• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2抗原检测法用于社区和人群筛查中检测鼻咽拭子中SARS-CoV-2核衣壳蛋白(NP)的自动化检测评估。

Evaluation of Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay automated test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) in nasopharyngeal swabs for community and population screening.

作者信息

Gili Alessio, Paggi Riccardo, Russo Carla, Cenci Elio, Pietrella Donatella, Graziani Alessandro, Stracci Fabrizio, Mencacci Antonella

机构信息

Public Health Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:391-396. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.098. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.098
PMID:33647511
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7908845/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the Lumipulse® SARS-CoV-2 antigen test with the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and to evaluate its role in screening programs.

METHODS

Lumipulse® SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay was compared with the gold standard RT-PCR test in a selected cohort of 226 subjects with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, and its accuracy was evaluated. Subsequently, the test was administered to a real-life screening cohort of 1738 cases. ROC analysis was performed to explore test features and cutoffs. All tests were performed in the regional reference laboratory in Umbria, Italy.

RESULTS

A 42.0% positive result at RT-PCR was observed in the selected cohort. The Lumipulse® system showed 92.6% sensitivity (95% CI 85.4-97.0%) and 90.8% specificity (95% CI 84.5-95.2%) at 1.24 pg/mL optimal cutoff. In the screening cohort, characterized by 5.2% prevalence of infection, Lumipulse® assay showed 100% sensitivity (95% CI 96.0-100.0%) and 94.8% specificity (95% CI 93.6-95.8%) at 1.645 pg/mL optimal cutoff; the AUC was 97.4%, NPV was 100% (95% CI 99.8-100.0%) and PPV was 51.1% (95% CI 43.5-58.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The Lumipulse® SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay can be safely employed in the screening strategies in small and large communities and in the general population.

摘要

目的

比较Lumipulse® SARS-CoV-2抗原检测与诊断SARS-CoV-2感染的金标准实时逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR),并评估其在筛查项目中的作用。

方法

在226例疑似SARS-CoV-2感染的选定队列中,将Lumipulse® SARS-CoV-2抗原检测与金标准RT-PCR检测进行比较,并评估其准确性。随后,对1738例病例的实际筛查队列进行该检测。进行ROC分析以探索检测特征和临界值。所有检测均在意大利翁布里亚的地区参考实验室进行。

结果

在选定队列中观察到RT-PCR阳性结果为42.0%。Lumipulse®系统在最佳临界值为1.24 pg/mL时,敏感性为92.6%(95%CI 85.4-97.0%),特异性为90.8%(95%CI 84.5-95.2%)。在感染率为5.2%的筛查队列中,Lumipulse®检测在最佳临界值为1.645 pg/mL时,敏感性为100%(95%CI 96.0-100.0%),特异性为94.8%(95%CI 93.6-95.8%);曲线下面积为97.4%,阴性预测值为100%(95%CI 99.8-100.0%),阳性预测值为51.1%(95%CI 43.5-58.7%)。

结论

Lumipulse® SARS-CoV-2抗原检测可安全用于大小社区及普通人群的筛查策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70cc/7908845/0198217014ae/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70cc/7908845/71883f523532/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70cc/7908845/0198217014ae/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70cc/7908845/71883f523532/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70cc/7908845/0198217014ae/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay automated test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) in nasopharyngeal swabs for community and population screening.Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2抗原检测法用于社区和人群筛查中检测鼻咽拭子中SARS-CoV-2核衣壳蛋白(NP)的自动化检测评估。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:391-396. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.098. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
2
Accuracy of a nucleocapsid protein antigen rapid test in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.核衣壳蛋白抗原快速检测在 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断中的准确性。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Feb;27(2):289.e1-289.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.057. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
3
A Generic, Scalable, and Rapid Time-Resolved Förster Resonance Energy Transfer-Based Assay for Antigen Detection-SARS-CoV-2 as a Proof of Concept.一种通用、可扩展且快速的基于时间分辨Förster 共振能量转移的抗原检测方法 - 以 SARS-CoV-2 作为概念验证。
mBio. 2021 May 18;12(3):e00902-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00902-21.
4
Prospective study of 1308 nasopharyngeal swabs from 1033 patients using the LUMIPULSE SARS-CoV-2 antigen test: Comparison with RT-qPCR.1033 例患者 1308 份鼻咽拭子的前瞻性研究:LUMIPULSE SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测与 RT-qPCR 的比较。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
5
Evaluation of a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay for the diagnosis of COVID-19: The VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test.基于化学发光酶免疫分析的高通量 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒用于 COVID-19 诊断的评估:VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒。
J Med Virol. 2021 Dec;93(12):6778-6781. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27153. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
6
Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen in oropharyngeal swabs using single molecule array technology.利用单分子阵列技术定量检测口咽拭子中的 SARS-CoV-2 核衣壳抗原。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 13;11(1):20323. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99807-7.
7
On-field evaluation of a ultra-rapid fluorescence immunoassay as a frontline test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic.现场评估一种超快速荧光免疫分析作为 SARS-CoV-2 诊断的一线检测方法。
J Virol Methods. 2021 Sep;295:114201. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114201. Epub 2021 May 28.
8
Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in comparison with real-time RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Thailand.泰国用于 COVID-19 实验室诊断的快速 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测与实时 RT-PCR 检测的比较。
Virol J. 2020 Nov 13;17(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12985-020-01452-5.
9
Diagnostic performance of the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in the clinical routine of a tertiary care hospital: Preliminary results from a single-center evaluation.Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测在三级医院临床常规中的诊断性能:一项单中心评估的初步结果。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Aug;35(8):e23906. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23906. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
10
Clinical assessment of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test.罗氏 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的临床评估。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 Jan 18;8(3):322-326. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0154. Print 2021 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical accuracy of instrument-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen diagnostic tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于仪器的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原诊断检测的临床准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Virol J. 2024 Apr 29;21(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02371-5.
2
Association Between Rapid Antigen Detection Tests and Real-Time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.快速抗原检测试验与实时逆转录-聚合酶链反应检测 SARS-CoV-2 的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Public Health. 2023 Aug 1;68:1605452. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605452. eCollection 2023.
3
Improvement of Sensitivity and Speed of Virus Sensing Technologies Using nm- and μm-Scale Components.

