Suppr超能文献

新冠病毒出版物中对发热的定义:令人不安的不精确性。

How fever is defined in COVID-19 publications: a disturbing lack of precision.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 2020 Dec 24;49(3):255-261. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0546. Print 2021 Mar 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Fever is the single most frequently reported manifestation of COVID-19 and is a critical element of screening persons for COVID-19. The meaning of "fever" varies depending on the cutoff temperature used, the type of thermometer, the time of the day, the site of measurements, and the person's gender and race. The absence of a universally accepted definition for fever has been especially problematic during the current COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

This investigation determined the extent to which fever is defined in COVID-19 publications, with special attention to those associated with pregnancy.

RESULTS

Of 53 publications identified in which "fever" is reported as a manifestation of COVID-19 illness, none described the method used to measure patient's temperatures. Only 10 (19%) publications specified the minimum temperature used to define a fever with values that varied from a 37.3 °C (99.1 °F) to 38.1 °C (100.6 °F).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a disturbing lack of precision in defining fever in COVID-19 publications. Given the many factors influencing temperature measurements in humans, there can never be a single, universally accepted temperature cut-off defining a fever. This clinical reality should not prevent precision in reporting fever. To achieve the precision and improve scientific and clinical communication, when fever is reported in clinical investigations, at a minimum the cut-off temperature used in determining the presence of fever, the anatomical site at which temperatures are taken, and the instrument used to measure temperatures should each be described. In the absence of such information, what is meant by the term "fever" is uncertain.

摘要

目的

发热是 COVID-19 最常报告的症状之一,也是对 COVID-19 患者进行筛查的关键要素。发热的定义因所采用的临界温度、温度计类型、一天中的时间、测量部位以及患者的性别和种族而异。在当前 COVID-19 大流行期间,缺乏普遍接受的发热定义一直是个特别棘手的问题。

方法

本研究旨在确定 COVID-19 文献中对发热的定义程度,特别关注与妊娠相关的文献。

结果

在所确定的 53 篇报告 COVID-19 疾病发热表现的文献中,没有一篇描述了测量患者体温的方法。只有 10 篇(19%)文献具体说明了用于定义发热的最低温度,值从 37.3°C(99.1°F)到 38.1°C(100.6°F)不等。

结论

在 COVID-19 文献中,对发热的定义存在令人不安的不精确性。鉴于影响人体体温测量的诸多因素,不可能存在一个单一的、普遍接受的临界温度来定义发热。这一临床现实不应妨碍对发热的精确报告。为了实现精确性并改善科学和临床交流,在临床研究中报告发热时,至少应描述用于确定发热存在的临界温度、测量体温的解剖部位以及用于测量体温的仪器。在缺乏这些信息的情况下,术语“发热”的含义是不确定的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验