• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在大肠息肉冷圈套息肉切除术中使用添加肾上腺素的生理盐水进行黏膜下注射可缩短切除所需时间:一项随机对照研究。

Submucosal Injection Using Epinephrine-Added Saline in Cold Snare Polypectomy for Colorectal Polyps Shortens Time Required for Resection: A Randomized Controlled Study.

作者信息

Katagiri Atsushi, Suzuki Norihiro, Nakatani Shinya, Kikuchi Kazuo, Fujiwara Takahisa, Gocho Toshihiko, Konda Kenichi, Inoki Kazuya, Yamamura Fuyuhiko, Yoshida Hitoshi

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 May 17;15(5):e39164. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39164. eCollection 2023 May.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.39164
PMID:37332405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10276175/
Abstract

AIMS

Immediate bleeding after cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for colorectal polyps might interfere with confirmation of residuals and prolong the time required for resection. We investigated whether submucosal epinephrine-added saline injection reduces the time required for the CSP procedure.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial (clinical trial registration number: UMIN000046770). Patients with colorectal polyps ≤ 10 mm were randomly allocated to either CSP with epinephrine-added submucosal injection (CEMR group) or conventional CSP (CSP group). The primary outcome was the time required for resection defined as the time from the initiation of resection (the first insertion of the snare in the CSP group or the injection needle in the CEMR group) to the end of resection (confirming complete resection endoscopically after recognizing the cessation of immediate bleeding) in each lesion, and the secondary outcome was the time to spontaneous cessation of immediate bleeding after resection defined as the time from ensnaring the lesion to confirming the spontaneous cessation of immediate bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were randomly assigned. Finally, 261 lesions in 118 patients (CEMR group, n = 59; CSP group, n = 59) were analyzed. The time required for resection calculated using the least-square mean was significantly shorter in the CEMR group (106.3 s, 95% CI 97.5 to 115.4 s) than in the CSP group (130.9 s, 95% CI 121.2 to 140.7 s) (P < 0.001). The time to spontaneous cessation of immediate bleeding was also significantly shorter in the CEMR group (20.4 s, 95% CI 14.3 to 26.5 s) than in the CSP group (74.2 s, 95% CI 67.6 to 80.7 s) (P < 0.001). Neither group had cases requiring hemostasis, perforation, or delayed bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

CEMR shortened the time for resection by shortening the time to cessation of immediate bleeding compared with conventional CSP in colorectal polyps ≤ 10 mm.

摘要

目的

结直肠息肉冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)后立即出血可能会干扰对残留情况的确认,并延长切除所需时间。我们研究了黏膜下注射含肾上腺素的生理盐水是否能缩短CSP手术所需时间。

方法

我们开展了一项单中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验(临床试验注册号:UMIN000046770)。将结直肠息肉直径≤10 mm的患者随机分为黏膜下注射肾上腺素的CSP组(CEMR组)或传统CSP组(CSP组)。主要结局是每个病变的切除所需时间,定义为从切除开始(CSP组为圈套器首次插入,CEMR组为注射针插入)到切除结束(在确认立即出血停止后通过内镜确认完全切除)的时间,次要结局是切除后立即出血自然停止的时间,定义为从套住病变到确认立即出血自然停止的时间。

结果

共126例患者被随机分组。最终,对118例患者的261个病变进行了分析(CEMR组,n = 59;CSP组,n = 59)。使用最小二乘均数计算的切除所需时间在CEMR组(106.3秒,95%可信区间97.5至115.4秒)显著短于CSP组(130.9秒,95%可信区间121.2至140.7秒)(P < 0.001)。CEMR组立即出血自然停止的时间也显著短于CSP组(20.4秒,95%可信区间14.3至26.5秒)(74.2秒,95%可信区间67.6至80.7秒)(P < 0.001)。两组均无需要止血、穿孔或延迟出血的病例。

