Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 May;107(5):1472-1479. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.11.065. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
Social determinants of health affect diagnosis and delivery of care to patients with esophageal cancer. This study hypothesized that hospital safety-net burden affects presentation, treatment, and outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer.
The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with esophageal cancer (2004 to 2013). Treating facilities were categorized according to their relative burden of uninsured or Medicaid-insured patients. Hospitals with low (LBH), medium (MBH), and high (HBH) safety-net burden were compared with respect to patient demographics, disease and treatment characteristics, and survival using χ analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and multivariable modeling.
There were 56,115 patients from 1,215 facilities. HBH treated a greater proportion of racial and ethnic minorities and patients with lower socioeconomic status. Patients at HBH presented at later stages and received primary surgical therapy less often than at MBH and LBH. Survival for patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma did not differ significantly between HBH and LBH after adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, income, comorbidity, stage, histologic type, tumor location, facility type, insurance status, and treatment modality (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.14; p = 0.093). HBH were associated with a higher mortality risk than LBH for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.20; p = 0.014).
There is a mortality risk for patients with squamous cell carcinoma, but not for adenocarcinoma at HBH compared with LBH. Further analysis of unadjusted variables such as performance status, completion of therapy, and continuity of care, and others should be undertaken among safety-net hospitals with the goal of creating appropriate clinical pathways for care of esophageal cancer in vulnerable populations.
健康的社会决定因素会影响食管癌患者的诊断和护理。本研究假设医院的安全网负担会影响食管癌患者的就诊、治疗和结局。
从国家癌症数据库中检索了 2004 年至 2013 年间患有食管癌的患者。根据未参保或医疗补助参保患者的相对比例对治疗机构进行分类。比较低安全网负担医院(LBH)、中安全网负担医院(MBH)和高安全网负担医院(HBH)在患者人口统计学特征、疾病和治疗特征以及生存方面的差异,采用 χ2 检验、Kaplan-Meier 生存分析和多变量建模。
共纳入 1215 家医疗机构的 56115 名患者。HBH 治疗的种族和少数民族患者以及社会经济地位较低的患者比例更高。HBH 组患者就诊时分期更晚,接受主要手术治疗的比例低于 MBH 和 LBH。调整年龄、性别、种族、民族、收入、合并症、分期、组织学类型、肿瘤位置、医疗机构类型、保险状况和治疗方式后,食管腺癌患者在 HBH 和 LBH 之间的生存差异无统计学意义(风险比,1.06;95%置信区间,0.99 至 1.14;p=0.093)。对于鳞状细胞癌患者,HBH 与 LBH 相比,死亡风险更高(风险比,1.11;95%置信区间,1.02 至 1.20;p=0.014)。
与 LBH 相比,HBH 治疗的鳞状细胞癌患者的死亡率更高,但腺癌患者的死亡率没有差异。应在安全网医院中进一步分析未调整的变量,如功能状态、治疗完成情况和连续性护理等,并为弱势人群制定适当的食管癌治疗临床路径。