Barbara M. Geven is a pediatric intensive care nurse and clinical epidemiologist, Amsterdam UMC/Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jolanda M. Maaskant is a senior nurse researcher and clinical epidemiologist, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC/University of Amsterdam.
Crit Care Nurse. 2021 Feb 1;41(1):e17-e23. doi: 10.4037/ccn2021462.
Iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome is a well-known adverse effect of sedatives and analgesics commonly used in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the pediatric intensive care unit, with an incidence of up to 64.6%. When standard sedative and analgesic treatment is inadequate, dexmedetomidine may be added. The effect of supplemental dexmedetomidine on iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome is unclear.
To explore the potentially preventive effect of dexmedetomidine, used as a supplement to standard morphine and midazolam regimens, on the development of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the pediatric intensive care unit.
This retrospective observational study used data from patients on a 10-bed general pediatric intensive care unit. Iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome was measured using the Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms-scale.
In a sample of 102 patients, the cumulative dose of dexmedetomidine had no preventive effect on the development of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (P = .19). After correction for the imbalance in the baseline characteristics between patients who did and did not receive dexmedetomidine, the cumulative dose of midazolam was found to be a significant risk factor for iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (P < .03).
In this study, supplemental dexmedetomidine had no preventive effect on iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in patients receiving sedative treatment in the pediatric intensive care unit. The cumulative dose of midazolam was a significant risk factor for iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome.
在小儿重症监护病房接受机械通气的患者中,镇静和镇痛药物的治疗常常会引起医源性撤药综合征,其发病率高达 64.6%。当标准镇静和镇痛治疗不足时,可能会加用右美托咪定。补充右美托咪定对医源性撤药综合征的影响尚不清楚。
旨在探讨右美托咪定作为标准吗啡和咪达唑仑治疗方案的补充,对小儿重症监护病房机械通气患者医源性撤药综合征的发展是否具有潜在的预防作用。
这是一项回顾性观察研究,使用了来自 10 张普通儿科重症监护病房患者的数据。使用 Sophia 观察撤药症状量表测量医源性撤药综合征。
在 102 例患者的样本中,右美托咪定的累积剂量对医源性撤药综合征的发展没有预防作用(P =.19)。在对接受和未接受右美托咪定的患者之间的基线特征不平衡进行校正后,发现咪达唑仑的累积剂量是医源性撤药综合征的一个显著危险因素(P <.03)。
在这项研究中,在接受镇静治疗的小儿重症监护病房患者中,补充右美托咪定对医源性撤药综合征没有预防作用。咪达唑仑的累积剂量是医源性撤药综合征的一个显著危险因素。