Internal Medicine, Abington Jefferson Health, Abington, PA, USA.
Department of Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA.
Artif Organs. 2021 Aug;45(8):838-844. doi: 10.1111/aor.13934. Epub 2021 May 11.
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) candidacy screening includes evaluation for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). However, given current evidence, the impact of PAD on post-LVAD complications remains unknown. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2002-2017) was utilized to identify all LVAD cases. The in-hospital safety endpoints included major cardiovascular adverse events and its components. A propensity-matched analysis was used to obtain adjusted odds ratios (aOR). A subgroup analysis of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) with PAD was also performed. A total of 27 424 patients with LVAD implantation (PAD: 516 [1.8%] and no-PAD 26 908 [98.2%]) were included. There were significant intergroup differences in the demographics and baseline comorbidities. A weighted sample of 1053 (no-PAD 537, PAD 516) propensity-matched population was selected. The adjusted odds for in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.44, P = .004) were found to be significantly higher for LVAD-patients with PAD. There was no significant difference in the adjusted odds of MACE (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.87-1.5), postprocedure bleeding (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.62-1.26, P = .54) and risk of pneumonia (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.44-1.15, P = .63) between the two groups. A selected cohort of DM-only population (7339) consistently showed a higher adjusted mortality rate in PAD patients with LVAD implantation (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.47, P = .01). The rate of MACE (P = .17), myocardial infarction (P = .12), stroke (P = .60), postprocedural (0.10), and major bleeding (P = .51) remained identical between patients with PAD and those with no-PAD. PAD confers an increased risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. This risk increases further in patients with a concomitant diagnosis of DM.
左心室辅助装置 (LVAD) 候选资格筛查包括外周动脉疾病 (PAD) 的评估。然而,鉴于目前的证据,PAD 对 LVAD 后并发症的影响尚不清楚。本研究利用国家住院患者样本 (NIS) 数据库 (2002-2017 年) 确定了所有 LVAD 病例。住院期间的安全性终点包括主要心血管不良事件及其组成部分。采用倾向匹配分析获得调整后的优势比 (aOR)。还对合并 PAD 的糖尿病 (DM) 患者进行了亚组分析。共纳入 27424 例 LVAD 植入患者 (PAD:516[1.8%],无 PAD:26908[98.2%])。两组在人口统计学和基线合并症方面存在显著差异。选择了一组 1053 名加权样本(无 PAD:537,PAD:516)进行倾向匹配。发现 PAD 组 LVAD 患者的院内死亡率调整后优势比 (aOR 1.7;95%CI,1.2-2.44,P=0.004) 显著更高。两组之间在 MACE(aOR 1.16,95%CI 0.87-1.5)、术后出血(aOR 0.88,95%CI 0.62-1.26,P=0.54)和肺炎风险(aOR 0.67,95%CI 0.44-1.15,P=0.63)的调整后优势比均无显著差异。在仅患有 DM 的选定队列中(7339 例),PAD 患者的 LVAD 植入后调整死亡率更高(aOR 2.3,95%CI 1.2-4.47,P=0.01)。两组患者的 MACE(P=0.17)、心肌梗死(P=0.12)、中风(P=0.60)、术后(P=0.10)和主要出血(P=0.51)发生率无差异。PAD 会增加接受 LVAD 植入患者的院内全因死亡率风险。在合并 DM 的患者中,这种风险进一步增加。