• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Is Submucosal Injection Helpful in Cold Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps?黏膜下注射对小的结直肠息肉冷圈套息肉切除术有帮助吗?
Clin Endosc. 2021 May;54(3):397-403. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.226. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
2
Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.三种不同内镜方法治疗 6-20mm 结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar;55(3):362-370. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1732456. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
3
Comparison of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.冷圈套内镜黏膜切除术与热圈套内镜黏膜切除术治疗小大肠息肉的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20335. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71067-1.
4
The efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy with submucosal injection for the removal of polyps less than 20 mm in size: a systematic review and meta-analysis.冷圈套息肉切除术联合黏膜下注射用于切除小于 20mm 息肉的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Nov;38(11):1892-1899. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16308. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
5
Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.冷圈套息肉切除术与冷内镜黏膜切除术治疗小的结直肠息肉:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3789-3795. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09875-1. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
6
Cold versus hot endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6-10 mm: a randomized trial.6 - 10毫米无蒂结直肠息肉的冷圈套与热圈套内镜黏膜切除术:一项随机试验
Endoscopy. 2018 Apr;50(4):403-411. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-118594. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
7
Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy.抗凝治疗患者中小肠息肉切除术:冷圈套与传统息肉切除术的前瞻性随机比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
8
Cold or Hot Snare with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 6-9 mm Colorectal Polyps: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.冷圈套或热圈套内镜下黏膜切除术治疗 6-9mm 结直肠息肉:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Feb;32(2):158-164. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0983. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
9
Polypectomy for complete endoscopic resection of small colorectal polyps.结肠镜下完全切除小的结直肠息肉的息肉切除术。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):733-740. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
10
Submucosal Injection Using Epinephrine-Added Saline in Cold Snare Polypectomy for Colorectal Polyps Shortens Time Required for Resection: A Randomized Controlled Study.在大肠息肉冷圈套息肉切除术中使用添加肾上腺素的生理盐水进行黏膜下注射可缩短切除所需时间:一项随机对照研究。
Cureus. 2023 May 17;15(5):e39164. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39164. eCollection 2023 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of contrast dye submucosal pre-lifting on cold snare resection of small polyps: an Italian randomized observational trial.对比染料黏膜下预抬举对小息肉冷圈套切除术的影响:一项意大利随机观察性试验
Clin Endosc. 2025 Mar;58(2):291-302. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.113. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
2
Survey of the Actual Practices Used for Endoscopic Removal of Colon Polyps in Korea: A Comparison with the Current Guidelines.韩国内镜下切除结肠息肉实际操作的调查:与现行指南的比较
Gut Liver. 2025 Jan 15;19(1):77-86. doi: 10.5009/gnl240217. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
3
Cold sub-mucosal injection versus traditional cold snare polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.冷黏膜下注射与传统冷圈套息肉切除术治疗小和微小结直肠息肉的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec;43(6):1111-1120. doi: 10.1007/s12664-024-01600-7. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.三种不同内镜方法治疗 6-20mm 结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar;55(3):362-370. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1732456. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
2
Cold Snare Polypectomy: Techniques and Applications.冷圈套息肉切除术:技术与应用
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan;18(1):42-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.052. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
3
Antiplatelets, anticoagulants, and colonoscopic polypectomy.抗血小板药物、抗凝药物和结肠镜息肉切除术。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Feb;91(2):257-265. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.09.033. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
4
Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments.结直肠肿瘤的内镜切除术技术:最新进展。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 21;25(3):300-307. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i3.300.
5
Patients Prescribed Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Have Low Risk of Postpolypectomy Complications.直接口服抗凝药物治疗的患者行息肉切除术后并发症风险低。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep;17(10):2000-2007.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.11.051. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
6
Histological Comparison of Cold versus Hot Snare Resections of the Colorectal Mucosa.冷圈套与热圈套切除结直肠黏膜的组织学比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Aug;61(8):964-970. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001109.
7
Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for resecting small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis.冷圈套与热圈套息肉切除术治疗结直肠小息肉的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2018 Sep;30(5):592-599. doi: 10.1111/den.13173. Epub 2018 May 14.
8
Post-polypectomy bleeding and thromboembolism risks associated with warfarin direct oral anticoagulants.肠息肉切除术后出血及血栓栓塞风险与华法林和直接口服抗凝剂相关。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr 14;24(14):1540-1549. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i14.1540.
9
New Strategies to Improve Polypectomy During Colonoscopy.结肠镜检查中改善息肉切除术的新策略。
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2017 Oct;13(10 Suppl 3):1-12.
10
Cold EMR of large sessile serrated polyps at colonoscopy (with video).结肠镜下冷切除大肠大型无蒂锯齿状息肉(附有视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):837-842. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

黏膜下注射对小的结直肠息肉冷圈套息肉切除术有帮助吗?

Is Submucosal Injection Helpful in Cold Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps?

作者信息

Song Ji Hyun, Friedland Shai

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Endosc. 2021 May;54(3):397-403. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.226. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

DOI:10.5946/ce.2020.226
PMID:33557513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8182251/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is an effective method of polyp removal for small colorectal polyps. However, the effect of submucosal injection in cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR) for small polyps is unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of submucosal injection in CS-EMR for small polyps.

METHODS

Between 2018 and 2019, 100 consecutive small colorectal polyps (5-10 mm) were identified in 58 patients. The first 50 consecutive polyps were removed by CS-EMR, and the remaining 50 were removed by CSP. Demographic data, clinical data, endoscopic findings, procedure times, complication rates, and pathology data were collected.

RESULTS

No difference in the complete resection rate was observed between the CS-EMR and CSP groups. A total of 9 polyps showed post-polypectomy bleeding (7 had immediate bleeding, 1 had delayed bleeding, and 1 had both immediate and delayed bleeding). No difference in the bleeding rate was observed between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, warfarin (odds ratio [OR], 42.334; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.006-1,781.758) and direct-acting oral anticoagulants (OR, 35.244; 95% CI, 3.853-322.397) showed a significantly increased risk of bleeding.

CONCLUSION

The effect of submucosal injection in CSP was not significant for small colorectal polyps.

摘要

背景/目的:冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)是切除小的结直肠息肉的有效方法。然而,在冷圈套内镜黏膜切除术(CS-EMR)中对小息肉进行黏膜下注射的效果尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在评估在CS-EMR中对小息肉进行黏膜下注射的效果。

方法

在2018年至2019年期间,在58例患者中识别出100个连续的小的结直肠息肉(5-10毫米)。前50个连续的息肉通过CS-EMR切除,其余50个通过CSP切除。收集人口统计学数据、临床数据、内镜检查结果、手术时间、并发症发生率和病理数据。

结果

CS-EMR组和CSP组之间在完全切除率方面未观察到差异。共有9个息肉出现息肉切除术后出血(7个有即时出血,1个有延迟出血,1个既有即时出血又有延迟出血)。两组之间在出血率方面未观察到差异。在多变量分析中,华法林(比值比[OR],42.334;95%置信区间[CI],1.006-1,781.758)和直接作用口服抗凝剂(OR,35.244;95%CI,3.853-322.397)显示出血风险显著增加。

结论

对于小的结直肠息肉,在CSP中进行黏膜下注射的效果不显著。