结论

与传统CSP相比,对于直径≤10 mm的结直肠息肉,CEMR通过缩短立即出血停止的时间缩短了切除时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dba/10276175/367d46ccc85c/cureus-0015-00000039164-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dba/10276175/19b3461cab82/cureus-0015-00000039164-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dba/10276175/f39044945a6c/cureus-0015-00000039164-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dba/10276175/367d46ccc85c/cureus-0015-00000039164-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dba/10276175/19b3461cab82/cureus-0015-00000039164-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dba/10276175/f39044945a6c/cureus-0015-00000039164-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dba/10276175/367d46ccc85c/cureus-0015-00000039164-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Submucosal Injection Using Epinephrine-Added Saline in Cold Snare Polypectomy for Colorectal Polyps Shortens Time Required for Resection: A Randomized Controlled Study.在大肠息肉冷圈套息肉切除术中使用添加肾上腺素的生理盐水进行黏膜下注射可缩短切除所需时间:一项随机对照研究。
Cureus. 2023 May 17;15(5):e39164. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39164. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.冷圈套息肉切除术与冷内镜黏膜切除术治疗小的结直肠息肉:一项随机对照试验的Meta分析
Clin Endosc. 2024 Nov;57(6):747-758. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.081. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
3
Impact of submucosal saline solution injection for cold snare polypectomy of small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled study.黏膜下生理盐水注射辅助冷圈套息肉切除术治疗结直肠小息肉的随机对照研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep;92(3):715-722.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.039. Epub 2020 May 31.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy versus Cold Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Resecting 3-10 mm Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.冷圈套息肉切除术与冷内镜黏膜切除术切除 3-10mm 结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Digestion. 2024;105(3):157-165. doi: 10.1159/000535521. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
5
Impact of Submucosal Saline Injection During Cold Snare Polypectomy for Colorectal Polyps Sized 3-9 mm: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.黏膜下生理盐水注射在 3-9mm 大小结直肠息肉冷圈套息肉切除术的应用效果:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 1;118(10):1848-1854. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002329. Epub 2023 May 19.
6
Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy.微小结直肠息肉的切除:冷圈套息肉切除术与热活检钳活检的前瞻性随机临床试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 14;23(2):328-335. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.328.
7
Is Submucosal Injection Helpful in Cold Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps?黏膜下注射对小的结直肠息肉冷圈套息肉切除术有帮助吗?
Clin Endosc. 2021 May;54(3):397-403. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.226. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
8
Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.冷圈套息肉切除术与冷内镜黏膜切除术治疗小的结直肠息肉:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3789-3795. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09875-1. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
9
Cold sub-mucosal injection versus traditional cold snare polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.冷黏膜下注射与传统冷圈套息肉切除术治疗小和微小结直肠息肉的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec;43(6):1111-1120. doi: 10.1007/s12664-024-01600-7. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
10
Cold Snare Polypectomy With or Without Submucosal Injection for Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.冷圈套息肉切除术联合或不联合黏膜下注射用于结直肠息肉内镜切除:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Apr;69(4):1411-1420. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08353-5. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.冷圈套息肉切除术与冷内镜黏膜切除术治疗小的结直肠息肉:一项随机对照试验的Meta分析
Clin Endosc. 2024 Nov;57(6):747-758. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.081. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Cold sub-mucosal injection versus traditional cold snare polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.冷黏膜下注射与传统冷圈套息肉切除术治疗小和微小结直肠息肉的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec;43(6):1111-1120. doi: 10.1007/s12664-024-01600-7. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Piecemeal cold snare polypectomy versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile serrated lesions: a retrospective comparison across two successive periods.分段冷圈套息肉切除术与传统内镜黏膜切除术治疗大型无蒂锯齿状病变的回顾性比较:两个连续时期的比较。
Gut. 2021 Sep;70(9):1691-1697. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321753. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
2
Impact of submucosal saline solution injection for cold snare polypectomy of small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled study.黏膜下生理盐水注射辅助冷圈套息肉切除术治疗结直肠小息肉的随机对照研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep;92(3):715-722.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.039. Epub 2020 May 31.
3
Cold Snare Polypectomy With or Without Submucosal Injection for Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
冷圈套息肉切除术联合或不联合黏膜下注射用于结直肠息肉内镜切除:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Apr;69(4):1411-1420. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08353-5. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
Delayed hemorrhage after cold and hot snare resection of colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized trial (interim analysis).
结直肠息肉冷热圈套切除术后延迟性出血:一项多中心随机试验(中期分析)
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Sep;7(9):E1123-E1129. doi: 10.1055/a-0854-3561. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
4
Analysis of predictive factors for R0 resection and immediate bleeding of cold snare polypectomy in colonoscopy.分析结肠镜下冷圈套息肉切除术 R0 切除和即刻出血的预测因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 1;14(3):e0213281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213281. eCollection 2019.
5
Cold snare endoscopic resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and pooled-analysis.冷圈套内镜切除术治疗直径大于 10mm 的无蒂结直肠息肉:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 May;89(5):929-936.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.12.022. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
6
Alternative approaches to polyp extraction in colonoscopy: a proof of principle study.结肠镜下息肉提取的替代方法:原理验证研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep;88(3):536-541. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
7
Guidelines for Gastroenterological Endoscopy in Patients Undergoing Antithrombotic Treatment: 2017 Appendix on Anticoagulants Including Direct Oral Anticoagulants.抗血栓治疗患者胃肠内镜检查指南:2017 年抗凝药物(包括直接口服抗凝剂)附录
Dig Endosc. 2018 Jul;30(4):433-440. doi: 10.1111/den.13184.
8
Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for resecting small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis.冷圈套与热圈套息肉切除术治疗结直肠小息肉的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2018 Sep;30(5):592-599. doi: 10.1111/den.13173. Epub 2018 May 14.
9
Wide-field piecemeal cold snare polypectomy of large sessile serrated polyps without a submucosal injection is safe.无黏膜下注射的大面积节段性冷圈套息肉切除术治疗大型无蒂锯齿状息肉是安全的。
Endoscopy. 2018 Mar;50(3):248-252. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121219. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
10
Cold EMR of large sessile serrated polyps at colonoscopy (with video).结肠镜下冷切除大肠大型无蒂锯齿状息肉(附有视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):837-842. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 10.