Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Biometrics. 2022 Jun;78(2):754-765. doi: 10.1111/biom.13441. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesize results from well-conducted studies to optimize healthcare decision-making. Network meta-analysis (NMA) is particularly useful for improving precision, drawing new comparisons, and ranking multiple interventions. However, recommendations can be misled if published results are a selective sample of what has been collected by trialists, particularly when publication status is related to the significance of the findings. Unfortunately, the missing-not-at-random nature of this problem and the numerous parameters involved in modeling NMAs pose unique computational challenges to quantifying and correcting for publication bias, such that sensitivity analysis is used in practice. Motivated by this important methodological gap, we developed a novel and stable expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm to correct for publication bias in the network setting. We validate the method through simulation studies and show that it achieves substantial bias reduction in small to moderately sized NMAs. We also calibrate the method against a Bayesian analysis of a published NMA on antiplatlet therapies for maintaining vascular patency.
系统评价和荟萃分析综合了精心设计的研究结果,以优化医疗保健决策。网络荟萃分析(NMA)特别有助于提高精度、进行新的比较和对多种干预措施进行排名。然而,如果发表的结果只是试验者收集的结果的选择性样本,特别是当发表状态与研究结果的显著性相关时,那么建议可能会产生误导。不幸的是,这个问题的非随机缺失性质以及 NMA 建模中涉及的众多参数对量化和纠正发表偏倚提出了独特的计算挑战,因此在实践中使用敏感性分析。受此重要方法学差距的启发,我们开发了一种新颖且稳定的期望最大化(EM)算法,以纠正网络环境中的发表偏倚。我们通过模拟研究验证了该方法,并表明它在小型到中型 NMA 中实现了大量的偏差减少。我们还针对一项关于维持血管通畅的抗血小板治疗的已发表 NMA 的贝叶斯分析对该方法进行了校准。