• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线社区作为患者赋权的驱动力:系统综述。

Online Communities as a Driver for Patient Empowerment: Systematic Review.

机构信息

University West, School of Business, Economics and IT, SE-461 86, Trollhättan, Sweden.

School of Computer Science, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e19910. doi: 10.2196/19910.

DOI:10.2196/19910
PMID:33560233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7902187/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of online resources has changed how people manage health care processes. Patients seek information about health conditions, guidance in treatment, and support from peers online, complementary to traditional health care trajectories. Online communities have the potential to contribute to the quality of care by increasing patient empowerment; however, there is a gap in research regarding in what way online communities contribute to patient empowerment.

OBJECTIVE

We synthesized research regarding how online communities contribute to patient empowerment to address the research question "In what ways can participation in online communities support patient empowerment?" by studying how patient empowerment is operationalized in different studies. The definition of patient empowerment used in this paper is enablement for people to develop mastery over actions and control over decisions that influence their lives. The mastery is both through processes and outcomes of the development.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted by searching in the following databases: Scopus, ACM Digital Library, EBSCO (CINAHL and MEDLINE), PubMed, and Web of Science. In total, there were 1187 papers after excluding duplicates, and through selection processes using an analytical framework with definitions of patient empowerment and related concepts, 33 peer-reviewed papers were included.

RESULTS

Findings indicated that online communities support patient empowerment both as a process and as outcomes of these processes. Additionally, it was seen as a complement to traditional health care and encouragement for health care professionals to have a more positive attitude toward patients' usage. There was a mix between deductive (19/33, 58%), inductive (11/33, 33%), and a mixed approach (3/33, 9%) of studying patient empowerment in various forms. The online communities in most papers (21/33, 64%) were well-established and represented patients' initiatives.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to include professionals' perspectives regarding how health care can embrace patient empowerment through online communities. This systematic review's main contribution is the proposal of a new framework and conceptualization of how patient empowerment in online communities can be understood from different hierarchical levels.

摘要

背景

在线资源的使用改变了人们管理医疗流程的方式。患者在线寻找健康状况信息、治疗指导和同伴支持,以此作为传统医疗轨迹的补充。在线社区有可能通过增强患者权能来提高医疗质量;然而,关于在线社区如何增强患者权能,研究仍存在空白。

目的

本研究通过研究不同研究中如何操作化患者权能,综合有关在线社区如何增强患者权能的研究,以回答“参与在线社区如何支持患者权能?”这一研究问题。本文使用的患者权能定义是使人们能够对影响其生活的行动和决策发展掌控。这种掌控既是通过发展过程,也是通过发展结果来实现的。

方法

通过在 Scopus、ACM 数字图书馆、EBSCO(CINAHL 和 MEDLINE)、PubMed 和 Web of Science 等数据库中进行系统检索,开展了一项系统综述。在排除重复项后,共得到 1187 篇论文,然后通过使用带有患者权能和相关概念定义的分析框架进行选择过程,最终纳入 33 篇同行评议论文。

结果

研究结果表明,在线社区既支持患者权能作为一个过程,也支持这些过程的结果。此外,它被视为对传统医疗的补充,并鼓励医疗保健专业人员对患者的使用持更积极的态度。研究中采用了多种形式来研究患者权能,包括演绎法(19/33,58%)、归纳法(11/33,33%)和混合方法(3/33,9%)。大多数论文(21/33,64%)中的在线社区都是成熟的,代表了患者的倡议。

结论

需要纳入专业人士的观点,探讨医疗保健如何通过在线社区接受患者权能。本系统综述的主要贡献是提出了一个新的框架和概念化方法,用于从不同层次理解在线社区中的患者权能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b64/7902187/37b8fe23d5a7/jmir_v23i2e19910_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b64/7902187/589b0a32ed96/jmir_v23i2e19910_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b64/7902187/b5132cfa4092/jmir_v23i2e19910_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b64/7902187/37b8fe23d5a7/jmir_v23i2e19910_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b64/7902187/589b0a32ed96/jmir_v23i2e19910_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b64/7902187/b5132cfa4092/jmir_v23i2e19910_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b64/7902187/37b8fe23d5a7/jmir_v23i2e19910_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Online Communities as a Driver for Patient Empowerment: Systematic Review.在线社区作为患者赋权的驱动力:系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e19910. doi: 10.2196/19910.
2
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
3
Improving the Theoretical Understanding Toward Patient-Driven Health Care Innovation Through Online Value Cocreation: Systematic Review.通过在线价值共创提高对患者驱动的医疗保健创新的理论理解:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 24;22(4):e16324. doi: 10.2196/16324.
4
Impact of Social Processes in Online Health Communities on Patient Empowerment in Relationship With the Physician: Emergence of Functional and Dysfunctional Empowerment.在线健康社区中的社会过程对患者在医患关系中的赋权的影响:功能性赋权与功能失调性赋权的出现
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 13;19(3):e74. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7002.
5
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
6
Views of Community Managers on Knowledge Co-creation in Online Communities for People With Disabilities: Qualitative Study.社区管理者对残疾人在线社区知识共创的看法:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 10;19(10):e320. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7406.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
The Antecedents and Consequences of Health Care Professional-Patient Online Interactions: Systematic Review.医疗保健专业人员与患者在线互动的前因与后果:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 25;21(9):e13940. doi: 10.2196/13940.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Do online communities change power processes in healthcare? Using case studies to examine the use of online health communities by patients with Parkinson's disease.在线社区会改变医疗保健中的权力流程吗?利用案例研究考察帕金森病患者对在线健康社区的使用情况。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 7;6(11):e012110. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012110.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioral Innovations to Access Abortion Post-Dobbs: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Reddit's r/abortion Community in 2022.多布斯案后获取堕胎服务的行为创新:对2022年Reddit上r/堕胎社区的定性主题分析
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251351192. doi: 10.1177/00469580251351192. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
2
Quality and Misinformation About Health Conditions in Online Peer Support Groups: Scoping Review.在线同伴支持小组中关于健康状况的质量与错误信息:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 16;27:e71140. doi: 10.2196/71140.
3
Internet use for health information, health service utilization, and quality of care in the U.S.

