 18;8(3):322-326. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0154. Print 2021 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1515/dx-2020-0154
PMID:33554511
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Novel point-of-care antigen assays present a promising opportunity for rapid screening of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. The purpose of this study was the clinical assessment of the new Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test.

METHODS

The clinical performance of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test was evaluated vs. a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) laboratory-based assay (Seegene AllplexTM2019-nCoV) in nasopharyngeal swabs collected from a series of consecutive patients referred for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics to the Pederzoli Hospital (Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy) over a 2-week period.

RESULTS

The final study population consisted of 321 consecutive patients (mean age, 46 years and IQR, 32-56 years; 181 women, 56.4%), with 149/321 (46.4%) positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA via the Seegene AllplexTM2019-nCoV Assay, and 109/321 (34.0%) positive with Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test, respectively. The overall accuracy of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test compared to molecular testing was 86.9%, with 72.5% sensitivity and 99.4% specificity. Progressive decline in performance was observed as cycle threshold (Ct) values of different SARS-CoV-2 gene targets increased. The sensitivity was found to range between 97-100% in clinical samples with Ct values <25, between 50-81% in those with Ct values between 25 and <30, but low as 12-18% in samples with Ct values between 30 and <37.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical performance of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test is excellent in nasopharyngeal swabs with Ct values <25, which makes it a reliable screening test in patients with high viral load. However, mass community screening would require the use of more sensitive techniques.

摘要

目的

新型即时抗原检测为快速筛查严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)感染提供了一个有希望的机会。本研究旨在评估罗氏 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的临床性能。

方法

在为期两周的时间内,对来自意大利维罗纳佩德佐利医院(Pederzoli Hospital)因 SARS-CoV-2 诊断而就诊的一系列连续患者的鼻咽拭子,使用罗氏 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测与基于逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)的实验室检测(Seegene AllplexTM2019-nCoV)进行了临床性能评估。

结果

最终研究人群由 321 例连续患者组成(平均年龄为 46 岁,IQR 为 32-56 岁;女性 181 例,占 56.4%),其中 149/321(46.4%)通过 Seegene AllplexTM2019-nCoV 检测呈 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 阳性,109/321(34.0%)通过罗氏 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测呈阳性。与分子检测相比,罗氏 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的总体准确率为 86.9%,灵敏度为 72.5%,特异性为 99.4%。随着不同 SARS-CoV-2 基因靶标循环阈值(Ct)值的增加,检测性能逐渐下降。在 Ct 值<25 的临床样本中,检测的灵敏度范围在 97-100%之间,在 Ct 值为 25-<30 的样本中为 50-81%,但在 Ct 值为 30-<37 的样本中灵敏度较低,为 12-18%。

结论

罗氏 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测在 Ct 值<25 的鼻咽拭子中具有出色的临床性能,使其成为高病毒载量患者可靠的筛查检测方法。然而,大规模社区筛查将需要使用更敏感的技术。

