Gillquist J, Odensten M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Arthroscopy. 1988;4(1):5-9. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(88)80003-3.
Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament was compared with reconstruction through a miniarthrotomy. The operation time was significantly longer with arthroscopy, but the Lysholm scores and activity levels were the same in both groups before and 1 year after the operation. There was no difference in quadriceps torque between the groups before surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The measured stability in 20 degrees of knee flexion was similar in both groups before, immediately after, and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. A slow increase in the laxity was noted. One of 20 ligaments ruptured in the arthrotomy group due to a new trauma. In the arthroscopy group, there was one rupture due to abrasion. During the follow-up, two cases in the arthroscopy group had synovitis, in one case leading to removal of the prosthesis. There seems to be no major benefit from arthroscopic reconstruction in terms of rehabilitation. The miniarthrotomy is preferred since the notch plasty is easier to perform adequately during it than during arthroscopy.
将关节镜下前交叉韧带重建术与经小切口切开重建术进行了比较。关节镜手术时间明显更长,但两组在术前及术后1年的Lysholm评分和活动水平相同。术前及术后3、6和12个月时,两组之间的股四头肌扭矩没有差异。术前、术后即刻以及术后3、6和12个月时,两组在膝关节屈曲20度时测得的稳定性相似。发现松弛度有缓慢增加。切开手术组的20条韧带中有1条因新的创伤而断裂。在关节镜手术组中,有1条因磨损而断裂。在随访期间,关节镜手术组有2例发生滑膜炎,其中1例导致假体取出。就康复而言,关节镜重建似乎没有明显优势。由于在小切口切开手术中比在关节镜检查期间更容易充分进行切迹成形术,因此更倾向于采用小切口切开手术。