Diabetes Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Can J Diabetes. 2021 Aug;45(6):557-565.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
Our aim in this study was to assess the impact of the Diabetes Canada Dissemination & Implementation strategy on population-level prescription rates of blood glucose test strips.
We extracted all diabetes-related drugs and test strip claims in Manitoba and Saskatchewan between January 1, 2000 and September 30, 2015 from the Canadian Institute for Health Information's National Prescription Drug Utilization Information System. The primary outcome was the proportion of the cohort in each quarter who had been dispensed strips in accordance with the Diabetes Canada 2013 guidelines. We conducted an interrupted time-series analysis examining prescribing trends overall and by drug groups.
The overall average sample size per quarter was 57,576 (standard deviation [SD]=12,320) and 49,533 (SD=10,206) individuals; the average age was 62.1 (SD=0.3) and 63.8 (SD=0.3) years, and the average proportion of total beneficiaries in the sample was 12.7% (SD=1.9%) and 12.6% (SD=1.7%) for Manitoba and Saskatchewan, respectively. On average preintervention, 27.9% (SD=0.68%, Manitoba) and 31.9% (SD=0.73%, Saskatchewan) of the sampled patients used strips according to the guidelines. On average postintervention, 26.5% (SD=0.29%, Manitoba) and 30.6% (SD=0.53%, Saskatchewan) of the patients used strips according to the guidelines. None of the interrupted time-series models reached statistical significance (p values ranging from 0.44 to 0.98 for Manitoba and 0.13 to 0.81 for Saskatchewan, depending on drug group).
The guideline and its Dissemination & Implementation strategy did not change strip prescribing. Potential reasons include complexity of the recommendations, lack of penetrance to primary care physicians and/or disagreement with recommendations.
本研究旨在评估加拿大糖尿病传播与实施策略对血糖测试条人群处方率的影响。
我们从加拿大健康信息研究所的国家处方药物利用信息系统中提取了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 9 月 30 日期间曼尼托巴省和萨斯喀彻温省所有与糖尿病相关的药物和测试带索赔。主要结果是每季度按照加拿大糖尿病 2013 年指南规定的比例,有多少患者获得了测试带。我们进行了一项中断时间序列分析,以检查总体和按药物组的处方趋势。
每个季度的总体平均样本量为 57576(标准差[SD]=12320)和 49533(SD=10206)人;平均年龄为 62.1(SD=0.3)和 63.8(SD=0.3)岁,样本中总受益人的平均比例分别为 12.7%(SD=1.9%)和 12.6%(SD=1.7%),分别为曼尼托巴省和萨斯喀彻温省。平均而言,在干预前,27.9%(SD=0.68%,曼尼托巴省)和 31.9%(SD=0.73%,萨斯喀彻温省)的抽样患者根据指南使用了测试带。平均而言,干预后,26.5%(SD=0.29%,曼尼托巴省)和 30.6%(SD=0.53%,萨斯喀彻温省)的患者根据指南使用了测试带。曼尼托巴省的任何中断时间序列模型都没有达到统计学意义(p 值范围从 0.44 到 0.98,取决于药物组),萨斯喀彻温省为 0.13 至 0.81。
该指南及其传播与实施策略并未改变测试带的处方。潜在原因包括建议的复杂性、对初级保健医生的渗透不足和/或与建议不一致。