相似文献

1
Clinical assessment of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test.罗氏 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的临床评估。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 Jan 18;8(3):322-326. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0154. Print 2021 Aug 26.
2
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原和基于分子的检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3(3):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub2.
3
Diagnostic performance of the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in the clinical routine of a tertiary care hospital: Preliminary results from a single-center evaluation.Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测在三级医院临床常规中的诊断性能:一项单中心评估的初步结果。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Aug;35(8):e23906. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23906. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
4
Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in comparison with real-time RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Thailand.泰国用于 COVID-19 实验室诊断的快速 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测与实时 RT-PCR 检测的比较。
Virol J. 2020 Nov 13;17(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12985-020-01452-5.
5
Sensitivity and Specificity of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection Tests Using Oral, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swabs: a Diagnostic Accuracy Study.使用口腔、前鼻和鼻咽拭子的 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测试验的敏感性和特异性:一项诊断准确性研究。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0202921. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02029-21. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
6
Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection potentiates early diagnosis of COVID-19 disease.快速 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测有助于 COVID-19 疾病的早期诊断。
Biosci Trends. 2021 May 11;15(2):93-99. doi: 10.5582/bst.2021.01090. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
7
A Generic, Scalable, and Rapid Time-Resolved Förster Resonance Energy Transfer-Based Assay for Antigen Detection-SARS-CoV-2 as a Proof of Concept.一种通用、可扩展且快速的基于时间分辨Förster 共振能量转移的抗原检测方法 - 以 SARS-CoV-2 作为概念验证。
mBio. 2021 May 18;12(3):e00902-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00902-21.
8
Evaluation of Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay automated test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) in nasopharyngeal swabs for community and population screening.Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2抗原检测法用于社区和人群筛查中检测鼻咽拭子中SARS-CoV-2核衣壳蛋白(NP)的自动化检测评估。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:391-396. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.098. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
9
On-field evaluation of a ultra-rapid fluorescence immunoassay as a frontline test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic.现场评估一种超快速荧光免疫分析作为 SARS-CoV-2 诊断的一线检测方法。
J Virol Methods. 2021 Sep;295:114201. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114201. Epub 2021 May 28.
10
Comparative evaluation of RT-PCR and antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) for SARS-CoV-2 detection: performance, variant specificity, and clinical implications.实时荧光 RT-PCR 与抗原检测试剂用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的比较评估:性能、变异株特异性和临床意义。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0007324. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00073-24. Epub 2024 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19 compared to the viral genetic test in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较 COVID-19 快速抗原检测与成人病毒基因检测的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Oct 1;22(10):1939-2002. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00291.
2
Rolosense: Mechanical Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Using a DNA-Based Motor.罗氏传感:基于DNA的马达对新冠病毒的机械检测
ACS Cent Sci. 2024 May 21;10(7):1332-1347. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.4c00312. eCollection 2024 Jul 24.
3
Development of a lateral flow immunoassays-based method for the screening of ractopamine in foods and evaluation of the optimal strategy in combination of screening and confirmatory tests.
建立一种基于侧向流免疫分析的方法用于检测食品中的莱克多巴胺,并评估筛选与确证试验相结合的最佳策略。
J Food Drug Anal. 2023 Jun 15;31(2):289-301. doi: 10.38212/2224-6614.3458.
4
Association between viral load and positivization time of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test in routine nasopharyngeal specimens.常规鼻咽标本中SARS-CoV-2快速抗原检测的病毒载量与阳性化时间之间的关联。
J Med Biochem. 2022 Oct 15;41(4):513-517. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-35482.
5
Resumption of professional football league with spectators during the COVID-19 pandemic: The implementation of Bio-secure bubble protocol.在新冠疫情期间恢复有观众的职业足球联赛:生物安全气泡协议的实施
Qatar Med J. 2022 Jul 26;2022(3):31. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2022.31. eCollection 2022.
6
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
7
Performance of Antigen Detection Tests for SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新型冠状病毒抗原检测试验的性能:系统评价与荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 4;12(6):1388. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061388.
8
Diagnostic Performance of Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests, Chest Computed Tomography, and Lung Point-of-Care-Ultrasonography for SARS-CoV-2 Compared with RT-PCR Testing: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.与逆转录聚合酶链反应检测相比,抗原快速诊断检测、胸部计算机断层扫描和肺部即时超声对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的诊断性能:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 24;12(6):1302. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061302.
9
Recommencement of football competition with spectators during the active phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in a Middle Eastern country.在中东国家新冠疫情活跃期恢复有观众在场的足球比赛。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun 20;14(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00504-3.
10
Accuracy of rapid point-of-care antigen-based diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression analyzing influencing factors.基于快速床边抗原检测的 SARS-CoV-2 准确性:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析,以及荟萃回归分析影响因素。
PLoS Med. 2022 May 26;19(5):e1004011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004011. eCollection 2022 May.