Shahbazi Marjan, Mirzakhani Navid
Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Physiotherapy Research Center and Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iran J Child Neurol. 2021 Winter;15(1):29-46. doi: 10.22037/ijcn.v15i1.21274.
processing disorder (SPD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that can negatively affect objective, emotional, and behavioral functioning. Therefore, assessing sensory processing is critical in children. This study aimed to provide a current comprehensive list of assessment instruments special about sensory processing in children aged between 0 and 14 years.
MATERIALS & METHODS: This systematic review focused on pediatric assessment of sensory processing. Three electronic databases (Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and ProQuest) were comprehensively searched for eligible studies, and language restriction (English) was applied.The search strategy consisted of keywords and medical subordinate headings for sensory processing and various pediatric assessment tools.
Thirty-four assessment tools were identified, of which nine met the predefined inclusion criteria. The test of ideational praxis, clinical observations of proprioception, and pediatric clinical test of sensory interaction for balance were clinical observational assessment tools.The final tool was a caregiver or teacher reported questionnaire. The obtained studies evaluated the clinical use and psychometric properties of these nine assessment tools.
The result of this study indicated that each of the sensory processing assessment tools considered various aspects of sensory processing.Selecting the most appropriate assessment tools to measure sensory processing function in children depends on specific components of sensory processing that need to be evaluated.
感觉加工障碍(SPD)是一种神经发育障碍,会对认知、情感和行为功能产生负面影响。因此,对儿童进行感觉加工评估至关重要。本研究旨在提供一份当前关于0至14岁儿童感觉加工评估工具的全面清单。
本系统评价聚焦于儿童感觉加工的评估。全面检索了三个电子数据库(谷歌学术、科学网、Scopus、PubMed和ProQuest)以查找符合条件的研究,并设定了语言限制(英语)。检索策略包括感觉加工的关键词和医学副标题以及各种儿科评估工具。
共识别出34种评估工具,其中9种符合预定义的纳入标准。观念性实践测试、本体感觉临床观察以及平衡感觉交互作用儿科临床测试均为临床观察评估工具。最后一种工具是由照料者或教师填写的问卷。纳入的研究评估了这9种评估工具的临床应用和心理测量特性。
本研究结果表明,每种感觉加工评估工具都考虑了感觉加工的各个方面。选择最合适的评估工具来测量儿童的感觉加工功能取决于需要评估的感觉加工的具体组成部分。