• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生专业人员、美墨边境的侵犯人权行为与大屠杀的遗留问题

Health Professionals, Human Rights Violations at the US-Mexico Border, and Holocaust Legacy.

机构信息

Director of policy at Physicians for Human Rights.

Senior officer of the Asylum Program at Physicians for Human Rights.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2021 Jan 1;23(1):E38-45. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.38.

DOI:10.1001/amajethics.2021.38
PMID:33554846
Abstract

Health professionals caring for asylum seekers face decisions about whether to participate in force-feeding hunger strikers, performing and reviewing unnecessary x-rays to assess detainees' ages, misusing detainees' health information, and discharging patients based on immigration officials' demands rather than patient safety. The latter action is a classic dual-loyalty dilemma reminiscent of some clinicians' actions during the Holocaust. This article investigates how professional organizations can support clinicians targeted by the state for resisting immigration officials' demands for their participation in human rights violations, opposing policies that compromise health professional values, and refusing to engage in unethical detention practices.

摘要

照顾寻求庇护者的卫生专业人员面临着是否参与强行喂食绝食者、进行和审查不必要的 X 光检查以评估被拘留者年龄、滥用被拘留者健康信息以及根据移民官员的要求而非患者安全来释放患者等决定。后一种行为是一个典型的双重忠诚困境,让人想起大屠杀期间一些临床医生的行为。本文探讨了专业组织如何支持受到国家针对的临床医生,使他们能够抵制移民官员对其参与侵犯人权行为的要求,反对损害卫生专业人员价值观的政策,并拒绝参与不道德的拘留做法。

相似文献

1
Health Professionals, Human Rights Violations at the US-Mexico Border, and Holocaust Legacy.卫生专业人员、美墨边境的侵犯人权行为与大屠杀的遗留问题
AMA J Ethics. 2021 Jan 1;23(1):E38-45. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.38.
2
Assessment of immigration law enforcement presence in a teaching hospital along the US/Mexico border.评估美国/墨西哥边境教学医院的移民执法人员配置情况。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Sep 28;22(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01934-2.
3
Seeking asylum in Australia: immigration detention, human rights and mental health care.在澳大利亚寻求庇护:移民拘留、人权与精神卫生保健
Australas Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;21(4):315-20. doi: 10.1177/1039856213491991. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
4
How Should History of Physician Involvement in the Holocaust Inform How Physicians Approach Employers?医生在大屠杀中的参与史应如何影响医生对待雇主的方式?
AMA J Ethics. 2021 Jan 1;23(1):E12-17. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.12.
5
Helping professionals and Border Force secrecy: effective asylum-seeker healthcare requires independence from callous policies.专业救助人员与边境部队的保密行为:有效的寻求庇护者医疗保健需要独立于冷酷无情的政策之外。
Australas Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;24(1):15-8. doi: 10.1177/1039856215623354. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
6
Policies of deterrence and the mental health of asylum seekers.威慑政策与寻求庇护者的心理健康。
JAMA. 2000 Aug 2;284(5):604-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.5.604.
7
Mental capacity of those in immigration detention in the UK.英国移民拘留中心人员的心理承受能力。
Med Sci Law. 2016 Oct;56(4):285-292. doi: 10.1177/0025802416657263. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
8
Detention and deception: limits of ethical acceptability in detention research.拘留与欺骗:拘留研究中道德可接受性的限度
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2004 Oct;23(4):69-77. doi: 10.1007/BF03351421.
9
Addressing Global Human Rights Violations in Rhode Island: The Brown Human Rights Asylum Clinic.解决罗德岛的全球人权侵犯问题:布朗人权庇护诊所。
R I Med J (2013). 2019 Sep 3;102(7):17-20.
10
Children and young people in immigration detention.移民拘留所中的儿童和青少年。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;25(4):285-92. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283548676.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinicians' perceptions of the health status of formerly detained immigrants.临床医生对被拘留移民健康状况的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;22(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12967-7.