Suppr超能文献

喉癌治疗和结局的差异:基于医院安全网负担的分析。

Disparities in Laryngeal Cancer Treatment and Outcomes: An Analysis by Hospital Safety-Net Burden.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2021 Jun;131(6):E1987-E1997. doi: 10.1002/lary.29416. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To analyze the impact of hospital safety-net burden on survival outcomes for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2015, 59,733 LSCC patients treated with curative intent were identified using the National Cancer Database. Low (LBH) <25th, medium (MBH) 25th-75th, and high (HBH) >75th safety-net burden hospitals were defined by the percentage quartiles (%) of uninsured/Medicaid-insured patients treated. Social and clinicopathologic characteristics and overall survival (using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis) were evaluated. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed using Cox regression modeling.

RESULTS

There were 324, 647, and 323 hospitals that met the criteria as LBH, MBH, and HBH, respectively. The median follow-up was 38.6 months. A total of 27,629 deaths were reported, with a median survival of 75.8 months (a 5-year survival rate of 56.6%). Median survival was 83.2, 77.8, and 69.3 months for patients from LBH, MBH, and HBH, respectively (P < .0001). The median % of uninsured/Medicaid-insured patients treated among LBH, MBH, and HBH were 3.6%, 14.0%, and 27.0%, respectively. Patients treated at HBH were significantly more likely to be young, Black, Hispanic, of low income, and present with more advanced disease compared to LBH and MBH. Survival was comparable for LBH and MBH (HR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.97-1.07, P = .408) on multivariate analysis. HBH, compared to LBH patients, had inferior survival (HR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.01-1.13, P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

High burden safety-net hospitals receive disproportionately more patients with advanced-stage and low socioeconomic status, yielding inferior survival compared to low burden hospitals.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 (individual cohort study) Laryngoscope, 131:E1987-E1997, 2021.

摘要

目的/假设:分析医院安全网负担对喉鳞状细胞癌(LSCC)患者生存结果的影响。

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

方法

使用国家癌症数据库,从 2004 年至 2015 年,确定了 59733 例接受根治性治疗的 LSCC 患者。低(LBH)<第 25 百分位,中(MBH)第 25-75 百分位和高(HBH)>第 75 百分位安全网负担的医院是根据未保险/医疗补助保险患者的百分比(%)四分位数(%)来定义的。评估了社会和临床病理特征以及总生存率(使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析)。使用 Cox 回归模型计算了粗和调整后的风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

分别有 324、647 和 323 家医院符合 LBH、MBH 和 HBH 的标准。中位随访时间为 38.6 个月。共报告了 27629 例死亡,中位生存期为 75.8 个月(5 年生存率为 56.6%)。来自 LBH、MBH 和 HBH 的患者的中位生存时间分别为 83.2、77.8 和 69.3 个月(P<.0001)。LBH、MBH 和 HBH 中治疗的未保险/医疗补助保险患者的中位数分别为 3.6%、14.0%和 27.0%。与 LBH 和 MBH 相比,HBH 治疗的患者更年轻,更可能是黑人,西班牙裔,收入较低,并且病情更晚期。多变量分析显示,LBH 和 MBH 之间的生存情况相似(HR=1.02;95%CI=0.97-1.07,P=0.408)。与 LBH 患者相比,HBH 患者的生存情况较差(HR=1.07;95%CI=1.01-1.13,P=0.023)。

结论

高负担安全网医院收治的晚期和社会经济地位较低的患者不成比例,与低负担医院相比,生存率较差。

证据水平

3(个体队列研究)喉镜,131:E1987-E1997,2021。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验