文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Evaluation of Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay automated test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) in nasopharyngeal swabs for community and population screening.

作者信息

Gili Alessio, Paggi Riccardo, Russo Carla, Cenci Elio, Pietrella Donatella, Graziani Alessandro, Stracci Fabrizio, Mencacci Antonella

机构信息

Public Health Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:391-396. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.098. Epub 2021 Feb 26.


DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.098
PMID:33647511
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7908845/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the Lumipulse® SARS-CoV-2 antigen test with the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and to evaluate its role in screening programs. METHODS: Lumipulse® SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay was compared with the gold standard RT-PCR test in a selected cohort of 226 subjects with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, and its accuracy was evaluated. Subsequently, the test was administered to a real-life screening cohort of 1738 cases. ROC analysis was performed to explore test features and cutoffs. All tests were performed in the regional reference laboratory in Umbria, Italy. RESULTS: A 42.0% positive result at RT-PCR was observed in the selected cohort. The Lumipulse® system showed 92.6% sensitivity (95% CI 85.4-97.0%) and 90.8% specificity (95% CI 84.5-95.2%) at 1.24 pg/mL optimal cutoff. In the screening cohort, characterized by 5.2% prevalence of infection, Lumipulse® assay showed 100% sensitivity (95% CI 96.0-100.0%) and 94.8% specificity (95% CI 93.6-95.8%) at 1.645 pg/mL optimal cutoff; the AUC was 97.4%, NPV was 100% (95% CI 99.8-100.0%) and PPV was 51.1% (95% CI 43.5-58.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The Lumipulse® SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay can be safely employed in the screening strategies in small and large communities and in the general population.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70cc/7908845/0198217014ae/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70cc/7908845/71883f523532/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70cc/7908845/0198217014ae/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70cc/7908845/71883f523532/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70cc/7908845/0198217014ae/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Evaluation of Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay automated test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) in nasopharyngeal swabs for community and population screening.

Int J Infect Dis. 2021-4

[2]
Accuracy of a nucleocapsid protein antigen rapid test in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021-2

[3]
A Generic, Scalable, and Rapid Time-Resolved Förster Resonance Energy Transfer-Based Assay for Antigen Detection-SARS-CoV-2 as a Proof of Concept.

mBio. 2021-5-18

[4]
Prospective study of 1308 nasopharyngeal swabs from 1033 patients using the LUMIPULSE SARS-CoV-2 antigen test: Comparison with RT-qPCR.

Int J Infect Dis. 2021-4

[5]
Evaluation of a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay for the diagnosis of COVID-19: The VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test.

J Med Virol. 2021-12

[6]
Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen in oropharyngeal swabs using single molecule array technology.

Sci Rep. 2021-10-13

[7]
On-field evaluation of a ultra-rapid fluorescence immunoassay as a frontline test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic.

J Virol Methods. 2021-9

[8]
Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in comparison with real-time RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Thailand.

Virol J. 2020-11-13

[9]
Diagnostic performance of the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in the clinical routine of a tertiary care hospital: Preliminary results from a single-center evaluation.

J Clin Lab Anal. 2021-8

[10]
Clinical assessment of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test.

Diagnosis (Berl). 2021-8-26

引用本文的文献

[1]
Clinical accuracy of instrument-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen diagnostic tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Virol J. 2024-4-29

[2]
Association Between Rapid Antigen Detection Tests and Real-Time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Int J Public Health. 2023

[3]
Improvement of Sensitivity and Speed of Virus Sensing Technologies Using nm- and μm-Scale Components.

Sensors (Basel). 2023-7-31

[4]
Automated antigen assays display a high heterogeneity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including several Omicron sublineages.

Med Microbiol Immunol. 2023-10

[5]
Evolution of the newest diagnostic methods for COVID-19: a Chinese perspective.

J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2023-6-15

[6]
Diagnostic value and characteristic analysis of serum nucleocapsid antigen in COVID-19 patients.

PeerJ. 2023

[7]
The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Antigen Testing (January 2023).

Clin Infect Dis. 2024-6-27

[8]
Temperature-Responsive Liposome-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Using Immunoliposomes.

ACS Omega. 2022-7-21

[9]
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-22

[10]
The Detection of SARS-CoV2 Antigen in Wastewater Using an Automated Chemiluminescence Enzyme Immunoassay.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-6-24

本文引用的文献

[1]
Mass testing for COVID-19.

Lancet Microbe. 2020-12

[2]
Updated rapid risk assessment from ECDC on the risk related to the spread of new SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in the EU/EEA - first update.

Euro Surveill. 2021-1

[3]
Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China.

Nat Commun. 2020-11-20

[4]
Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 screening.

Sci Adv. 2021-1

[5]
Analysis of a persistent viral shedding patient infected with SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR, FilmArray Respiratory Panel v2.1, and antigen detection.

J Infect Chemother. 2021-2

[6]
Covid-19: Mass population testing is rolled out in Liverpool.

BMJ. 2020-11-3

[7]
Rethinking Covid-19 Test Sensitivity - A Strategy for Containment.

N Engl J Med. 2020-11-26

[8]
Comparison of automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen test for COVID-19 infection with quantitative RT-PCR using 313 nasopharyngeal swabs, including from seven serially followed patients.

Int J Infect Dis. 2020-8-12

[9]
Duration of infectiousness and correlation with RT-PCR cycle threshold values in cases of COVID-19, England, January to May 2020.

Euro Surveill. 2020-8

[10]
Can the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Polymerase Chain Reaction Cycle Threshold Value and Time From Symptom Onset to Testing Predict Infectivity?

Clin Infect Dis. 2020-12-17

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索