本文引用的文献

1
Individualized blended care for patients with colorectal cancer: the patient's view on informational support.个体化混合照护对结直肠癌患者的影响:患者对信息支持的看法。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jun;29(6):3061-3067. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05810-5. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
2
Design, Delivery, Maintenance, and Outcomes of Peer-to-Peer Online Support Groups for People With Chronic Musculoskeletal Disorders: Systematic Review.慢性肌肉骨骼疾病患者点对点在线支持小组的设计、实施、维护及效果:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 24;22(4):e15822. doi: 10.2196/15822.
3
Successful Moderation in Online Patient Communities: Inductive Case Study.
美国互联网在健康信息获取、医疗服务利用及医疗质量方面的应用
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 8;25(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12807-5.
4
Clusters of Patient Empowerment and Mental Health Literacy Differentiate Professional Help-Seeking Attitudes in Online Mental Health Communities Users.患者赋权与心理健康素养集群区分在线心理健康社区用户的专业求助态度。
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70153. doi: 10.1111/hex.70153.
5
Evaluating the User-Perceived Benefit of a Virtual Lung Cancer Patient Education and Support Community: LVNG With Lung Cancer.评估虚拟肺癌患者教育与支持社区(LVNG With Lung Cancer)的用户感知效益。
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2024 Jul 21:1-17. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.8.
6
Dermatologic Data From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 and the PatientsLikeMe Online Support Community: Comparative Analysis.来自2019年全球疾病负担研究和PatientsLikeMe在线支持社区的皮肤病学数据:比较分析。
JMIR Dermatol. 2024 Dec 11;7:e50449. doi: 10.2196/50449.
7
Impact of Reverse Empowerment and Proactive Motivations on Physicians' Online Knowledge Sharing in Digital Platforms: Survey Study.反向赋权和主动动机对医生在数字平台上在线知识共享的影响:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 29;26:e59904. doi: 10.2196/59904.
8
How Does an Online Mental Health Community on Twitter Empower Diverse Population Levels and Groups? A Qualitative Analysis of #BipolarClub.在 Twitter 上的在线心理健康社区如何为不同人群和群体赋权?#BipolarClub 的定性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 19;26:e55965. doi: 10.2196/55965.
9
Connecting Health and Technology: A Comprehensive Review of Social Media and Online Communities in Healthcare.连接健康与技术:医疗保健领域社交媒体和在线社区的全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Mar 1;16(3):e55361. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55361. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
A Mobile App (Concerto) to Empower Hospitalized Patients in a Swiss University Hospital: Development, Design, and Implementation Report.一款助力瑞士大学医院住院患者的移动应用程序(Concerto):开发、设计与实施报告。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Mar 28;12:e47914. doi: 10.2196/47914.
在线患者社区中的成功管理:归纳性案例研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 17;22(3):e15983. doi: 10.2196/15983.
4
Collective Empowerment in Online Health Communities: Scale Development and Empirical Validation.在线健康社区中的集体赋权:量表开发与实证验证
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 20;21(11):e14392. doi: 10.2196/14392.
5
Role of the Internet in Solving the Last Mile Problem in Medicine.互联网在解决医疗领域“最后一公里”问题中的作用。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 28;21(10):e16385. doi: 10.2196/16385.
6
Internet-Based Interventions for Carers of Individuals With Psychiatric Disorders, Neurological Disorders, or Brain Injuries: Systematic Review.针对患有精神疾病、神经疾病或脑损伤患者的照顾者的基于互联网的干预措施:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 9;21(7):e10876. doi: 10.2196/10876.
7
Theories Predicting End-User Acceptance of Telemedicine Use: Systematic Review.预测终端用户对远程医疗使用接受度的理论:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 21;21(5):e13117. doi: 10.2196/13117.
8
What Do Patients Say About Doctors Online? A Systematic Review of Studies on Patient Online Reviews.患者在网上如何评价医生?关于患者在线评价研究的系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 8;21(4):e12521. doi: 10.2196/12521.
9
Flipped healthcare for better or worse.翻转医疗,好坏参半。
Health Informatics J. 2019 Sep;25(3):587-597. doi: 10.1177/1460458219833099. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
10
Person-Centred Care in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的以患者为中心的护理:与一项随机对照试验同时进行的成本效益分析。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Dec;3(4):495-504. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-0126-3.