本文引用的文献

1
Mass testing for COVID-19.新冠病毒大规模检测。
Lancet Microbe. 2020 Dec;1(8):e317. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30205-6. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
2
Updated rapid risk assessment from ECDC on the risk related to the spread of new SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in the EU/EEA - first update.欧洲疾病预防控制中心(ECDC)关于欧盟/欧洲经济区(EEA)新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)变异毒株传播相关风险的最新快速风险评估——首次更新。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Jan;26(3). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.3.2101211.
3
Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China.
利用纳米和微米级组件提高病毒感测技术的灵敏度和速度。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;23(15):6830. doi: 10.3390/s23156830.
4
Automated antigen assays display a high heterogeneity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including several Omicron sublineages.自动化抗原检测在检测 SARS-CoV-2 关注变体方面表现出高度的异质性,包括几种奥密克戎亚谱系。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2023 Oct;212(5):307-322. doi: 10.1007/s00430-023-00774-9. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
5
Evolution of the newest diagnostic methods for COVID-19: a Chinese perspective.新冠病毒最新诊断方法的演变:中国视角。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2023 Jun 15;24(6):463-484. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2200625.
6
Diagnostic value and characteristic analysis of serum nucleocapsid antigen in COVID-19 patients.血清核衣壳抗原在 COVID-19 患者中的诊断价值及特征分析。
PeerJ. 2023 Jun 7;11:e15515. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15515. eCollection 2023.
7
The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Antigen Testing (January 2023).美国传染病学会关于 COVID-19 诊断的指南:抗原检测(2023 年 1 月)。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 27;78(7):e350-e384. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad032.
8
Temperature-Responsive Liposome-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Using Immunoliposomes.用于使用免疫脂质体快速检测新型冠状病毒的温度响应脂质体连接免疫吸附测定法。
ACS Omega. 2022 Jul 21;7(30):26936-26944. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03597. eCollection 2022 Aug 2.
9
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
10
The Detection of SARS-CoV2 Antigen in Wastewater Using an Automated Chemiluminescence Enzyme Immunoassay.利用自动化化学发光酶免疫分析检测污水中的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 24;19(13):7783. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137783.
中国武汉近千万居民封控后新冠病毒核酸筛查。
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 20;11(1):5917. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19802-w.
4
Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 screening.新冠病毒筛查时,检测敏感性次于检测频率和周转时间。
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 1;7(1). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd5393. Print 2021 Jan.
5
Analysis of a persistent viral shedding patient infected with SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR, FilmArray Respiratory Panel v2.1, and antigen detection.采用 RT-qPCR、FilmArray 呼吸道Panel v2.1 和抗原检测对持续性病毒脱落感染 SARS-CoV-2 的患者进行分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Feb;27(2):406-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.10.026. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
6
Covid-19: Mass population testing is rolled out in Liverpool.新冠疫情:利物浦开始进行大规模人群检测。
BMJ. 2020 Nov 3;371:m4268. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4268.
7
Rethinking Covid-19 Test Sensitivity - A Strategy for Containment.重新思考新冠病毒检测敏感性——一种遏制策略。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 26;383(22):e120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2025631. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
8
Comparison of automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen test for COVID-19 infection with quantitative RT-PCR using 313 nasopharyngeal swabs, including from seven serially followed patients.比较 313 例鼻咽拭子(包括 7 例连续随访患者)的自动化 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测与定量 RT-PCR 对 COVID-19 感染的检测结果。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;99:397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.029. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
9
Duration of infectiousness and correlation with RT-PCR cycle threshold values in cases of COVID-19, England, January to May 2020.2020 年 1 月至 5 月期间,英国 COVID-19 病例的传染性持续时间及其与 RT-PCR 循环阈值的相关性。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Aug;25(32). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.32.2001483.
10
Can the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Polymerase Chain Reaction Cycle Threshold Value and Time From Symptom Onset to Testing Predict Infectivity?严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型聚合酶链反应循环阈值以及从症状出现到检测的时间能否预测传染性?
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):2667-2668. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa735.